From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-oo1-f67.google.com (mail-oo1-f67.google.com [209.85.161.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68965346781 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 16:27:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.161.67 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776702431; cv=none; b=UGUL94TDoDWb/7qngx+4SChrYZMpyt6r8b6BAM/6rRrwSQWrHnn30S2MDxN3jCtG+Vwf/DNJeEX5PqPwp3w1ZSAv9RKaQH19a6+hkxBMuz8ezU16gnEz/R8f9F0MxRqTAujRhsRPSWvWL9/FWOT+9nxOvBdfKftU5m4pb9AS8J0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1776702431; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dY4fqKECo7eqADZphbJATvq9E4FnAFlZU510YDrjeE4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=hx+qnJo0SItTI3WJCeoVHgdqwAIoPYpdrYkMU1c8ncRIIHbnfNqkS4UJZrXydlr3gTWARQE1sOFbFU6z3J0l3pI9vePjWzpBHY2IXSLgkhLX1k7Y1ptgeMsIJq3e4jEamm5U5x4/xQ5XSnxw7XSWadTBjKuVDtnbZYDzcrLc4q4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=sE1n2UzV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.161.67 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="sE1n2UzV" Received: by mail-oo1-f67.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-67c250805ccso1003462eaf.1 for ; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 09:27:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1776702428; x=1777307228; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Cx+Z1b8A20YiWzWJo1QqCE8ssM1GtNYptzqBgdgASec=; b=sE1n2UzV4f1t/MddfTc8ZVAtW4sVbeXbdJuYBQLhafPzquSAALqD1ITPLEQgTCPX0Y 31wFYAeQ5WLnZ+zStrs8KFhRDHXRNzwdb1CyXPNPWxtHI0Zfw6f2Wk0SKuk6NgdFdt/n r7Y4IT8joLxE63ZmH16QRcjvEzSbyjKcYA2qNkFeWs/rcU7I/AWow8B9SmpEB3r6sqK4 lpJ6n68ANOtTjLiP9azLXA3LnHtHTItF+Pdm8c9Esy6h7ZFUn8FU08S/R1RSIu3zZnRk 4IgooCyU0kSm/Midl7PiQfU5Xzye1uNnmRyQnKa90qAs2wgeIYmWoi7W/oc+jxOrHXQ4 4nPw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1776702428; x=1777307228; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Cx+Z1b8A20YiWzWJo1QqCE8ssM1GtNYptzqBgdgASec=; b=NXIqi0S7Zl1B9hDTH6b6WEUkyInxkxNLB55xOKxo8bWX06oimlpUgXVI4vH56i+u+S cqzZPSRJK2pb3z7wa0vDojX+IJHXwOBVU66WOl2X5ORMrYsR+ZBv9GiVsQnn/mH9LuzX aRuNmxAmHu+iWi25NwmDSzPAv05+5CJOymQz7/dud72mbc8/63OuO/bJrIwz16iDRqSF wE05vTFwJO7I0Si0D5zCE7ikkZymqtJToK0the4Q4s9ypVO7v+XwQwS7IdztndDL/zyN YHyOajzaX9nBP+wLXQ12Kd7ISBEpcE3HGfOLiTj5OONZU3dpVA5R1RwsYuDLcnX6UCbO 9K6w== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ+x75WBaLCoL/qpYQdZP+FLeXhCsXirpaihIL4WEkGciNYqDEc/4jtPMbapyi+N/MaPvIsisAo=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzQ/13Mf4/4CLUCeoL+0uuUTjmUkXBh1HMkii8UNsYuBhFco1R7 zvOKANaif5oBIyG1MGoUipNGnsBbvcSs3D2RWq/PwUZpou6/PC+EjUiU X-Gm-Gg: AeBDietbkJK/WYK6JqdCe/UoME6/GMdXq4s3k5CuuvCMBSFd29paDmGepq0rqnOOBWg qOYH1okhhhV3Uf2P53gHEdPLKCxq/GYNSrgeC+dwUeVjtnof8EDlI2E/80dIobKGyAKy1LTSKh+ kN3nubK2fc1mV00Zi6R80zCjgcmxE2Vwgz06RN4YdbPBGgMhQ2+imrPpEbzWzLLuUg9glOOqPia IkEI9fdXqajjBLAWwCftp5WKJPV5/gfZpbGHp04t5hEiIW9RtX1T3F1sPofE0K0b1uJpkPFL0pl UW7jq9eLX+cJ0Nnnvpp+k7dnl80Qggp3tVT1fXUvVUgu79p2TRmpBPf0W8dCRRkxzQsp+9U5OBu obKsPchI2TS3fcRGRKkn3p8M/JGGYZP/DH8/hn3PsvfgnY+YBZF6lcDsclGXix3lmTiEQ57VWu1 Pb5ev87aYueUutPqgHf1n7kY1pMmWm X-Received: by 2002:a05:6820:f021:b0:683:1323:e183 with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-69462ee4226mr7718815eaf.32.1776702428293; Mon, 20 Apr 2026 09:27:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a03:2880:12ff:41::]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 006d021491bc7-69464fe6d3esm6031932eaf.14.2026.04.20.09.27.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 20 Apr 2026 09:27:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 09:27:05 -0700 From: Stanislav Fomichev To: Jason Xing Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, bjorn@kernel.org, magnus.karlsson@intel.com, maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com, jonathan.lemon@gmail.com, sdf@fomichev.me, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, horms@kernel.org, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jason Xing Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/4] xsk: avoid skb leak in XDP_TX_METADATA case Message-ID: References: <20260418045644.28612-1-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> <20260418045644.28612-2-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On 04/20, Stanislav Fomichev wrote: > On 04/20, Stanislav Fomichev wrote: > > On 04/18, Jason Xing wrote: > > > From: Jason Xing > > > > > > Fix it by explicitly adding kfree_skb() before returning back to its > > > caller. > > > > > > How to reproduce it in virtio_net: > > > 1. the current skb is the first one (which means no frag and xs->skb is > > > NULL) and users enable metadata feature. > > > 2. xsk_skb_metadata() returns a error code. > > > 3. the caller xsk_build_skb() clears skb by using 'skb = NULL;'. > > > 4. there is no chance to free this skb anymore. > > > > > > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260415085204.3F87AC19424@smtp.kernel.org/ > > > Fixes: 30c3055f9c0d ("xsk: wrap generic metadata handling onto separate function") > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Xing > > > > Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev > > Actually, I take that back.. While looking at patch 2 (which always > confuses me with that -EOVERFLOW handling), looks like we set > skb->destructor in xsk_skb_init_misc? So this kfree will do > xsk_cq_submit_addr_locked? Not sure that's what we want? Should we > move xsk_skb_init_misc to happen after xsk_skb_metadata? Ooops, looks like you already addressed these in v2? Let me look into that..