From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 986453A6F05; Tue, 5 May 2026 08:23:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777969419; cv=none; b=SGylEyN8XKBd7BxGlEbuA7ZOP+hlowsypIa6SmeQk70phmnsS36j857tnPbzmVHLcZJB4HjaNYxUOyiHTjucuH0Q6v0cVOWyss5aU+mcsxgln2r7RN+sgDKmK4He81AemAhzbW/SVFcgAIC6tWrJroI6E0jGBwCNHdLe96dSueQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777969419; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1nwZwcd0lw+L3LC6fBbFFthVGiDhYjKf43nqBs4UiIQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=PkmhwBXvC6HF4XVdSAKWJxKfmXvLLUlYta10RITOqbGYLGlIKPciM0AL2MJrrzD1GQQulJDJvPXIApmNtYaksDT6YCPY2ezVMyiklaxZTRDGl9vx5Vfxglvq0zPLMZAvquuQdXLyqm+haoUqjQD/xoiKIXm9tRhE5IN72AWZLI4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=OimqTLy/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="OimqTLy/" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1777969419; x=1809505419; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=1nwZwcd0lw+L3LC6fBbFFthVGiDhYjKf43nqBs4UiIQ=; b=OimqTLy/YahCE6ujYa+CDkEp70PE4CNgyZW4xkHOP0f1MtMVgu419Nt8 IReFdoKJX6Jf+Drh82+LyfrWzw50noHjHMDppH0qMDDkeO0X19HMVAj2Y LjLsqzniKafo1r6+IoJ79EaZGdL3Q147CthpZKOglr96vQyCxNCWKTGCS 3VHC1R1H8wtddq7OP+JCBYMpbX+kMgGC856t5K5kqsk2GDaXMsuUojCUd +T+9L/38IRypg3OTNJ1by/8FF5xKXQ4CvUOkzNKQ0afRs2zwBTFz9OQ9f mDSdolfGt2THKF5HgGthFc5dkPmHJoy7K6Bnys8p9kAnI/ef3uEM9Q8vU Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 2wiXfKnrQYuXfMP5hS9TVw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: U4kDY1NUSyulVAwWQKNCLw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11776"; a="82686151" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,217,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="82686151" Received: from fmviesa005.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.145]) by fmvoesa106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 May 2026 01:23:38 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 5ydEHKiiTBy6ySr5CnKKdg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Jx0TBBiIQjSA/SI2YNKlvg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,217,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="240728858" Received: from vpanait-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.5]) by fmviesa005-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 May 2026 01:23:32 -0700 Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 11:23:29 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Badal Nilawar Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, wojciech.drewek@intel.com, michael.brooks@intel.com, heikki.krogerus@intel.com, michael.j.ruhl@intel.com, thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com, michal.winiarski@intel.com, anshuman.gupta@intel.com, jacob.e.keller@intel.com, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, matthew.brost@intel.com, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com, singaravelan.nallasellan@intel.com, kelvin.gardiner@intel.com, jk@codeconstruct.com.au, matt@codeconstruct.com.au, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, james.ausmus@intel.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] xe/xe_mctp_mailbox: Add support for MCTP transport over mailbox Message-ID: References: <20260504193420.1232842-3-badal.nilawar@intel.com> <20260504193420.1232842-4-badal.nilawar@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260504193420.1232842-4-badal.nilawar@intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Tue, May 05, 2026 at 01:04:22AM +0530, Badal Nilawar wrote: > Add support for MCTP transport over the Intel vendor-specific mailbox > protocol to enable in-band firmware updates for GPU/AMC via PLDM ... > +#include "xe_device_types.h" Why is the location of this inclusion is here? > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +#include > + The above doesn't sound like more generic than linux/* ones. Move it here. > +#include "xe_mctp_mailbox.h" ... > +static void mctp_mailbox_rx_handler(struct work_struct *work) > +{ > + struct xe_mctp_mailbox *mctp_mailbox = > + container_of(work, struct xe_mctp_mailbox, work.work); > + struct net_device *netdev = mctp_mailbox->netdev; > + > + if (!netdev) > + return; This is bad style from maintenance perspective. Use struct net_device *netdev; netdev = mctp_mailbox->netdev; if (!netdev) return; > + dev_hold(netdev); > + > + /* > + * if (mctp_mailbox_rx_ready()) { > + * Get data over MAILBOX > + * Allocate skb and copy rx data to skb > + * Queue skb to upper layer > + * netif_rx(skb); > + } > + */ What is this?! If you want to put a nice comment, format it accordingly. > + dev_put(netdev); > + > + if (mctp_mailbox->running) > + queue_delayed_work(mctp_mailbox->wq, &mctp_mailbox->work, > + msecs_to_jiffies(XE_MCTP_MAILBOX_RX_POLL_MS)); > +} ... > +static void mctp_mailbox_netdev_setup(struct net_device *dev) > +{ > + /* Populate netdev structure */ > + dev->type = ARPHRD_MCTP; > + /* > + * dev->mtu = MCTP_MAILBOX_MTU_MIN; > + * dev->min_mtu = MCTP_MAILBOX_MTU_MIN; > + * dev->max_mtu = MCTP_MAILBOX_MTU_MAX; > + * > + * dev->hard_header_len = sizeof(struct mctp_mailbox_hdr); > + * dev->tx_queue_len = DEFAULT_TX_QUEUE_LEN; > + */ Even for RFC these should not exist in this form. Always add the respective FIXME/TODO/et cetera to explain the commented out code. > + dev->flags = IFF_NOARP; > + dev->netdev_ops = &mctp_mailbox_netdev_ops; > + dev->pcpu_stat_type = NETDEV_PCPU_STAT_DSTATS; > +} -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko