From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pg1-f195.google.com (mail-pg1-f195.google.com [209.85.215.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E6A123AE87 for ; Mon, 11 May 2026 14:56:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.215.195 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778511401; cv=none; b=KeitRoBu5Tah5HOi+YdTe3nZSFfnCBm5+B0t0Hi1kXY9GFwu4rjnpQgdmp6OGOA9NXLrICN8pssJHacW3nEbPmMbj+mi01BXTwXU2wP8j8qi2TmT5irEAyA/1ugA/WyPkNBgtCG1jEejsTgbpme0rYUybIUYdskbJfERxS7gl88= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778511401; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nozqZkYqnKNHxP3Iu3Sop6z/onajxYXf0IYlzL4iAmM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=f6Y6RjNNmdRoI3ed/RiRv7VCIzeRUDnfTENr5aInYtnkK6I087BGqApavXXYWnNYDHqUuOtyZg8KqpqDnjnmbN41nINf+Re+iq2f0q5v361xsueKdV4CoiTkQ+qCo5syIwIanRjR0SrVoM1UD9i2q4wn5KpCaiqhOx05i4PBh94= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=F1tLH/Bp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.215.195 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="F1tLH/Bp" Received: by mail-pg1-f195.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-c8028fa6039so2834546a12.2 for ; Mon, 11 May 2026 07:56:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1778511397; x=1779116197; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1/2XYunZZhJOj9243Vaf4F12iOGTyYZHD3g6BpnS6cA=; b=F1tLH/BpqP68bSawJG2Tgwo+t1/bm+oLSP6Ns7lbYuREEBXr856W97T9rWZT12D7H2 pa9RMqg6X5sXFO/VTo3BZEpsbXNYtrM/H5NLNnJvkGsnVO1Kg9CBYyIgtCK3bWUKgIpa BQHgjRNXKHF7YxaNtzM9vfa/r9zTisDU8vZKNfFgvA7k4UDJLjgaNTBlpqek3dmyBg8L RSOAYThEDYa+1ojHwZGfKxPKp1EpQt1PJfGZ9AFJcqX9WzV6SXOAUBFLLMRTFR8YXTly /ULVtA91MllQt9BFpWFhRRuufX6RaUPLHRD6g47IPnF/+kpgEX2BPuxASJ0jJeSlDRet N2Hg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1778511397; x=1779116197; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1/2XYunZZhJOj9243Vaf4F12iOGTyYZHD3g6BpnS6cA=; b=EraQdwDT6IPI4qToQ2TlfpN7HG04IUrGnTa5s7XuDuNOR9xfPl/nkda+gxaz9Fdmjv UxaA4HpLzYBsrBsK7slvDS7GYSIInjBBsI+/5ijMwQVNFnYzExnUY5eozvgijK1K1LLC j0IZhuyyDOciZGvbzDnmPEmhYq7OzgZwlhyCezyF4TI/sfj5Nz4j/+EER4wEfdbMKmVm PwuXd7VYi49S32ig3pDfWK/HF0WP0Ze5U0egSCfz4bLteSBrznBRhiJQ/T15jbhxoL02 jEzG+oe5kDe1d/i1euK5zcraz+ZhMvCzqls9+7hi49rcX2wxsIFI5z/AM5cUY5kTZWpJ 5udw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ8TOQ2fK8BShH3ddhXoPXaHAKfiAGiyoH9HE/9R3BnnHfWhiEr4nds5TSVvPfAPvvtp8UXQA4I=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YysywVXK9hcf1JQCaBf6Kr0b517ddLF5QI0TkYmW8SpgWQijxoU dxLag3+sqPeRTJGZhD0EBNPHRs6xNaCEEMXgvjwoiuXLuSFD3OPBLCFw X-Gm-Gg: Acq92OFVBzxiFV+xii2gCEkGdQSCh9cR/RxAe5yZpIwCfCzmPFjWXZ+5DIEtTtg8d8r p2AX/3SmsY9ib+vBSQOfUtxoZ9yg9RjKTHVclhTh5b1UlcnC//1U5tWcXDhoJjbfQ/8U8I2bWGn dx+AetEbpvEi8tmtoIRacSGJ9uYOAlKwSqf5oglxAbA2Gf21+K3zfw4nugOViANIjG/xjcpDaOh K3LBQTr+xtjCRKQmsGOb6kJ+9ugMaGe56fJCoXFgrE0x5H9+Oo7dU1oQJublzLcFnLCvdwjuwdo Vljk/6C1IGwXVAs8WOgW0GpGuZmzVHVOE4ATuVtBHdh+s8dKoD44Y7FFXSYxLjj7CArdiAqGjkf KuJqDGKI72oNVL2Ks9Pji2nWPWwzsmwdrwV6S6j0ivSnZvIAxJIkLyoDJmXQHuJlzvUR7qqlp98 mmqodF0C9aEfEB/OCi X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:22c4:b0:2ba:e66b:ce34 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2bae66bd563mr171723165ad.21.1778511396945; Mon, 11 May 2026 07:56:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a03:2880:2ff:45::]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-2baf1d4057fsm103030355ad.21.2026.05.11.07.56.36 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 11 May 2026 07:56:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 11 May 2026 07:56:35 -0700 From: Stanislav Fomichev To: Kuniyuki Iwashima Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Eduard Zingerman , Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , Stanislav Fomichev , Eric Dumazet , Neal Cardwell , Willem de Bruijn , Tenzin Ukyab , Kuniyuki Iwashima , bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 bpf-next 3/8] bpf: tcp: Support bpf_skb_load_bytes() for BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVLOWAT_CB. Message-ID: References: <20260508073355.3916746-1-kuniyu@google.com> <20260508073355.3916746-4-kuniyu@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On 05/08, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote: > On Fri, May 8, 2026 at 8:15 AM Stanislav Fomichev wrote: > > > > On 05/08, Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote: > > > When a TCP skb is queued to sk->sk_receive_queue, BPF SOCK_OPS > > > prog can be called with BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVLOWAT_CB. > > > > > > In this hook, we want to parse the RPC descriptor in the skb > > > and adjust sk->sk_rcvlowat based on the RPC frame size. > > > > > > However, we cannot access payload via bpf_sock_ops.data on > > > modern NICs with TCP header/data split on as the payload is > > > not placed in the linear area. > > > > > > Let's support bpf_skb_load_bytes() for BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVLOWAT_CB. > > > > > > Two notes: > > > > > > 1) bpf_sock_ops_kern.skb will be NULL when the BPF prog is > > > invoked from recvmsg(). > > > > > > 2) Access to bpf_sock_ops.data will be disabled by passing > > > 0 end_offset to bpf_skops_init_skb(). > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima > > > --- > > > net/core/filter.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c > > > index 5fa9189eb772..94d07a15b2ab 100644 > > > --- a/net/core/filter.c > > > +++ b/net/core/filter.c > > > @@ -7718,6 +7718,38 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sk_assign_proto = { > > > .arg3_type = ARG_ANYTHING, > > > }; > > > > > > +BPF_CALL_4(bpf_sock_ops_skb_load_bytes, struct bpf_sock_ops_kern *, bpf_sock, > > > + u32, offset, void *, to, u32, len) > > > +{ > > > + int err; > > > + > > > + if (bpf_sock->op != BPF_SOCK_OPS_RCVLOWAT_CB) { > > > + err = -EOPNOTSUPP; > > > + goto err_clear; > > > + } > > > + > > > + if (!bpf_sock->skb) { > > > + err = -EPERM; > > > + goto err_clear; > > > + } > > > + > > > + return ____bpf_skb_load_bytes(bpf_sock->skb, offset, to, len); > > > > nit: wondering whether it's better to use __bpf_skb_load_bytes (which > > wraps BPF_CALL_4's ____bpf_skb_load_bytes) here? Seems a bit less > > magic and used already by dynptr? > > I guess dynptr used it because dynptr is in a different file under kernel/. > > Users in the same file (sk_reuseport_load_bytes() and > sk_reuseport_load_bytes_relative()) call ____bpf_skb_load_bytes() > directly and clang inlined it there (including __bpf_skb_load_bytes()) > while dynptr tail-called __bpf_skb_load_bytes(). > > I see the point (I had to read BPF_CALL_4() macro for ____), but > ____bpf_skb_load_bytes() looks better. SG!