Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 1/6] net: bridge: add locked entry fdb flag to extend locked port feature

[netdev@kapio-technology.com]

On 2022-08-27 17:19, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> 
> How about the below (untested):
> 
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c
> index 68b3e850bcb9..9143a94a1c57 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_input.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c
> @@ -109,9 +109,18 @@ int br_handle_frame_finish(struct net *net,
> struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb
>                 struct net_bridge_fdb_entry *fdb_src =
>                         br_fdb_find_rcu(br, eth_hdr(skb)->h_source, 
> vid);
> 
> -               if (!fdb_src || READ_ONCE(fdb_src->dst) != p ||
> -                   test_bit(BR_FDB_LOCAL, &fdb_src->flags))
> +               if (!fdb_src) {
> +                       if (p->flags & BR_PORT_MAB) {
> +                               __set_bit(BR_FDB_ENTRY_LOCKED, &flags);
> +                               br_fdb_update(br, p, 
> eth_hdr(skb)->h_source,
> +                                             vid, flags);
> +                       }
> +                       goto drop;
> +               } else if (READ_ONCE(fdb_src->dst) != p ||
> +                          test_bit(BR_FDB_LOCAL, &fdb_src->flags) ||
> +                          test_bit(BR_FDB_LOCKED, &fdb_src->flags)) {
>                         goto drop;
> +               }
>         }
> 
> The semantics are very clear, IMO. On FDB miss, add a locked FDB entry
> and drop the packet. On FDB mismatch, drop the packet.
> 
> Entry can roam from an unauthorized port to an authorized port, but not
> the other way around. Not sure what is the use case for allowing 
> roaming
> between unauthorized ports.
> 
> Note that with the above, locked entries are not refreshed and will
> therefore age out unless replaced by user space.
> 

Okay, I got the semantics (locked/unlocked vs unauthorized/authorized) 
reversed, so I will go with your suggestion.