From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Dreier Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6 v2] IB: IP address based RDMA connection manager Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 07:43:28 -0800 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, openib-general@openib.org Return-path: To: "Sean Hefty" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: openib-general-bounces@openib.org Errors-To: openib-general-bounces@openib.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org It seems that cma_detach_from_dev(): > +static void cma_detach_from_dev(struct rdma_id_private *id_priv) > +{ > + list_del(&id_priv->list); > + if (atomic_dec_and_test(&id_priv->cma_dev->refcount)) > + wake_up(&id_priv->cma_dev->wait); > + id_priv->cma_dev = NULL; > +} doesn't need to do atomic_dec_and_test(), because it is never dropping the last reference to id_priv (and in fact if it was, the last line would be a use-after-free bug). Does it make sense to replace it with: static void cma_detach_from_dev(struct rdma_id_private *id_priv) { list_del(&id_priv->list); /* * cma_detach_from_dev() will never be dropping the last * reference to id_priv, so no need to test here. */ atomic_dec(&id_priv->cma_dev->refcount); id_priv->cma_dev = NULL; } on my x86_64 build that's worth add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-40 (-40) function old new delta cma_detach_from_dev 106 66 -40 - R.