netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
To: Steve Wise <swise@opengridcomputing.com>
Cc: general@lists.openfabrics.org, ewg@lists.openfabrics.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	sean.hefty@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] iw_cxgb3: Support "iwarp-only" interfaces to avoid 4-tuple conflicts with the host stack.
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 08:18:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ada642puonr.fsf@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46DD762F.80904@opengridcomputing.com> (Steve Wise's message of "Tue, 04 Sep 2007 10:13:51 -0500")

 > > What's wrong with my suggestion of having the iwarp driver create an
 > > "iwX" interface to go with the normal "ethX" interface?  It seems
 > > simpler to me, and there's a somewhat similar precedent with how
 > > mac80211 devices create both wlan0 and wmaster0 interfaces.
 > >  - R.
 > 
 > It seemed much more painful for me to implement. :-)
 > 
 > I'll look into this, but I think for this to be done, the changes must
 > be in the cxgb3 driver, not the rdma driver, because the guts of the
 > netdev struct are all private to cxgb3.  Remember that this interface
 > needs to still do non TCP traffic (like ARP and UDP)...
 > 
 > Maybe you have something in mind here that I'm not thinking about?

No, I was just spouting off.

But the whole "create a magic alias" seems kind of unfriendly to the
user.  Maybe as you said, the cxgb3 net driver could create the alias
for the iw_cxgb3 driver?

 - R.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-09-05 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-23 21:39 [ofa-general] [PATCH RFC] iw_cxgb3: Support "iwarp-only" interfaces to avoid 4-tuple conflicts with the host stack Steve Wise
2007-08-31  4:27 ` [ofa-general] " Roland Dreier
2007-09-04 15:13   ` Steve Wise
2007-09-05 15:18     ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2007-09-05 15:40       ` [ofa-general] " Steve Wise
2007-09-05 17:27         ` Steve Wise

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ada642puonr.fsf@cisco.com \
    --to=rdreier@cisco.com \
    --cc=ewg@lists.openfabrics.org \
    --cc=general@lists.openfabrics.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sean.hefty@intel.com \
    --cc=swise@opengridcomputing.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).