From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
To: Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, general@lists.openfabrics.org,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] IPoIB: Fix unregister_netdev hang
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 07:27:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adalkb4kq0j.fsf@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070918111803.1769.60619.sendpatchset@localhost.localdomain> (Krishna Kumar's message of "Tue, 18 Sep 2007 16:48:03 +0530")
Thanks for testing on ehca...
> While using IPoIB over EHCA (rc6 bits), unregister_netdev hangs with
I don't think you're actually using rc6 bits, since in your patch you have:
> -poll_more:
and I think that is only in Dave's net-2.6.24 tree now, right?
> The problem is that the poll handler does netif_rx_complete (which
> does a dev_put) followed by netif_rx_reschedule() to schedule for
> more receives (which again does a dev_put). This reduces refcount to
> < 0 (depending on how many times netif_rx_complete followed by
> netif_rx_reschedule was called).
Dave, the real problem seems to be that netif_rx_recschedule() calls
__napi_schedule() rather than __netif_rx_schedule(), so it misses the
call to dev_hold() that is needed to balance the dev_put() in
netif_rx_complete(). The current netif_rx_reschedule() looks like it
really should be napi_reschedule(), and we need a new function that
takes a netdev too. Or am I misunderstanding the refcounting?
I'll send a patch once I've had some breakfast and had a chance to at
least compile it...
Krishna, unfortunately your proposed fix has a race:
> - netif_rx_complete(dev, napi);
> - if (unlikely(ib_req_notify_cq(priv->cq,
> - IB_CQ_NEXT_COMP |
> - IB_CQ_REPORT_MISSED_EVENTS)) &&
> - netif_rx_reschedule(napi))
> - goto poll_more;
> + if (likely(!ib_req_notify_cq(priv->cq,
> + IB_CQ_NEXT_COMP |
> + IB_CQ_REPORT_MISSED_EVENTS)))
It is possible for an interrupt to happen immediately right here,
before the netif_rx_complete(), so that netif_rx_schedule() gets
called while we are still on the poll list.
> + netif_rx_complete(dev, napi);
- R.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-18 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-18 11:18 [ofa-general] [PATCH 1/2] IPoIB: Fix unregister_netdev hang Krishna Kumar
2007-09-18 11:18 ` [ofa-general] [PATCH 2/2] IPoIB: Code cleanup Krishna Kumar
2007-09-18 14:27 ` Roland Dreier [this message]
2007-09-19 3:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] IPoIB: Fix unregister_netdev hang Krishna Kumar2
2007-09-19 3:30 ` [ofa-general] " Roland Dreier
2007-09-19 4:24 ` Krishna Kumar2
2007-09-18 17:58 ` [PATCH net-2.6.24] Fix refcounting problem with netif_rx_reschedule() Roland Dreier
2007-09-18 18:04 ` [ofa-general] [PATCH net-2.6.24] Fix documentation for dev_put()/dev_hold() Roland Dreier
2007-09-18 20:16 ` David Miller
2007-09-18 20:15 ` [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH net-2.6.24] Fix refcounting problem with netif_rx_reschedule() David Miller
2007-09-18 22:46 ` Roland Dreier
2007-09-18 22:50 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adalkb4kq0j.fsf@cisco.com \
--to=rdreier@cisco.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=general@lists.openfabrics.org \
--cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).