> On Mon, May 11, 2026 at 05:57:39PM +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > diff --git a/include/net/neighbour.h b/include/net/neighbour.h > > index 2dfee6d4258a..c2b6196705ef 100644 > > --- a/include/net/neighbour.h > > +++ b/include/net/neighbour.h > > @@ -487,16 +487,24 @@ static inline int neigh_event_send(struct neighbour *neigh, struct sk_buff *skb) > > } > > > > #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_BRIDGE_NETFILTER) > > -static inline int neigh_hh_bridge(struct hh_cache *hh, struct sk_buff *skb) > > +static inline struct sk_buff * > > +neigh_hh_bridge(struct hh_cache *hh, struct sk_buff *skb) > > { > > - unsigned int seq, hh_alen; > > + unsigned int seq, hh_alen = HH_DATA_ALIGN(ETH_HLEN); > > + > > + if (unlikely(skb_headroom(skb) < hh_alen || > > + skb_header_cloned(skb) || skb_shared(skb))) { > > + skb = skb_expand_head(skb, hh_alen); > > I don't think this is correct... The comment above skb_expand_head() > says that it will generate a warning if there is sufficient headroom in > the packet. > > I assumed that you would just call skb_cow_head() like the AI review > suggested. There's skb_share_check() in br_handle_frame(), so no need to > worry about the skb being shared. Right, I was reviewing it. I will fix it in v3. Regards, Lorenzo > > > + if (!skb) > > + return NULL; > > + } > > > > do { > > seq = read_seqbegin(&hh->hh_lock); > > - hh_alen = HH_DATA_ALIGN(ETH_HLEN); > > memcpy(skb->data - hh_alen, hh->hh_data, ETH_ALEN + hh_alen - ETH_HLEN); > > } while (read_seqretry(&hh->hh_lock, seq)); > > - return 0; > > + > > + return skb; > > } > > #endif > > > > diff --git a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c > > index 0ab1c94db4b9..8d21c88c2116 100644 > > --- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c > > +++ b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c > > @@ -297,7 +297,12 @@ int br_nf_pre_routing_finish_bridge(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_ > > goto free_skb; > > } > > > > - neigh_hh_bridge(&neigh->hh, skb); > > + skb = neigh_hh_bridge(&neigh->hh, skb); > > + if (!skb) { > > + neigh_release(neigh); > > + return -ENOMEM; > > + } > > This part looks correct. > > > + > > skb->dev = br_indev; > > > > ret = br_handle_frame_finish(net, sk, skb); > > > > --- > > base-commit: a450063ef86b9967234ca1f896c0d77400c74f11 > > change-id: 20260508-nf-neigh_hh_bridge-fix-9ab775ee23c6 > > > > Best regards, > > -- > > Lorenzo Bianconi > >