From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Dreier Subject: Re: setsockopt() Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:03:26 -0700 Message-ID: References: <48725DFE.6000504@citi.umich.edu> <20080707142408.43aa2a2e@extreme> <48728B09.1050801@citi.umich.edu> <20080707.144912.76654646.davem@davemloft.net> <20080708045443.GA7726@2ka.mipt.ru> <20080708020235.388a7bd5.billfink@mindspring.com> <20080708064324.GA11776@2ka.mipt.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Bill Fink , David Miller , aglo@citi.umich.edu, shemminger@vyatta.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, rees@umich.edu, bfields@fieldses.org To: Evgeniy Polyakov Return-path: Received: from sj-iport-1.cisco.com ([171.71.176.70]:26304 "EHLO sj-iport-1.cisco.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751707AbYGHHD2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jul 2008 03:03:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080708064324.GA11776@2ka.mipt.ru> (Evgeniy Polyakov's message of "Tue, 8 Jul 2008 10:43:24 +0400") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > Maybe nuttcp by default sets very small socket buffer size? strace shows no setsockopt() calls other than SO_REUSEADDR in the default case. - R.