Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Michael Bommarito <michael.bommarito@gmail.com>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@google.com>,
	Maciej Zenczykowski <maze@google.com>,
	Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
	Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/2] ipv4: harden against ihl < 5 IP_HDRINCL packets
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 00:34:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <agOrCj3YoMAxsxYf@chamomile> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1778614451.git.michael.bommarito@gmail.com>

On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 04:51:13PM -0400, Michael Bommarito wrote:
[...]
> Open question for netfilter / netdev
> ------------------------------------
> 
> After patch 1/2 lands, a caller with CAP_NET_ADMIN can still
> deliver an ihl < 5 packet into the post-LOCAL_OUT in-stack path by
> attaching an nftables payload-set rule on NF_INET_LOCAL_OUT (or an
> NFQUEUE reinject on the same hook) that rewrites byte 0 of the
> IPv4 header after the raw_send_hdrinc / __ip_local_out validation
> has run.

There are possibly more ways to mangle ihl in the kernel in 2026, not
only NFQUEUE and nft_payload.

> Construction:
> 
>     nft add table ip mangle
>     nft add chain ip mangle output { type filter hook output \
>                                      priority -150 \; }
>     nft add rule ip mangle output ip daddr <victim> \
>                                   @nh,0,8 set 0x40
> 
> I reproduced this separately with nftables payload-set delivering an
> ihl = 0 packet to xfrm4_output() and onward.  Patch 2/2 covers the
> AH consumer; other consumers that read iph->ihl after the LOCAL_OUT
> hook may be similarly exposed and I have not enumerated them.
> 
> Direction question rather than a fix proposal: does basic iphdr
> re-sanitization after a header-mangling hook belong in the netfilter
> machinery, in each in-stack consumer, or both?

Your patches LGTM, are you suggesting more patches?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-12 22:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-12 20:51 [PATCH net 0/2] ipv4: harden against ihl < 5 IP_HDRINCL packets Michael Bommarito
2026-05-12 20:51 ` [PATCH net 1/2] ipv4: raw: reject IP_HDRINCL packets with ihl < 5 Michael Bommarito
2026-05-12 20:51 ` [PATCH net 2/2] ipv4: ah: harden ah_output options-copy guard against " Michael Bommarito
2026-05-12 22:34 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2026-05-12 23:05   ` [PATCH net 0/2] ipv4: harden against ihl < 5 IP_HDRINCL packets Michael Bommarito

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=agOrCj3YoMAxsxYf@chamomile \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuniyu@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maze@google.com \
    --cc=michael.bommarito@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox