Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3 1/2] vsock/virtio: reset connection on receiving queue overflow
Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 16:57:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <agXh36gUe1K6__Bk@sgarzare-redhat> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260513105417.56761-2-sgarzare@redhat.com>

On Wed, May 13, 2026 at 12:54:16PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
>
>When there is no more space to queue an incoming packet, the packet is
>silently dropped. This causes data loss without any notification to
>either peer, since there is no retransmission.
>
>Under normal circumstances, this should never happen. However, it could
>happen if the other peer doesn't respect the credit, or if the skb
>overhead, which we recently began to take into account with commit
>059b7dbd20a6 ("vsock/virtio: fix potential unbounded skb queue"),
>is too high.
>
>Fix this by resetting the connection and setting the local socket error
>to ENOBUFS when virtio_transport_recv_enqueue() can no longer queue a
>packet, so both peers are explicitly notified of the failure rather than
>silently losing data.
>
>Fixes: ae6fcfbf5f03 ("vsock/virtio: discard packets if credit is not respected")
>Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
>---
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>index 989cc252d3d3..4a4ac69d1ad1 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>@@ -1350,7 +1350,7 @@ virtio_transport_recv_connecting(struct sock *sk,
> 	return err;
> }
>
>-static void
>+static bool
> virtio_transport_recv_enqueue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> 			      struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
>@@ -1365,10 +1365,8 @@ virtio_transport_recv_enqueue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> 	spin_lock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
>
> 	can_enqueue = virtio_transport_inc_rx_pkt(vvs, len);
>-	if (!can_enqueue) {
>-		free_pkt = true;
>+	if (!can_enqueue)
> 		goto out;
>-	}
>
> 	if (le32_to_cpu(hdr->flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM)
> 		vvs->msg_count++;
>@@ -1408,6 +1406,8 @@ virtio_transport_recv_enqueue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> 	spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> 	if (free_pkt)
> 		kfree_skb(skb);
>+
>+	return can_enqueue;
> }
>
> static int
>@@ -1420,7 +1420,16 @@ virtio_transport_recv_connected(struct sock *sk,
>
> 	switch (le16_to_cpu(hdr->op)) {
> 	case VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW:
>-		virtio_transport_recv_enqueue(vsk, skb);
>+		if (!virtio_transport_recv_enqueue(vsk, skb)) {
>+			/* There is no more space to queue the packet, so let's
>+			 * close the connection; otherwise, we'll lose data.
>+			 */
>+			(void)virtio_transport_reset(vsk, skb);
>+			sk->sk_state = TCP_CLOSE;
>+			sk->sk_err = ENOBUFS;
>+			sk_error_report(sk);

sashiko reported some issues related to setting TCP_CLOSE state and not 
removing the socket from the connect table:
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260513105417.56761-1-sgarzare%40redhat.com

I'll change this by calling virtio_transport_do_close() and 
vsock_remove_sock() in the next version.

Stefano

>+			break;
>+		}
> 		vsock_data_ready(sk);
> 		return err;
> 	case VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_CREDIT_REQUEST:
>-- 
>2.54.0
>


  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-14 14:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-13 10:54 [PATCH net v3 0/2] vsock/virtio: fix skb overhead accounting to preserve full buf_alloc Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-13 10:54 ` [PATCH net v3 1/2] vsock/virtio: reset connection on receiving queue overflow Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-14 14:57   ` Stefano Garzarella [this message]
2026-05-14 15:16     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-05-14 16:45       ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-13 10:54 ` [PATCH net v3 2/2] vsock/virtio: fix skb overhead accounting to preserve full buf_alloc Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-14 14:44   ` Stefano Garzarella

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=agXh36gUe1K6__Bk@sgarzare-redhat \
    --to=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox