Re: [PATCH RFT net-next 2/2] idpf: remove __free usage in idpf_virtchnl

[Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com>]

On 8/4/2026 3:54 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> On 11/16/2025 7:56 AM, Ally Heev wrote:
>> usage of cleanup attributes is discouraged in net [1], achieve cleanup
>> using goto. In this patch though, only uninitialized pointers with __free
>> attribute are cleaned as they can cause undefined behavior when they
>> go out of scope
>>
>> Suggested-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
>> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aPiG_F5EBQUjZqsl@stanley.mountain/
>> Signed-off-by: Ally Heev <allyheev@gmail.com>
>>
>> [1] https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html#using-device-managed-and-cleanup-h-constructs
> 
> <SMH>
> 
> If using __free() *correctly* gives more readable code, why wouldn't we do it?
> 
> The only problem with this function is that it doesn't follow the guidance
> from cleanup.h:
> 
>  * the recommendation is to always define and assign variables in one
>  * statement and not group variable definitions at the top of the
>  * function when __free() is used.
OMG, not sure why Thunderbird showed this as a recent unread e-mail.
Please ignore this noise!