From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
general@lists.openfabrics.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH RFC] RDMA/CMA: Allocate PS_TCP ports from the host TCP port space.
Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2007 20:11:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adaabss41ik.fsf@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46C3B5EF.5060409@garzik.org> (Jeff Garzik's message of "Wed, 15 Aug 2007 22:26:55 -0400")
> Needing to reach out of the RDMA sandbox and reserve net stack
> resources away from itself travels a path we've consistently avoided.
Where did the idea of an "RDMA sandbox" come from? Obviously no one
disagrees with keeping things clean and maintainable, but the idea
that RDMA is a second-class citizen that doesn't get any input into
the evolution of the networking code seems kind of offensive to me.
- R.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-16 3:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-07 14:37 [ofa-general] [PATCH RFC] RDMA/CMA: Allocate PS_TCP ports from the host TCP port space Steve Wise
2007-08-07 14:54 ` [ofa-general] " Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-08-07 15:06 ` Steve Wise
2007-08-07 15:39 ` [ofa-general] " Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-08-09 18:49 ` Steve Wise
2007-08-09 21:40 ` Sean Hefty
2007-08-09 21:55 ` David Miller
2007-08-09 23:22 ` Sean Hefty
2007-08-15 14:42 ` Steve Wise
2007-08-16 2:26 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-08-16 3:11 ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2007-08-16 3:27 ` [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH RFC] RDMA/CMA: Allocate PS_TCP portsfrom " Sean Hefty
2007-08-16 13:43 ` [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH RFC] RDMA/CMA: Allocate PS_TCP ports from " Tom Tucker
2007-08-16 21:17 ` David Miller
2007-08-17 19:52 ` Roland Dreier
2007-08-17 21:27 ` David Miller
2007-08-17 23:31 ` Roland Dreier
2007-08-18 0:00 ` David Miller
2007-08-18 5:23 ` Roland Dreier
2007-08-18 6:44 ` David Miller
2007-08-19 7:01 ` [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH RFC] RDMA/CMA: Allocate PS_TCP portsfrom " Sean Hefty
2007-08-19 7:23 ` David Miller
2007-08-19 17:33 ` [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH RFC] RDMA/CMA: Allocate PS_TCPportsfrom " Felix Marti
2007-08-19 19:32 ` David Miller
2007-08-19 19:49 ` Felix Marti
2007-08-19 23:04 ` David Miller
2007-08-20 0:32 ` Felix Marti
2007-08-20 0:40 ` David Miller
2007-08-20 0:47 ` Felix Marti
2007-08-20 1:05 ` David Miller
2007-08-20 1:41 ` Felix Marti
2007-08-20 11:07 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-20 16:26 ` Felix Marti
2007-08-20 19:16 ` Rick Jones
2007-08-20 9:43 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-08-20 16:53 ` Felix Marti
2007-08-20 18:10 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-20 19:02 ` Felix Marti
2007-08-20 20:18 ` Thomas Graf
2007-08-20 20:33 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-20 20:33 ` Patrick Geoffray
2007-08-21 4:21 ` Felix Marti
2007-08-19 23:27 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-19 23:12 ` David Miller
2007-08-20 1:45 ` Felix Marti
2007-08-20 0:18 ` Herbert Xu
2007-08-20 4:31 ` [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH RFC] RDMA/CMA: Allocate PS_TCP portsfrom " ssufficool
2007-08-21 1:16 ` [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH RFC] RDMA/CMA: Allocate PS_TCP ports from " Roland Dreier
2007-08-21 6:58 ` David Miller
2007-10-08 21:54 ` Steve Wise
2007-10-09 13:44 ` James Lentini
2007-10-10 21:01 ` Sean Hefty
2007-10-10 23:04 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adaabss41ik.fsf@cisco.com \
--to=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=general@lists.openfabrics.org \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).