From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30C7D3A257C for ; Wed, 20 May 2026 10:39:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779273591; cv=none; b=Hzd+ZI/XcsqgsM2/R3bgd7sMaxTfTCy3Cpn4SX5VpIZrwwS9WbQWa3zJirib4OSltaHB9f5Zjs8J8AaUqZazn9yqFFKmM2RemvlCZaRFCAX9VF92jfAcwG5GBwALMgv/UGhKOkwGvA9+ZkKNfDO3fUvP7ux7J7a1ZRIZtAMTTmY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779273591; c=relaxed/simple; bh=eUHiWHdMbcMjdbFC/ml9hfj6eOgpoWIDrHGgBD9VobU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kGhBznJHF60VkeDPjEfSl8IWIeZPzkBeOtsPnT0XsaVbenVYYiRq+ihza3rq9fMi82bdsqAz26iZN6IEYKpRgqBFC5hxIptQO23yI8W8VWxYE7cdOUhleKqkRjyI+a/vdJjG4QR4/0zaN/IHTaaQbVIirMC7aQCFubG7XQ7jvlM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=byEb3BSR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="byEb3BSR" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1779273589; x=1810809589; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=eUHiWHdMbcMjdbFC/ml9hfj6eOgpoWIDrHGgBD9VobU=; b=byEb3BSRACQWH5GeQjVUeVtbtAEC2rNIg5nrwGMBAX3T5ZX8eahg9SEK tii7V9t4jqqEIPfqp096Ey5I0i2sQ/nIYv0loBgpj1aTIYW52s/uUfwrs YSHmAOZaW7JoAlfmFvHYpyhzBOeNeD1v4SSOwoygEORxnHcB/zFShhqwP KQi4UBVOVJh495k2AfisyoVB3j3PKJVkQnyJezHjUY/+7vEQPmI5ndHK8 FjJqWg97iOzJZrj3lPoy/Tm/LN6lilBDxTbPOp7Q+vpLbF9/t7mjUOS/R iJp3h1QT1tsrridgw60DoEX/PQDdCOX6Mb/2LwMTc5w3XvA6VBPwiIBeJ Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: QT4hfqdyR0WCiVwysoVkLg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: wjIQ8P3HT+e4YioZPhg0hA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11791"; a="102845325" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,244,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="102845325" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 May 2026 03:39:46 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Y5XtTuW4QHiM0nD4GafOtw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: upJKWnHLQKWxxmesNQlb8g== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,244,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="244422210" Received: from black.igk.intel.com ([10.91.253.5]) by orviesa004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 20 May 2026 03:39:44 -0700 Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 12:39:40 +0200 From: Raag Jadav To: "Tauro, Riana" Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, rodrigo.vivi@intel.com, maarten@lankhorst.se, airlied@gmail.com, simona@ffwll.ch, kuba@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] drm/xe/drm_ras: Add per node cleanup action Message-ID: References: <20260514202839.1888688-1-raag.jadav@intel.com> <20260514202839.1888688-4-raag.jadav@intel.com> <5d52d3dd-2154-48e2-b849-0ca2aa74fb13@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5d52d3dd-2154-48e2-b849-0ca2aa74fb13@intel.com> On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 12:53:52PM +0530, Tauro, Riana wrote: > On 5/15/2026 1:58 AM, Raag Jadav wrote: > > cleanup_node_param() is not registered in case of counter allocation > > failure, which results in stale memory of previous node that isn't > > cleaned up on unwind. > > It is registered. > > ret = assign_node_params(xe, node, i); > if (ret) > cleanup_node_param(ras, i); Is that also true for previous node params (in case second node registration fails)? > > Add per node cleanup action which guarantees > > cleanup on unwind and also simplifies the cleanup logic. > > > > Fixes: b40db12b542f ("drm/xe/xe_drm_ras: Add support for XE DRM RAS") > > Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_drm_ras.c | 42 +++++++++++++-------------------- > > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_drm_ras.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_drm_ras.c > > index 89640ffb1c33..40abde29a26f 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_drm_ras.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_drm_ras.c > > @@ -131,14 +131,20 @@ static int assign_node_params(struct xe_device *xe, struct drm_ras_node *node, > > return 0; > > } > > -static void cleanup_node_param(struct xe_drm_ras *ras, const enum drm_xe_ras_error_severity severity) > > +static void cleanup_node_param(struct drm_ras_node *node) > > { > > - struct drm_ras_node *node = &ras->node[severity]; > > - > > kfree(node->device_name); > > node->device_name = NULL; > > } > > +static void cleanup_node(struct drm_device *drm, void *arg) > > +{ > > + struct drm_ras_node *node = arg; > > + > > + drm_ras_node_unregister(node); > > + cleanup_node_param(node); > > +} > > + > > static int register_nodes(struct xe_device *xe) > > { > > struct xe_drm_ras *ras = &xe->ras; > > @@ -150,13 +156,19 @@ static int register_nodes(struct xe_device *xe) > > ret = assign_node_params(xe, node, i); > > if (ret) { > > - cleanup_node_param(ras, i); > > + cleanup_node_param(node); > > At this point drm_ras node is not registered. Yes, and I don't believe we're attempting to unregister here :) > > return ret; > > } > > ret = drm_ras_node_register(node); > > if (ret) { > > - cleanup_node_param(ras, i); > > + cleanup_node_param(node); > > Ditto Ditto. Raag > > + return ret; > > + } > > + > > + ret = drmm_add_action_or_reset(&xe->drm, cleanup_node, node); > > + if (ret) { > > + cleanup_node(&xe->drm, node); > > return ret; > > } > > } > > @@ -164,20 +176,6 @@ static int register_nodes(struct xe_device *xe) > > return 0; > > } > > -static void xe_drm_ras_unregister_nodes(struct drm_device *device, void *arg) > > -{ > > - struct xe_device *xe = arg; > > - struct xe_drm_ras *ras = &xe->ras; > > - int i; > > - > > - for_each_error_severity(i) { > > - struct drm_ras_node *node = &ras->node[i]; > > - > > - drm_ras_node_unregister(node); > > - cleanup_node_param(ras, i); > > - } > > -} > > - > > /** > > * xe_drm_ras_init() - Initialize DRM RAS > > * @xe: xe device instance > > @@ -204,11 +202,5 @@ int xe_drm_ras_init(struct xe_device *xe) > > return err; > > } > > - err = drmm_add_action_or_reset(&xe->drm, xe_drm_ras_unregister_nodes, xe); > > - if (err) { > > - drm_err(&xe->drm, "Failed to add action for Xe DRM RAS (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(err)); > > - return err; > > - } > > - > > return 0; > > }