From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
To: Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
general@lists.openfabrics.org
Subject: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH 1/2] IPoIB: Fix unregister_netdev hang
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 20:30:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adak5qnjpr7.fsf@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF402F2662.AACCDAF2-ON6525735B.00108C17-6525735B.0012AB74@in.ibm.com> (Krishna Kumar2's message of "Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:53:55 +0530")
> > and I think that is only in Dave's net-2.6.24 tree now, right?
>
> Nope, that was what I downloaded yesterday:
>
> VERSION = 2
> PATCHLEVEL = 6
> SUBLEVEL = 23
> EXTRAVERSION =-rc6
> NAME = Pink Farting Weasel
Please double check your tree. I just very carefully looked at my
trees, and the poll_more: label is added in commit 6b460a71 ("[NET]:
Make NAPI polling independent of struct net_device objects.") which is
only in the net-2.6.24 tree. Of course Dave did not change the
version information in the Makefile since he wouldn't want Linus to
pick up any extra strange changes when he pulls, so a net-2.6.24 tree
will look like 2.6.23-rc6 as you quoted.
And the refcounting bug I fixed is only in net-2.6.24.
> To be clear, netif_rx_schedule while we are still in the poll list will not
> do any harm as it does nothing since NAPI_STATE_SCHED is still set (cleared
> by netif_rx_complete which has not yet run). Effectively we lost/delayed
> processing an interrupt, if I understood the code right.
Right, we lose an interrupt, and since the CQ events are one-shot, we
never get another one, and the interface is effectively dead.
- R.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-19 3:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-18 11:18 [ofa-general] [PATCH 1/2] IPoIB: Fix unregister_netdev hang Krishna Kumar
2007-09-18 11:18 ` [ofa-general] [PATCH 2/2] IPoIB: Code cleanup Krishna Kumar
2007-09-18 14:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] IPoIB: Fix unregister_netdev hang Roland Dreier
2007-09-19 3:23 ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-09-19 3:30 ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2007-09-19 4:24 ` [ofa-general] " Krishna Kumar2
2007-09-18 17:58 ` [PATCH net-2.6.24] Fix refcounting problem with netif_rx_reschedule() Roland Dreier
2007-09-18 18:04 ` [ofa-general] [PATCH net-2.6.24] Fix documentation for dev_put()/dev_hold() Roland Dreier
2007-09-18 20:16 ` David Miller
2007-09-18 20:15 ` [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH net-2.6.24] Fix refcounting problem with netif_rx_reschedule() David Miller
2007-09-18 22:46 ` Roland Dreier
2007-09-18 22:50 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adak5qnjpr7.fsf@cisco.com \
--to=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=general@lists.openfabrics.org \
--cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).