public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ruinskiy, Dima" <dima.ruinskiy@intel.com>
To: Kohei Enju <kohei@enjuk.jp>, <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
	<netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, <kohei.enju@gmail.com>,
	Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v2 1/2] igc: set RX hardware timestamps in igc_build_skb()
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2026 17:56:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <af824f5c-2fbe-411f-881e-cad581fde7d1@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260317062205.39406-2-kohei@enjuk.jp>

On 17/03/2026 8:21, Kohei Enju wrote:
> igc_construct_skb() sets RX hardware timestamps, but igc_build_skb()
> does not. This has not been observable so far since igc currently does
> not enable the build_skb RX path.
> 
> Set RX hardware timestamps in igc_build_skb() as well so that both skb
> construction paths provide the same behavior.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kohei Enju <kohei@enjuk.jp>
> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c | 10 ++++++++--
>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> index cad5a26cc84d..79192b02e6be 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> @@ -1964,8 +1964,9 @@ static void igc_add_rx_frag(struct igc_ring *rx_ring,
>   
>   static struct sk_buff *igc_build_skb(struct igc_ring *rx_ring,
>   				     struct igc_rx_buffer *rx_buffer,
> -				     struct xdp_buff *xdp)
> +				     struct igc_xdp_buff *ctx)
>   {
> +	struct xdp_buff *xdp = &ctx->xdp;
>   	unsigned int size = xdp->data_end - xdp->data;
>   	unsigned int truesize = igc_get_rx_frame_truesize(rx_ring, size);
>   	unsigned int metasize = xdp->data - xdp->data_meta;
> @@ -1979,6 +1980,11 @@ static struct sk_buff *igc_build_skb(struct igc_ring *rx_ring,
>   	if (unlikely(!skb))
>   		return NULL;
>   
> +	if (ctx->rx_ts) {
> +		skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags |= SKBTX_HW_TSTAMP_NETDEV;
> +		skb_hwtstamps(skb)->netdev_data = ctx->rx_ts;
> +	}
> +
>   	/* update pointers within the skb to store the data */
>   	skb_reserve(skb, xdp->data - xdp->data_hard_start);
>   	__skb_put(skb, size);
> @@ -2681,7 +2687,7 @@ static int igc_clean_rx_irq(struct igc_q_vector *q_vector, const int budget)
>   		} else if (skb)
>   			igc_add_rx_frag(rx_ring, rx_buffer, skb, size);
>   		else if (ring_uses_build_skb(rx_ring))
> -			skb = igc_build_skb(rx_ring, rx_buffer, &ctx.xdp);
> +			skb = igc_build_skb(rx_ring, rx_buffer, &ctx);
>   		else
>   			skb = igc_construct_skb(rx_ring, rx_buffer, &ctx);
>   
Reviewed-by: Dima Ruinskiy <dima.ruinskiy@intel.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2026-03-18 15:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-17  6:21 [PATCH iwl-next v2 0/2] igc: enable build_skb path Kohei Enju
2026-03-17  6:21 ` [PATCH iwl-next v2 1/2] igc: set RX hardware timestamps in igc_build_skb() Kohei Enju
2026-03-18 15:56   ` Ruinskiy, Dima [this message]
2026-03-23 17:21   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Dahan, AvigailX
2026-03-17  6:21 ` [PATCH iwl-next v2 2/2] igc: enable build_skb on the non-XDP small-frame RX path Kohei Enju
2026-03-18 15:57   ` Ruinskiy, Dima
2026-03-23 17:23   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Dahan, AvigailX
2026-03-19 16:11 ` [PATCH iwl-next v2 0/2] igc: enable build_skb path Simon Horman
2026-03-20  6:05   ` Kohei Enju
2026-03-20 20:30     ` Tony Nguyen
2026-03-21  7:13       ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Kohei Enju

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=af824f5c-2fbe-411f-881e-cad581fde7d1@intel.com \
    --to=dima.ruinskiy@intel.com \
    --cc=aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=kohei.enju@gmail.com \
    --cc=kohei@enjuk.jp \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox