* [PATCH net v3] net: ipmr: Fix some mroute forwarding issues in vrf's
@ 2017-06-10 20:30 Donald Sharp
2017-06-10 23:07 ` David Miller
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Donald Sharp @ 2017-06-10 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev, dsahern, Thomas.Winter, nikolay, yotamg, idosch, roopa
This patch fixes two issues:
1) When forwarding on *,G mroutes that are in a vrf, the
kernel was dropping information about the actual incoming
interface when calling ip_mr_forward from ip_mr_input.
This caused ip_mr_forward to send the multicast packet
back out the incoming interface. Fix this by
modifying ip_mr_forward to be handed the correctly
resolved dev.
2) When a unresolved cache entry is created we store
the incoming skb on the unresolved cache entry and
upon mroute resolution from the user space daemon,
we attempt to forward the packet. Again we were
not resolving to the correct incoming device for
a vrf scenario, before calling ip_mr_forward.
Fix this by resolving to the correct interface
and calling ip_mr_forward with the result.
Fixes: e58e41596811 ("net: Enable support for VRF with ipv4 multicast")
Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
---
v2: Fixed title
v3: Addressed Review comments by Andrew Lunn and David Ahern
net/ipv4/ipmr.c | 32 +++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/ipmr.c b/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
index 551de4d..09368a1 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
@@ -101,8 +101,8 @@ static struct mr_table *ipmr_new_table(struct net *net, u32 id);
static void ipmr_free_table(struct mr_table *mrt);
static void ip_mr_forward(struct net *net, struct mr_table *mrt,
- struct sk_buff *skb, struct mfc_cache *cache,
- int local);
+ struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
+ struct mfc_cache *cache, int local);
static int ipmr_cache_report(struct mr_table *mrt,
struct sk_buff *pkt, vifi_t vifi, int assert);
static int __ipmr_fill_mroute(struct mr_table *mrt, struct sk_buff *skb,
@@ -988,7 +988,7 @@ static void ipmr_cache_resolve(struct net *net, struct mr_table *mrt,
rtnl_unicast(skb, net, NETLINK_CB(skb).portid);
} else {
- ip_mr_forward(net, mrt, skb, c, 0);
+ ip_mr_forward(net, mrt, skb->dev, skb, c, 0);
}
}
}
@@ -1073,7 +1073,7 @@ static int ipmr_cache_report(struct mr_table *mrt,
/* Queue a packet for resolution. It gets locked cache entry! */
static int ipmr_cache_unresolved(struct mr_table *mrt, vifi_t vifi,
- struct sk_buff *skb)
+ struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
{
const struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(skb);
struct mfc_cache *c;
@@ -1130,6 +1130,10 @@ static int ipmr_cache_unresolved(struct mr_table *mrt, vifi_t vifi,
kfree_skb(skb);
err = -ENOBUFS;
} else {
+ if (dev) {
+ skb->dev = dev;
+ skb->skb_iif = dev->ifindex;
+ }
skb_queue_tail(&c->mfc_un.unres.unresolved, skb);
err = 0;
}
@@ -1828,10 +1832,10 @@ static int ipmr_find_vif(struct mr_table *mrt, struct net_device *dev)
/* "local" means that we should preserve one skb (for local delivery) */
static void ip_mr_forward(struct net *net, struct mr_table *mrt,
- struct sk_buff *skb, struct mfc_cache *cache,
- int local)
+ struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
+ struct mfc_cache *cache, int local)
{
- int true_vifi = ipmr_find_vif(mrt, skb->dev);
+ int true_vifi = ipmr_find_vif(mrt, dev);
int psend = -1;
int vif, ct;
@@ -1853,13 +1857,7 @@ static void ip_mr_forward(struct net *net, struct mr_table *mrt,
}
/* Wrong interface: drop packet and (maybe) send PIM assert. */
- if (mrt->vif_table[vif].dev != skb->dev) {
- struct net_device *mdev;
-
- mdev = l3mdev_master_dev_rcu(mrt->vif_table[vif].dev);
- if (mdev == skb->dev)
- goto forward;
-
+ if (mrt->vif_table[vif].dev != dev) {
if (rt_is_output_route(skb_rtable(skb))) {
/* It is our own packet, looped back.
* Very complicated situation...
@@ -2053,7 +2051,7 @@ int ip_mr_input(struct sk_buff *skb)
read_lock(&mrt_lock);
vif = ipmr_find_vif(mrt, dev);
if (vif >= 0) {
- int err2 = ipmr_cache_unresolved(mrt, vif, skb);
+ int err2 = ipmr_cache_unresolved(mrt, vif, skb, dev);
read_unlock(&mrt_lock);
return err2;
@@ -2064,7 +2062,7 @@ int ip_mr_input(struct sk_buff *skb)
}
read_lock(&mrt_lock);
- ip_mr_forward(net, mrt, skb, cache, local);
+ ip_mr_forward(net, mrt, dev, skb, cache, local);
read_unlock(&mrt_lock);
if (local)
@@ -2238,7 +2236,7 @@ int ipmr_get_route(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
iph->saddr = saddr;
iph->daddr = daddr;
iph->version = 0;
- err = ipmr_cache_unresolved(mrt, vif, skb2);
+ err = ipmr_cache_unresolved(mrt, vif, skb2, dev);
read_unlock(&mrt_lock);
rcu_read_unlock();
return err;
--
2.9.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v3] net: ipmr: Fix some mroute forwarding issues in vrf's
2017-06-10 20:30 [PATCH net v3] net: ipmr: Fix some mroute forwarding issues in vrf's Donald Sharp
@ 2017-06-10 23:07 ` David Miller
2017-06-10 23:33 ` David Ahern
2017-06-10 23:32 ` David Ahern
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2017-06-10 23:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sharpd; +Cc: netdev, dsahern, Thomas.Winter, nikolay, yotamg, idosch, roopa
From: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 16:30:17 -0400
> This patch fixes two issues:
>
> 1) When forwarding on *,G mroutes that are in a vrf, the
> kernel was dropping information about the actual incoming
> interface when calling ip_mr_forward from ip_mr_input.
> This caused ip_mr_forward to send the multicast packet
> back out the incoming interface. Fix this by
> modifying ip_mr_forward to be handed the correctly
> resolved dev.
>
> 2) When a unresolved cache entry is created we store
> the incoming skb on the unresolved cache entry and
> upon mroute resolution from the user space daemon,
> we attempt to forward the packet. Again we were
> not resolving to the correct incoming device for
> a vrf scenario, before calling ip_mr_forward.
> Fix this by resolving to the correct interface
> and calling ip_mr_forward with the result.
>
> Fixes: e58e41596811 ("net: Enable support for VRF with ipv4 multicast")
> Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
David, please review.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v3] net: ipmr: Fix some mroute forwarding issues in vrf's
2017-06-10 20:30 [PATCH net v3] net: ipmr: Fix some mroute forwarding issues in vrf's Donald Sharp
2017-06-10 23:07 ` David Miller
@ 2017-06-10 23:32 ` David Ahern
2017-06-11 0:21 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2017-06-10 23:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Donald Sharp, netdev, Thomas.Winter, nikolay, yotamg, idosch,
roopa
On 6/10/17 2:30 PM, Donald Sharp wrote:
> This patch fixes two issues:
>
> 1) When forwarding on *,G mroutes that are in a vrf, the
> kernel was dropping information about the actual incoming
> interface when calling ip_mr_forward from ip_mr_input.
> This caused ip_mr_forward to send the multicast packet
> back out the incoming interface. Fix this by
> modifying ip_mr_forward to be handed the correctly
> resolved dev.
>
> 2) When a unresolved cache entry is created we store
> the incoming skb on the unresolved cache entry and
> upon mroute resolution from the user space daemon,
> we attempt to forward the packet. Again we were
> not resolving to the correct incoming device for
> a vrf scenario, before calling ip_mr_forward.
> Fix this by resolving to the correct interface
> and calling ip_mr_forward with the result.
>
> Fixes: e58e41596811 ("net: Enable support for VRF with ipv4 multicast")
> Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
> ---
> v2: Fixed title
> v3: Addressed Review comments by Andrew Lunn and David Ahern
>
LGTM.
Acked-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v3] net: ipmr: Fix some mroute forwarding issues in vrf's
2017-06-10 23:07 ` David Miller
@ 2017-06-10 23:33 ` David Ahern
2017-06-10 23:39 ` Thomas Winter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2017-06-10 23:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller, sharpd
Cc: netdev, Thomas.Winter, nikolay, yotamg, idosch, roopa
On 6/10/17 5:07 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
> Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 16:30:17 -0400
>
>> This patch fixes two issues:
>>
>> 1) When forwarding on *,G mroutes that are in a vrf, the
>> kernel was dropping information about the actual incoming
>> interface when calling ip_mr_forward from ip_mr_input.
>> This caused ip_mr_forward to send the multicast packet
>> back out the incoming interface. Fix this by
>> modifying ip_mr_forward to be handed the correctly
>> resolved dev.
>>
>> 2) When a unresolved cache entry is created we store
>> the incoming skb on the unresolved cache entry and
>> upon mroute resolution from the user space daemon,
>> we attempt to forward the packet. Again we were
>> not resolving to the correct incoming device for
>> a vrf scenario, before calling ip_mr_forward.
>> Fix this by resolving to the correct interface
>> and calling ip_mr_forward with the result.
>>
>> Fixes: e58e41596811 ("net: Enable support for VRF with ipv4 multicast")
>> Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
>
> David, please review.
>
Responded. Would be good for the Mellanox team (and Thomas) to chime in
as well.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v3] net: ipmr: Fix some mroute forwarding issues in vrf's
2017-06-10 23:33 ` David Ahern
@ 2017-06-10 23:39 ` Thomas Winter
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Winter @ 2017-06-10 23:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Ahern, David Miller, sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com,
yotamg@mellanox.com, idosch@mellanox.com,
roopa@cumulusnetworks.com
I don't think we've seen this issue but patch looks good.
________________________________________
From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Sent: 11 June 2017 11:33
To: David Miller; sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; Thomas Winter; nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com; yotamg@mellanox.com; idosch@mellanox.com; roopa@cumulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] net: ipmr: Fix some mroute forwarding issues in vrf's
On 6/10/17 5:07 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
> Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 16:30:17 -0400
>
>> This patch fixes two issues:
>>
>> 1) When forwarding on *,G mroutes that are in a vrf, the
>> kernel was dropping information about the actual incoming
>> interface when calling ip_mr_forward from ip_mr_input.
>> This caused ip_mr_forward to send the multicast packet
>> back out the incoming interface. Fix this by
>> modifying ip_mr_forward to be handed the correctly
>> resolved dev.
>>
>> 2) When a unresolved cache entry is created we store
>> the incoming skb on the unresolved cache entry and
>> upon mroute resolution from the user space daemon,
>> we attempt to forward the packet. Again we were
>> not resolving to the correct incoming device for
>> a vrf scenario, before calling ip_mr_forward.
>> Fix this by resolving to the correct interface
>> and calling ip_mr_forward with the result.
>>
>> Fixes: e58e41596811 ("net: Enable support for VRF with ipv4 multicast")
>> Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
>
> David, please review.
>
Responded. Would be good for the Mellanox team (and Thomas) to chime in
as well.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v3] net: ipmr: Fix some mroute forwarding issues in vrf's
2017-06-10 20:30 [PATCH net v3] net: ipmr: Fix some mroute forwarding issues in vrf's Donald Sharp
2017-06-10 23:07 ` David Miller
2017-06-10 23:32 ` David Ahern
@ 2017-06-11 0:21 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2017-06-11 6:12 ` Yotam Gigi
2017-06-11 22:15 ` David Miller
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov @ 2017-06-11 0:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Donald Sharp, netdev, dsahern, Thomas.Winter, yotamg, idosch,
roopa
On 10/06/17 23:30, Donald Sharp wrote:
> This patch fixes two issues:
>
> 1) When forwarding on *,G mroutes that are in a vrf, the
> kernel was dropping information about the actual incoming
> interface when calling ip_mr_forward from ip_mr_input.
> This caused ip_mr_forward to send the multicast packet
> back out the incoming interface. Fix this by
> modifying ip_mr_forward to be handed the correctly
> resolved dev.
>
> 2) When a unresolved cache entry is created we store
> the incoming skb on the unresolved cache entry and
> upon mroute resolution from the user space daemon,
> we attempt to forward the packet. Again we were
> not resolving to the correct incoming device for
> a vrf scenario, before calling ip_mr_forward.
> Fix this by resolving to the correct interface
> and calling ip_mr_forward with the result.
>
> Fixes: e58e41596811 ("net: Enable support for VRF with ipv4 multicast")
> Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
> ---
> v2: Fixed title
> v3: Addressed Review comments by Andrew Lunn and David Ahern
>
Looks good, thanks!
Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v3] net: ipmr: Fix some mroute forwarding issues in vrf's
2017-06-10 20:30 [PATCH net v3] net: ipmr: Fix some mroute forwarding issues in vrf's Donald Sharp
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2017-06-11 0:21 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
@ 2017-06-11 6:12 ` Yotam Gigi
2017-06-11 22:15 ` David Miller
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Yotam Gigi @ 2017-06-11 6:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Donald Sharp, netdev, dsahern, Thomas.Winter, nikolay, idosch,
roopa
On 06/10/2017 11:30 PM, Donald Sharp wrote:
> This patch fixes two issues:
>
> 1) When forwarding on *,G mroutes that are in a vrf, the
> kernel was dropping information about the actual incoming
> interface when calling ip_mr_forward from ip_mr_input.
> This caused ip_mr_forward to send the multicast packet
> back out the incoming interface. Fix this by
> modifying ip_mr_forward to be handed the correctly
> resolved dev.
>
> 2) When a unresolved cache entry is created we store
> the incoming skb on the unresolved cache entry and
> upon mroute resolution from the user space daemon,
> we attempt to forward the packet. Again we were
> not resolving to the correct incoming device for
> a vrf scenario, before calling ip_mr_forward.
> Fix this by resolving to the correct interface
> and calling ip_mr_forward with the result.
>
> Fixes: e58e41596811 ("net: Enable support for VRF with ipv4 multicast")
> Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
> ---
> v2: Fixed title
> v3: Addressed Review comments by Andrew Lunn and David Ahern
>
> net/ipv4/ipmr.c | 32 +++++++++++++++-----------------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/ipmr.c b/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
> index 551de4d..09368a1 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/ipmr.c
> @@ -101,8 +101,8 @@ static struct mr_table *ipmr_new_table(struct net *net, u32 id);
> static void ipmr_free_table(struct mr_table *mrt);
>
> static void ip_mr_forward(struct net *net, struct mr_table *mrt,
> - struct sk_buff *skb, struct mfc_cache *cache,
> - int local);
> + struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
> + struct mfc_cache *cache, int local);
> static int ipmr_cache_report(struct mr_table *mrt,
> struct sk_buff *pkt, vifi_t vifi, int assert);
> static int __ipmr_fill_mroute(struct mr_table *mrt, struct sk_buff *skb,
> @@ -988,7 +988,7 @@ static void ipmr_cache_resolve(struct net *net, struct mr_table *mrt,
>
> rtnl_unicast(skb, net, NETLINK_CB(skb).portid);
> } else {
> - ip_mr_forward(net, mrt, skb, c, 0);
> + ip_mr_forward(net, mrt, skb->dev, skb, c, 0);
> }
> }
> }
> @@ -1073,7 +1073,7 @@ static int ipmr_cache_report(struct mr_table *mrt,
>
> /* Queue a packet for resolution. It gets locked cache entry! */
> static int ipmr_cache_unresolved(struct mr_table *mrt, vifi_t vifi,
> - struct sk_buff *skb)
> + struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> {
> const struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(skb);
> struct mfc_cache *c;
> @@ -1130,6 +1130,10 @@ static int ipmr_cache_unresolved(struct mr_table *mrt, vifi_t vifi,
> kfree_skb(skb);
> err = -ENOBUFS;
> } else {
> + if (dev) {
> + skb->dev = dev;
> + skb->skb_iif = dev->ifindex;
> + }
> skb_queue_tail(&c->mfc_un.unres.unresolved, skb);
> err = 0;
> }
> @@ -1828,10 +1832,10 @@ static int ipmr_find_vif(struct mr_table *mrt, struct net_device *dev)
>
> /* "local" means that we should preserve one skb (for local delivery) */
> static void ip_mr_forward(struct net *net, struct mr_table *mrt,
> - struct sk_buff *skb, struct mfc_cache *cache,
> - int local)
> + struct net_device *dev, struct sk_buff *skb,
> + struct mfc_cache *cache, int local)
> {
> - int true_vifi = ipmr_find_vif(mrt, skb->dev);
> + int true_vifi = ipmr_find_vif(mrt, dev);
> int psend = -1;
> int vif, ct;
>
> @@ -1853,13 +1857,7 @@ static void ip_mr_forward(struct net *net, struct mr_table *mrt,
> }
>
> /* Wrong interface: drop packet and (maybe) send PIM assert. */
> - if (mrt->vif_table[vif].dev != skb->dev) {
> - struct net_device *mdev;
> -
> - mdev = l3mdev_master_dev_rcu(mrt->vif_table[vif].dev);
> - if (mdev == skb->dev)
> - goto forward;
> -
> + if (mrt->vif_table[vif].dev != dev) {
> if (rt_is_output_route(skb_rtable(skb))) {
> /* It is our own packet, looped back.
> * Very complicated situation...
> @@ -2053,7 +2051,7 @@ int ip_mr_input(struct sk_buff *skb)
> read_lock(&mrt_lock);
> vif = ipmr_find_vif(mrt, dev);
> if (vif >= 0) {
> - int err2 = ipmr_cache_unresolved(mrt, vif, skb);
> + int err2 = ipmr_cache_unresolved(mrt, vif, skb, dev);
> read_unlock(&mrt_lock);
>
> return err2;
> @@ -2064,7 +2062,7 @@ int ip_mr_input(struct sk_buff *skb)
> }
>
> read_lock(&mrt_lock);
> - ip_mr_forward(net, mrt, skb, cache, local);
> + ip_mr_forward(net, mrt, dev, skb, cache, local);
> read_unlock(&mrt_lock);
>
> if (local)
> @@ -2238,7 +2236,7 @@ int ipmr_get_route(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
> iph->saddr = saddr;
> iph->daddr = daddr;
> iph->version = 0;
> - err = ipmr_cache_unresolved(mrt, vif, skb2);
> + err = ipmr_cache_unresolved(mrt, vif, skb2, dev);
> read_unlock(&mrt_lock);
> rcu_read_unlock();
> return err;
Thanks Donald!
Reviewed-by: Yotam Gigi <yotamg@mellanox.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v3] net: ipmr: Fix some mroute forwarding issues in vrf's
2017-06-10 20:30 [PATCH net v3] net: ipmr: Fix some mroute forwarding issues in vrf's Donald Sharp
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2017-06-11 6:12 ` Yotam Gigi
@ 2017-06-11 22:15 ` David Miller
2017-06-12 2:55 ` David Ahern
4 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2017-06-11 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: sharpd; +Cc: netdev, dsahern, Thomas.Winter, nikolay, yotamg, idosch, roopa
From: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2017 16:30:17 -0400
> This patch fixes two issues:
>
> 1) When forwarding on *,G mroutes that are in a vrf, the
> kernel was dropping information about the actual incoming
> interface when calling ip_mr_forward from ip_mr_input.
> This caused ip_mr_forward to send the multicast packet
> back out the incoming interface. Fix this by
> modifying ip_mr_forward to be handed the correctly
> resolved dev.
>
> 2) When a unresolved cache entry is created we store
> the incoming skb on the unresolved cache entry and
> upon mroute resolution from the user space daemon,
> we attempt to forward the packet. Again we were
> not resolving to the correct incoming device for
> a vrf scenario, before calling ip_mr_forward.
> Fix this by resolving to the correct interface
> and calling ip_mr_forward with the result.
>
> Fixes: e58e41596811 ("net: Enable support for VRF with ipv4 multicast")
> Signed-off-by: Donald Sharp <sharpd@cumulusnetworks.com>
> ---
> v2: Fixed title
> v3: Addressed Review comments by Andrew Lunn and David Ahern
Applied and queued up for -stable, thank you.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v3] net: ipmr: Fix some mroute forwarding issues in vrf's
2017-06-11 22:15 ` David Miller
@ 2017-06-12 2:55 ` David Ahern
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2017-06-12 2:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller, sharpd
Cc: netdev, Thomas.Winter, nikolay, yotamg, idosch, roopa
On 6/11/17 4:15 PM, David Miller wrote:
>
> Applied and queued up for -stable, thank you.
>
The backport will need bcfc7d33110b; that commit should have had the
same Fixes tag -- e58e41596811 ("net: Enable support for VRF with ipv4
multicast")
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-06-12 2:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-06-10 20:30 [PATCH net v3] net: ipmr: Fix some mroute forwarding issues in vrf's Donald Sharp
2017-06-10 23:07 ` David Miller
2017-06-10 23:33 ` David Ahern
2017-06-10 23:39 ` Thomas Winter
2017-06-10 23:32 ` David Ahern
2017-06-11 0:21 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2017-06-11 6:12 ` Yotam Gigi
2017-06-11 22:15 ` David Miller
2017-06-12 2:55 ` David Ahern
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).