From: Nicolai Buchwitz <nb@tipi-net.de>
To: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
Cc: opendmb@gmail.com, florian.fainelli@broadcom.com,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com,
justin.chen@broadcom.com, pierremarinleclercq88@gmail.com,
f.fainelli@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 5/8] net: bcmgenet: derive the receive buffer length from the MTU
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2026 12:07:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <adbf20dcce3c19e4731a0ad0bace8fd1@tipi-net.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179145241305.434549.6513642342117691943@kernel.org>
On 8.10.2026 11:40, netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
> issue(s) to consider.
>
> Critical: 0 · High: 0 · Medium: 1 · Low: 0
>
> If you believe none of the issues are legitimate, please reply to each
> issue of Medium severity or higher and explain why the AI is wrong.
> If any of them are legitimate and you plan to respin, please let
> patchwork
> know by including "pw-bot: cr" as a separate line at the end of your
> reply
> (one such reply per series is enough).
>
> - [Medium] In bcmgenet_set_mtu_regs()
> (drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c), UMAC_MAX_FRAME_LEN…
>
> --
>
> net: bcmgenet: derive the receive buffer length from the MTU
>
> This commit computes the RBUF packet ready threshold from the MTU and
> derives the receive buffer length from it, replacing the fixed 2048
> byte
> RX_BUF_LENGTH. UMAC_MAX_FRAME_LEN and the TDMA flow period are now also
> derived from the MTU, and the TBUF threshold is programmed at its
> maximum.
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c
>> index 83ffc4a2a2a72..4a4b0c46f8986 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/genet/bcmgenet.c
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> @@ -2630,6 +2648,44 @@ static void bcmgenet_link_intr_enable(struct
>> bcmgenet_priv *priv)
>
> [ ... ]
>
>> +/* Program the MTU dependent registers. Call with the MAC disabled.
>> */
>> +static void bcmgenet_set_mtu_regs(struct bcmgenet_priv *priv,
>> unsigned int mtu)
>> +{
>> + u32 thld = bcmgenet_pkt_rdy_thld(mtu);
>> +
>> + bcmgenet_umac_writel(priv, ENET_MAX_FRAME_LEN(mtu),
>> UMAC_MAX_FRAME_LEN);
>
> [Severity: Medium]
>
> Will this drop standard size frames once the MTU is lowered?
>
> Before this patch, UMAC_MAX_FRAME_LEN was always 1536. Now it is
> ENET_MAX_FRAME_LEN(mtu), which is mtu + 36, and nothing keeps it from
> going lower.
>
> The commit message says:
>
> The MTU is still fixed at ETH_DATA_LEN
>
> Only the upper bound is fixed, though. bcmgenet does not override
> min_mtu, so ether_setup() still allows any MTU from 68 up to 1500:
>
> net/ethernet/eth.c:ether_setup() {
> ...
> dev->min_mtu = ETH_MIN_MTU;
> dev->max_mtu = ETH_DATA_LEN;
> ...
> }
>
> This commit has no ndo_change_mtu, so __netif_set_mtu() only updates
> dev->mtu. The next open or full resume then writes the smaller value:
>
> init_umac()
> bcmgenet_set_mtu_regs(priv, priv->dev->mtu)
> bcmgenet_umac_writel(priv, ENET_MAX_FRAME_LEN(mtu),
> UMAC_MAX_FRAME_LEN)
>
> Take an MTU below about 1482, for example 1400 for a tunnel overlay, or
> 1280. Full size 1514/1518 byte frames from LAN peers would then be over
> the MAC limit. They would get DMA_RX_LG and be dropped in
> bcmgenet_desc_rx():
>
> if (dma_flag & DMA_RX_LG)
> u64_stats_inc(&stats->length_errors);
> ...
> page_pool_put_full_page(ring->page_pool, rx_page,
> true);
>
> Before this patch, the MAC accepted these frames whatever the MTU was.
> Full size UDP, broadcast, multicast or forwarded traffic that used to
> be
> received would now be lost.
>
> This still happens at the end of the series. The later commit "net:
> bcmgenet: allow the MTU to be changed" adds bcmgenet_change_mtu(),
> which
> applies the smaller limit straight away on a running interface.
>
> That later commit does fix two related cases here. One is the stale,
> too-small limit left after raising the MTU on a running interface. The
> other is the WoL fast resume mismatch between TDMA_FLOW_PERIOD and
> UMAC_MAX_FRAME_LEN.
>
> Would it work to program max(mtu, ETH_DATA_LEN) into
> UMAC_MAX_FRAME_LEN,
> and to update the commit message to match?
Sure. Will do in v4
---
pw-bot: cr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-08 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-07 8:51 [PATCH net-next v3 0/8] net: bcmgenet: support larger MTUs Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-10-07 8:51 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/8] net: bcmgenet: ring the doorbell when the last frame of a batch is dropped Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-10-07 8:51 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/8] net: bcmgenet: let the caller decide whether to start the PHY Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-10-07 8:51 ` [PATCH net-next v3 3/8] net: bcmgenet: allow a continuation descriptor without the alignment pad Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-10-07 8:51 ` [PATCH net-next v3 4/8] net: bcmgenet: rename ENET_MAX_MTU_SIZE to ENET_MAX_FRAME_LEN Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-10-07 8:51 ` [PATCH net-next v3 5/8] net: bcmgenet: derive the receive buffer length from the MTU Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-10-08 9:40 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-08 10:07 ` Nicolai Buchwitz [this message]
2026-10-07 8:51 ` [PATCH net-next v3 6/8] net: bcmgenet: pad transmit frames out of the packet ready window Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-10-08 9:40 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-08 10:03 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-10-07 8:51 ` [PATCH net-next v3 7/8] net: bcmgenet: allow the MTU to be changed Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-10-08 9:40 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-08 10:17 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-10-07 8:51 ` [PATCH net-next v3 8/8] net: bcmgenet: reassemble jumbo frames from status block fragments Nicolai Buchwitz
2026-10-07 8:56 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/8] net: bcmgenet: support larger MTUs netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-08 8:02 ` Nicolai Buchwitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=adbf20dcce3c19e4731a0ad0bace8fd1@tipi-net.de \
--to=nb@tipi-net.de \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=dave.stevenson@raspberrypi.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=justin.chen@broadcom.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=opendmb@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pierremarinleclercq88@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox