From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: tcp bw in 2.6
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:44:04 -0700
Message-ID: <ada641pgsbv.fsf@cisco.com>
References: <E1IcfN0-0007tt-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>
	<20071002150935.GC17418@bitmover.com>
	<alpine.LFD.0.999.0710021146580.3579@woody.linux-foundation.org>
	<20071002.133322.52193802.davem@davemloft.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, lm@bitmover.com,
	herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, wscott@bitmover.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com ([171.71.176.117]:54566 "EHLO
	sj-iport-6.cisco.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753497AbXJBUoZ (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 2 Oct 2007 16:44:25 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20071002.133322.52193802.davem@davemloft.net> (David Miller's message of "Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:33:22 -0700 (PDT)")
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

 > It would be really great to see numbers with a more recent kernel
 > than 2.6.18

FWIW Debian has binaries for 2.6.21 in testing and for 2.6.22 in
unstable so it should be very easy for Larry to try at least those.

 - R.