From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Dreier Subject: Re: [ofa-general][PATCH 2/2] mlx4: ConnectX multi functional device support Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:05:23 -0700 Message-ID: References: <4A3A34F5.9030800@mellanox.co.il> <4A4C816A.2040506@mellanox.co.il> <4A4CD0D7.6070409@mellanox.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, general@lists.openfabrics.org To: Tziporet Koren Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4A4CD0D7.6070409@mellanox.co.il> (Tziporet Koren's message of "Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:23:03 +0300") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org Errors-To: general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org > The risk is very low, however without it our new device coming in July > will not work on the new kernel :-( > And if not on 2.6.31 can you at list queue it on your future work tree? Well, I need to think over the patch a little more. The risk is certainly not zero, since we are changing device initialization for all mlx4 devices. And I'm not sure if missing 2.6.31 support is that big a deal for you, is it? How many users do you have building their own upstream kernels? You're just going to tell everyone to use OFED anyway, right? - R.