From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Network oops
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 07:17:20 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: owner-netdev@oss.sgi.com
Message-ID: <aevd0s$gl1$2@main.gmane.org>
References: <3D120EAE.5A0D365E@mvista.com>
	<20020620.173805.55219901.davem@redhat.com>
	<3D133538.60B6810C@mvista.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-net@vger.kernel.org,
   ak@muc.de, pekkas@netcore.fi, andrew.r.cress@intel.com
Return-path: <owner-netdev@oss.sgi.com>
To: george@mvista.com
In-Reply-To: <3D133538.60B6810C@mvista.com>
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

   From: george anzinger <george@mvista.com>
   Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 07:16:24 -0700

[ BTW please start using newlines in your emails, instead of 1,000
  character monstrosities lacking them.  Thanks ]

   On the other hand, I prefer to think of the linux community as a
   group of folks working on making one of the best OSs on the planet
   even better.

Right, and I don't think CONFIG_PREEMPT makes the planet better.
In fact, now that you mention it, I think CONFIG_PREEMPT is a pile
of crap.

   > It requires a full audit of the networking in the new preemption
   > environment.
   
   Any pointers on what to look for would be welcome.

And you go right back to asking me to do the work for you.
What is wrong with you?