From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Dreier Subject: [ofa-general] Re: [PATCH 2.6.22 5/5] iw_cxgb3: Update required firmware revision to 4.0.0. Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 20:12:42 -0700 Message-ID: References: <20070426202057.24234.56383.stgit@dell3.ogc.int> <20070426202126.24234.71523.stgit@dell3.ogc.int> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, general@lists.openfabrics.org, divy@chelsio.com, jeff@garzik.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Steve Wise Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070426202126.24234.71523.stgit@dell3.ogc.int> (Steve Wise's message of "Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:21:26 -0500") List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org Errors-To: general-bounces@lists.openfabrics.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org > Update required firmware revision to 4.0.0. Hmm... should we fold this into the earlier patch, which actually needs this new FW? Or at least merge this patch first? Also, is it cool with everyone to require a new FW, even for users who might not be using (or even building) the RDMA driver? I'm not sure what a good solution would be really, so maybe the pain of forcing everyone to update FW is the least bad thing to do. - R.