From: Jakub Raczynski <j.raczynski@samsung.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade@altera.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com,
edumazet@google.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3] net: stmmac: Use interrupt mode INTM=1 for per channel irq
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 17:56:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <agNNxTXeHq+4V/kB@AMDC4622.eu.corp.samsungelectronics.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260511180842.0a547a25@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1263 bytes --]
On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 06:08:42PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 7 May 2026 00:01:25 -0700
> muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade@altera.com wrote:
> > - Wire up multi_irq_en via STMMAC_FLAG_MULTI_IRQ_EN in stmmac_main.c
> > so the feature is reachable by platform drivers.
>
> Okay, but where is a platform driver which uses it _today_ ?
> We need an upstream platform that uses this new bit submitted
> as part of the same series.
>
> If I'm completely off, and this new code somehow gets triggered
> with upstream platforms - please improve the commit message.
> --
> pw-bot: cr
>
Please allow me to attach question to this response, but is this patch enough?
In stmmac code there is handler stmmac_request_irq() which deals with
stmmac_request_irq_multi_msi() and single() aka shared IRQ.
If INTM is enabled, does it really do anything if there is no handler within
stmmac_request_irq() that would process all different IRQs, depending how
is it wired on specific hardware? Or rather, shouldn't there be new function
to call request_irq() per DMA channel for that?
There is e9ee910218ffd that reverted basically whole support for above,
so I think this change is not sufficient.
Please correct me if I am wrong. Thank you.
BR
Jakub Raczynski
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-12 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-07 7:01 [PATCH net-next v3] net: stmmac: Use interrupt mode INTM=1 for per channel irq muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade
2026-05-12 1:08 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-12 15:56 ` Jakub Raczynski [this message]
2026-05-13 6:34 ` Nazle Asmade, Muhammad Nazim Amirul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=agNNxTXeHq+4V/kB@AMDC4622.eu.corp.samsungelectronics.net \
--to=j.raczynski@samsung.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=muhammad.nazim.amirul.nazle.asmade@altera.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox