From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roland Dreier Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/ipoib: Bound the net device to the ipoib_neigh structue Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 11:31:30 -0700 Message-ID: References: <11916151232222-git-send-email-fubar@us.ibm.com> <470C200D.4010705@pobox.com> <470C2343.1020800@garzik.org> <20071009.181246.41634534.davem@davemloft.net> <706.1191979132@death> <470CF7E1.6060503@voltaire.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jay Vosburgh , jeff@garzik.org, David Miller , ogerlitz@voltaire.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Moni Shoua Return-path: Received: from sj-iport-2-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.71]:47884 "EHLO sj-iport-2.cisco.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752111AbXJJSbh (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:31:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <470CF7E1.6060503@voltaire.com> (Moni Shoua's message of "Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:03:45 +0200") Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org > I also ran a test for the code in the branch of 2.6.24 and found a problem. > I see that ifconfig down doesn't return (for IPoIB interfaces) and it's stuck in napi_disable() in the kernel (any idea why?) For what it's worth, I took the upstream 2.6.23 git tree and merged in Dave's latest net-2.6.24 tree and my latest for-2.6.24 tree and tried that. I brought up an IPoIB interface, sent a few pings, and did ifconfig down, and it worked fine. Can you try the same thing without the bonding patches to see if your setup works OK too? Also can you give more details about what you do to get ifconfig down stuck? - R.