From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Dreier Subject: Re: [PATCH] mlx4_en: added pci_device_id table Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:37:37 -0700 Message-ID: References: <4A2E5B5B.7060701@mellanox.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Tziporet Koren To: Yevgeny Petrilin Return-path: Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com ([171.71.176.117]:51757 "EHLO sj-iport-6.cisco.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750856AbZFJEhf (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:37:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4A2E5B5B.7060701@mellanox.co.il> (Yevgeny Petrilin's message of "Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:53:47 +0300") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Interesting approach... > + { PCI_VDEVICE(MELLANOX, 0x6340) }, /* MT25408 "Hermon" SDR */ > + { PCI_VDEVICE(MELLANOX, 0x634a) }, /* MT25408 "Hermon" DDR */ > + { PCI_VDEVICE(MELLANOX, 0x6354) }, /* MT25408 "Hermon" QDR */ > + { PCI_VDEVICE(MELLANOX, 0x6732) }, /* MT25408 "Hermon" DDR PCIe gen2 */ > + { PCI_VDEVICE(MELLANOX, 0x673c) }, /* MT25408 "Hermon" QDR PCIe gen2 */ does it make sense to load mlx4_en for these IB devices? - R.