From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qk1-f182.google.com (mail-qk1-f182.google.com [209.85.222.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22F9B42314E for ; Fri, 8 May 2026 21:29:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.222.182 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778275745; cv=none; b=pZ05vIBUBQ5o6veHvH47qYw7WahOJbvrjGv5xA3GsbDHKYNH2j0O0OVI6Ovlog7nFRtln2q7llZpgZfj2oyNIQuPhsViSemtFLDBcyAmYv4ixvemefDAfCGN5TvmN/rRMQeTTw3f14oOjL2yD6ytgxyn4NP/j4bI5jfJULHHLG8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778275745; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lm4ZsFpNUgwpK3YnX3D6FcdAELUM2A+q69wdbtD9hng=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=C17HxaenQpcpk17/+tazEp3ntW5Z4K4qfx9crcXIaJkjDhxlOqbppcsSMNInzvP/XZuWcd/BxkLPWG1/W7n1j/DbfAaSVSaMJoMn+nOmKd9RLZq68I1EcegcVl+RXGLEVoMciO/szthAo+Fh6hVccLndvJ119wZiR4hv78mV+ws= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=dB1NAApR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.222.182 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="dB1NAApR" Received: by mail-qk1-f182.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-8d65f4073bfso339041285a.3 for ; Fri, 08 May 2026 14:29:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1778275742; x=1778880542; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=/LAF18jiWTLJl8Jwx6HS2JQdllgi/a4OQyHfJwaQg84=; b=dB1NAApRVCzA/GJ3Zsj63KroNB3QF16jAEzm+2Y5Z4Jd6dJRojdXOImqLa5jsJ03kR oM/vSwYadVwGRFXbPLOt3JG+qV+ygFOV00YT6B5e4Fu20iTuJdcv+qvm9D7yn4TZQDzo 3lsUguU7SvDpNkkDK6cKzT4c2pYtv9rVlqvRF6OZqJP7pbuNfdoMwpAq4czB6xxAHT8H 917O/5/cvnid69CWTYlJ3+TNduUJxqIpCx1HHiigYYR7S3fEbAcwboEx8qCQ6cT0KwYY 6k8wF0lJVBkEO+2gBk7UV/0ivXlmvaqhu3wlQhVuzHjXvPqeqhbkQN89BOg7fu3pW1kN bUhg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1778275742; x=1778880542; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=/LAF18jiWTLJl8Jwx6HS2JQdllgi/a4OQyHfJwaQg84=; b=bETz2TxeHPQwEITsu6+c4U/U9LyCiGrXc0yvJXDNvhioslQRK0xrtlVGwJ0XO883yM 9wDbcGW9ICwU/OMv6u6FKUFaS8JJW1xYx02Qr3ZyCY3tdhY6jeqzNQe33NwelRDzrZij huvr22BDKCeCUQAVRS15uSzCm0Bw5sK2Hyj3Hp29XWfP90jPTTd6QzoLQKo71FeFwfwf eHvGghxt+lhrVBEb+PFYdq9TcdZ8PZde7ME/Ux2nvV7ovxgmVDp4j6yzt4em6YQwwBZc 4YUZoZhcCQBpiK0D/xKEFAnngZwuwo2FULbJGHiaA4wV4qEP0l6mycKjN87k8sA/kaCo qw8w== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ90QTX3ML+i8HMn5TAhjc+uFTqy2tcZLWramTnbPqFZDJ8JYQ+j4/MCGCqaBWefuND8kGaK89w=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw630tAeErKj6UHFvfcgtIr61lEV/4gJsxfVjobEoOKv+MOgTDx uV8yd6viQKvgP/XgiexkzKa5tVCO0oZS1hVw1KdKdluOOsx900RnkVRH X-Gm-Gg: AeBDietRfAlLiYGZUXUSrqHCg7ENR0tiBUTFZVH7Xgwaa6+9a2GJ9JZXIir348oR1W8 cD8SQSoMbxkQ1nWcw4UquVrXrRVg/kEUbcM7f/ZwM+Cmc/3sOyl3m8usH4+rFQm7hlKWZfYeGrp QCnQaI5h+I1aHPlxJ/Wk3G1YNqogsfuMDqVJKrvKt5qxdsapwy20aZvcfIaGpEzl8Ce5U5usw6u rOh6BOYN/AFuFRtTYLSyUX3gX8lKaygAXtNzRFKlLE4g9i5RUeC/jLbgFeAnJOjjtA44GdcAOUt zrUQIcu8Oo/Pvu61Gk1hUX1oQZvDVZF4FmzOMZD4DL0bQeU1XfSXeQVXshGO0Ky10OBNzsYQVeR UFo5zCz36T9JwaWM0IOhHNDR19YRcCYb92kLdUB78+ZwbBOAf5uBwfY+li8g8YUxniVyrfhzn+R 4jOH2gYurtiUSniXQ4+SJQkt6D4yUraPQBlf83KNfU12skozDBRZy6QDEFPb9lrhexI+g= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:40d0:b0:8dd:b4fc:d561 with SMTP id af79cd13be357-904d438db5dmr2198955585a.10.1778275741832; Fri, 08 May 2026 14:29:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from devvm29614.prn0.facebook.com ([2a03:2880:f800:1::]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id af79cd13be357-8fc2cd057acsm2596938185a.47.2026.05.08.14.28.57 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 08 May 2026 14:29:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 8 May 2026 14:28:55 -0700 From: Bobby Eshleman To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Alex Shi , Yanteng Si , Dongliang Mu , Michael Chan , Pavan Chebbi , Joshua Washington , Harshitha Ramamurthy , Saeed Mahameed , Tariq Toukan , Mark Bloch , Leon Romanovsky , Alexander Duyck , kernel-team@meta.com, Daniel Borkmann , Nikolay Aleksandrov , Shuah Khan , dw@davidwei.uk, sdf.kernel@gmail.com, mohsin.bashr@gmail.com, willemb@google.com, jiang.kun2@zte.com.cn, xu.xin16@zte.com.cn, wang.yaxin@zte.com.cn, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Stanislav Fomichev , Mina Almasry , Bobby Eshleman Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 3/8] net: devmem: support TX over NETMEM_TX_NO_DMA devices Message-ID: References: <20260507-tcp-dm-netkit-v3-0-52821445867c@meta.com> <20260507-tcp-dm-netkit-v3-3-52821445867c@meta.com> <20260508134717.4ef87ab6@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260508134717.4ef87ab6@kernel.org> On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 01:47:17PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Thu, 07 May 2026 19:27:48 -0700 Bobby Eshleman wrote: > > + /* Virtual device (e.g. netkit) the user called bind-tx on. Must be > > + * NETMEM_TX_NO_DMA. > > + */ > > + struct net_device *vdev; > > AI keeps complaining that we don't hold a reference to this dev which > I think is fine, we're just comparing pointers. Could we maybe make this > a void pointer and mention in the comment that we treat it as "best > effort cookie" (better phrasing welcome). > > Or we should wipe these vdev pointers when vdevs disappear, not sure > how hard that'd be (or whether it's worth the extra state). My guess is this would probably be the simplest way? diff --git a/net/core/devmem.c b/net/core/devmem.c index 644c286b778f..e28fae14c687 100644 --- a/net/core/devmem.c +++ b/net/core/devmem.c @@ -533,3 +533,38 @@ static const struct memory_provider_ops dmabuf_devmem_ops = { .nl_fill = mp_dmabuf_devmem_nl_fill, .uninstall = mp_dmabuf_devmem_uninstall, }; + +static int net_devmem_netdev_event(struct notifier_block *nb, + unsigned long event, void *ptr) +{ + struct net_device *dev = netdev_notifier_info_to_dev(ptr); + struct net_devmem_dmabuf_binding *binding; + unsigned long id; + + if (event != NETDEV_UNREGISTER) + return NOTIFY_DONE; + + xa_for_each(&net_devmem_dmabuf_bindings, id, binding) { + if (!net_devmem_dmabuf_binding_get(binding)) + continue; + mutex_lock(&binding->lock); + if (READ_ONCE(binding->vdev) == dev) { + ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_WRITER(binding->vdev); + WRITE_ONCE(binding->vdev, NULL); + } + mutex_unlock(&binding->lock); + net_devmem_dmabuf_binding_put(binding); + } + + return NOTIFY_DONE; +} + +static struct notifier_block net_devmem_netdev_nb = { + .notifier_call = net_devmem_netdev_event, +}; + +static int __init net_devmem_init(void) +{ + return register_netdevice_notifier(&net_devmem_netdev_nb); +} +subsys_initcall(net_devmem_init); I'm open to either approach. The void* + comment is good too, IMHO. For the notifier, I'd probably want to add a test too ensure sendmsg() kicks back after the device is removed. Best, Bobby