Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net v1 2/2] ice: use NETIF_F_HW_CSUM instead of IP/IPV6

[Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com>]

On Mon, May 04, 2026 at 04:53:12PM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote:
> On 4/28/2026 12:06 AM, Michal Swiatkowski wrote:
> > The hardware is capable of calculating checksum for IPV6 packets with
> > extension header. To not drop such packets switch from IP/IPV6 checksum
> > to HW_CSUM.
> > 
> > HW_CSUM is also used in previous generation (i40e).
> > 
> > Previously HW_CSUM was used to indicate that hardware supports general
> > checksum. Drop it assuming that if the hardware supports it, it is used.
> > 
> > Disabling offload for E830 in case of TSO isn't needed anymore as the
> > check for TSO is done in Tx path just before preparation of the special
> > GCS descriptor.
> > 
> > The commit from Fixes didn't introduce a bug, it just shown that the
> > driver is doing sth wrong with the checksum features.
> > 
> > Suggested-by: Jakub Ramaseuski <jramaseu@redhat.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>
> > Fixes: 04c20a9356f2 ("net: skip offload for NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM if ipv6 header contains extension")
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> Am I correct in thinking that this supersedes (really, properly fixes)
> the patch "ice: enable NETIF_F_HW_CSUM for GSO packets" at
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/intel-wired-lan/patch/20260310150557.1138437-1-jramaseu@redhat.com/
> ?
> 
> Thanks,
> Jake

Yes, exactly. I think I linked it in cover letter, but maybe I should do
it also here.

Thanks