From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Dreier Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/1] cxgb3i: cxgb3 iSCSI initiator Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:41:16 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20080809.224637.69833549.davem@davemloft.net> <48A08145.6060703@hp.com> <20080811.141254.165409473.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: rick.jones2@hp.com, jgarzik@pobox.com, swise@opengridcomputing.com, divy@chelsio.com, kxie@chelsio.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, open-iscsi@googlegroups.com, michaelc@cs.wisc.edu, daisyc@us.ibm.com, wenxiong@us.ibm.com, bhua@us.ibm.com, dm@chelsio.com, leedom@chelsio.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20080811.141254.165409473.davem@davemloft.net> (David Miller's message of "Mon, 11 Aug 2008 14:12:54 -0700 (PDT)") Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org > > Probably depends on whether or not the iSCSI offload solutions are doing > > zero-copy receive into the filecache? > > That's a data placement issue, which also can be solved with > stateless offloading. How can you place iSCSI data properly with only stateless offloads? - R.