From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Resending NetXen 1G/10G NIC driver patch
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 13:02:43 -0700
Message-ID: <ada7j48h7vg.fsf@cisco.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0605250339490.5844-100000@unmsrvr>
	<200605261116.50176.amitkale@linsyssoft.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	sanjeev@unminc.com, unmproj@linsyssoft.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com ([171.68.10.87]:22037 "EHLO
	sj-iport-5.cisco.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750785AbWEZUCq (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 26 May 2006 16:02:46 -0400
To: "Amit S. Kale" <amitkale@linsyssoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <200605261116.50176.amitkale@linsyssoft.com> (Amit S. Kale's message of "Fri, 26 May 2006 11:16:49 +0530")
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

    Amit> We'll implement the minor changes rightaway and post an
    Amit> update. We are also thinking about what's the best way to
    Amit> incorporate the data structure changes you have
    Amit> suggested. Will post a reply on that too soon.

By the way, my suggestion to the original posting still stands: use a
descriptive subject line and include a changelog entry for each patch
that you expect to be merged.

 - R.