Re: [PATCH net-next] net: hsr: emit notification for PRP slave2 changed hw addr on port deletion

[Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>]

On 4/7/26 3:37 PM, Fernando Fernandez Mancera wrote:
> On 4/7/26 3:29 PM, Paolo Abeni wrote:
>> On 4/3/26 2:39 PM, Fernando Fernandez Mancera wrote:
>>> On PRP protocol, when deleting the port the MAC address change
>>> notification was missing. In addition to that, make sure to only perform
>>> the MAC address change on slave2 deletion and PRP protocol as the
>>> operation isn't necessary for HSR nor slave1.
>>>
>>> Note that the eth_hw_addr_set() is correct on PRP context as the slaves
>>> are either in promiscuous mode or forward offload enabled.
>>>
>>> Fixes: b65999e7238e ("net: hsr: sync hw addr of slave2 according to slave1 hw addr on PRP")
>>> Reported-by: Luka Gejak <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
>>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/DHFCZEM93FTT.1RWFBIE32K7OT@linux.dev/
>>> Signed-off-by: Fernando Fernandez Mancera <fmancera@suse.de>
>>> ---
>>> Note: routed through net-next tree as the next net tree as rc6 batch is
>>> already out and I do not think this is worth to be included in a last
>>> call batch. Anyway, if maintainer thinks it is, feel free to apply it to
>>> net tree.
>>
>> The general guidance is to avoid fixes tag for net-next patches that do
>> not fix net-next specific code. In this case I assume you want the patch
>> landing into stable right?
>>
> 
> Hi Paolo,
> 
> Noted. I wanted to reduce the number of patches on net tree given we are 
> at the end of the development cycle. To be honest, the stable backport 
> isn't that important here, this is a trivial fix that I doubt it was 
> breaking anyone.
> 
> Maybe drop Fixes tag and get it into net-next then? Fine for me anyway, 
> I trust your judgement on this.

I'm seconding such option, as I think too much stuff is already landing
into stable.

/P