From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch (vps0.lunn.ch [156.67.10.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D93F3D523C; Mon, 4 May 2026 13:02:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777899778; cv=none; b=pJ6u0sd5y6C6J4A+7Ubu7O/rRpbE2/ICpi/+5OPEJGJd6VNzr8TAmJ9CVEyI4KcBRLgZUlFS9JpxX5S8VIW8c4F0aYzwtdn0jBE1/e7jyMiwUAbf5w/lohz7RE2j1/x4VyY6FBotBu7SwHHxIRWY6VXegmCVF0kA2Vs8gLRmXO0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777899778; c=relaxed/simple; bh=N4vXZDn5Df4IJmA509gN41pd7mTXA4BEeaNK0/qv6FE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=bFu0NfOCC9oq929UebfLL4pos6wiNuOGaJDomYl4xI36mDZfhe6CMn5EOvSH4jO0+X1WI3X8jeS03kbhSGg4i/HF3Xxp6hCs67KCl/8/nNoj5o9nN/3/7np4/SrO/NBaDT8alruguNlewl6Wm3fjVec9GSYXw3z6V+sVQnCd+M8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b=L1y8FUFm; arc=none smtp.client-ip=156.67.10.101 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lunn.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="L1y8FUFm" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Disposition:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject: Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:References; bh=SX3xRb+Kf3Kn0aEftvrBv7pyrElY5rmPCe5smBaRekI=; b=L1y8FUFmAY6afj8mS2ps66RKF8 G2ToE3wtuZEdx7g0Kk+e9H8BFA97XLQkqk3qID6UCtFlGUxIi2JydljhfJj1DH6iDaOV+kVIDIful 0sNZTQk+tpZTO4jsQeWo6alSzeyya7tR9Ct1iTSt6uiorDxrxwMZfHZzDfyrKwYtYuYQ=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1wJswo-001GLd-4i; Mon, 04 May 2026 15:02:54 +0200 Date: Mon, 4 May 2026 15:02:54 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Heiner Kallweit , Russell King Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 0/5] net: mdiobus: HIde ACPI implementation Message-ID: References: <20260504074610.40799-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260504074610.40799-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> On Mon, May 04, 2026 at 09:29:51AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > This mini-series is dedicated to hiding ACPI implementation details > from the wider users as they (as of today) do not need to know that. Please could you expand on that. ACPI != OF. They have different bindings, so you need different implementations. Andrew