From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Dreier Subject: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH 2.6.21] iw_cxgb3 - Add set_tcb_rpl_handler. Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 09:07:20 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1176382594.9396.1.camel@stevo-desktop> <461E45C3.2050400@chelsio.com> <1176392566.9396.11.camel@stevo-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik , OpenFabrics General , linux-kernel , Divy Le Ray To: Steve Wise Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1176392566.9396.11.camel@stevo-desktop> (Steve Wise's message of "Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:42:46 -0500") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org Errors-To: general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org > The patch is the 3rd of 3: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=117617444622279&w=2 > > Jeff applied it into his upstream tree here: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=117630664627997&w=2 OK, so it's not in Linus's tree yet. Jeff, how do you want to handle this? (That last patch breaks drivers/infiniband/hw/cxgb3, and Steve posted a fix to handle it) The cleanest thing would be for you to roll up Steve's fix into the patch you merged, so that Linus's tree is never in the state where it has half the change merged. But I don't know if that fits your workflow. Thanks...