Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 4/4] net: tls: remove bad rollback and UAF on ENOSPC
Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 14:55:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <agXGJ2v-Gnf5trWX@krikkit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a83d79d1-b932-458a-b5fa-1cb623fa03f1@redhat.com>

2026-05-14, 13:18:12 +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On 5/11/26 7:49 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > As explained in commit 54a3ecaeeeae ("bpf: fix ktls panic with sockmap")
> > once we call BPF there's no way for us to rollback the iter
> > and copy data, since BPF may have modified the message.
> > This is regardless of whether BPF set up cork or not.
> > 
> > Remove the attempt to roll back iter completely. This removes a UAF
> > since BPF may have modified msg_pl and rec, so these pointers were
> > stale.
> > 
> > Note that I'm entirely unsure what the expected behavior is here
> > for BPF. Feels like this path must not be exercised by normal
> > applications / existing deployments in the first place.
> > 
> > Fixes: d3b18ad31f93 ("tls: add bpf support to sk_msg handling")
> > Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  net/tls/tls_sw.c | 12 ++----------
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
> > index 360f71fd7884..22b77840e35a 100644
> > --- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
> > +++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
> > @@ -1164,11 +1164,8 @@ static int tls_sw_sendmsg_locked(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
> >  				else if (ret == -ENOMEM)
> >  					goto wait_for_memory;
> >  				else if (ctx->open_rec && ret == -ENOSPC) {
> > -					if (msg_pl->cork_bytes) {
> > -						ret = 0;
> > -						goto send_end;
> > -					}
> > -					goto rollback_iter;
> > +					ret = 0;
> > +					goto send_end;
> 
> The sashiko report here looks like a pre-existing issue that could be
> handled separately.
> 
> Still let me play safe and merge just the 2 first patch in the series.

Kind of. We had agreed that #2 could be fixed in a somewhat better
way.

@Jakub removal of the content_type chaining can be done in net-next as
a clean up now I guess

-- 
Sabrina

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-14 12:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-11 17:49 [PATCH net v2 0/4] net: tls: net: tls: fix a few random bugs Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-11 17:49 ` [PATCH net v2 1/4] net: tls: fix off-by-one in sg_chain entry count for wrapped sk_msg ring Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-12 10:21   ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-05-11 17:49 ` [PATCH net v2 2/4] net: tls: prevent chain-after-chain in plain text SG Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-12 11:09   ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-05-12 16:03     ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-12 22:30       ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-05-13  0:14         ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-11 17:49 ` [PATCH net v2 3/4] net: tls: fix use-after-free in tls_sw_sendmsg_locked after bpf verdict Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-12  9:47   ` Jiayuan Chen
2026-05-12 16:04     ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-11 17:49 ` [PATCH net v2 4/4] net: tls: remove bad rollback and UAF on ENOSPC Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-14 11:18   ` Paolo Abeni
2026-05-14 12:55     ` Sabrina Dubroca [this message]
2026-05-14 14:55       ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-14 15:05         ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-05-14 15:09           ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-12  9:28 ` [PATCH net v2 0/4] net: tls: net: tls: fix a few random bugs Jakub Sitnicki
2026-05-12  9:37   ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-05-14 11:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=agXGJ2v-Gnf5trWX@krikkit \
    --to=sd@queasysnail.net \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox