From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-a4-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a4-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.147]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CC0831716D; Thu, 14 May 2026 15:05:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.147 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778771131; cv=none; b=uGMvRMv6t6pnTYsDePbRg0NROxczhzl5BSg+S47VnVYSXV+iVVjdjObb9VHryV8N4XGb/3E+egJccCmkadY7+TMO8kTC54uFKlLKlm7FA94Yj3EZ1zSOeO1julUHxhZUSyRygdAVCunb40uYXzbbVK0F953dluxvVaM7Jccg2jc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778771131; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uHXk142rdXP9Quc1HvPGg5PrsaBwyT37DlZuCMCtLw4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Ch/Iel4srkagDJ42lADgM7zeGyE5tEiI/OxLh6+NBjEMj7lx5BXwPJo6Y19QU9bRoASdhnaK5u10DG3V8/sqY8xJimtJMYTbE3fOTKC7AqCTZhPEvBwOgDqWvxDnpRWANukjvCfgwzMB3cONMBSxTMYrcMsWEsoH34x7VrQ/O78= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=queasysnail.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=queasysnail.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=queasysnail.net header.i=@queasysnail.net header.b=W+8VcpKM; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=CvhPvrHw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.147 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=queasysnail.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=queasysnail.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=queasysnail.net header.i=@queasysnail.net header.b="W+8VcpKM"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="CvhPvrHw" Received: from phl-compute-06.internal (phl-compute-06.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAA45EC022B; Thu, 14 May 2026 11:05:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-03 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-06.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 14 May 2026 11:05:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=queasysnail.net; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1778771126; x= 1778857526; bh=t9AFOTY5ZkS/lLxTJk2f8rmgQ3k4DF6eF4A3cXW1DEg=; b=W +8VcpKMukUrOtPLAyC3O8cr43iIuB9WhWs7dGTWI7xd8H6n0ML72V4/AntsWtr+5 HJOZYSe0muYjLh5T/2GVAKWBlaX7Im2uddnd577Nj/CVqDJnmsHELQ1WoP0doDgO +/2aIxkbypS9mI0guBCcrOXDFJiJDzvxglOA2HQsqWyOSv+fAMOs+z37rhFjC+CA z4BSl1+u2j3bQRsrI0zUU0Byt4KwgoKmspbhJV8Rl99CUwJNvEuOrhpW0qqNRI7G q/pNTpscsZ52sk3UD+QjJOHZ3Ic+fqrtZVtEZVZtd88P+8qOVVqcRP8DrFkGE5o4 71CbrpDQbuf55rWXn8I3w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t= 1778771126; x=1778857526; bh=t9AFOTY5ZkS/lLxTJk2f8rmgQ3k4DF6eF4A 3cXW1DEg=; b=CvhPvrHwlXiTzcITz4tXlnhChhsGA0pVZCO/i+dfZZx8OwXliNN 6P3uabJqbfBwFKJR9koN9AWBpax3Z4Z6yraOjBu6HWNJci+E20RWeub/p8yFmKHH NxP9mSi3koQkoBkLQsgDh47QVVdDMWRvWKJORccugS5wt9/iijXFJBxySbNJknqH RGXtvok7LMSVTkKTEUEIQ0G4ss0aV1WX6pTckHyAFTy7n80ninKOq+0LsSL2InIa zK5HD/CgIMwj9ZVCSDnI+oj25dI6H15DhDhrEeYT6I+OvRg055U5enzoG3Q6yECl fDM+9KjzUBrKrO2OOKkWFHNtfw9P2nJhreQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefhedrtddtgdduvdejkeefucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepufgrsghrihhn rgcuffhusghrohgtrgcuoehsugesqhhuvggrshihshhnrghilhdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrf grthhtvghrnhepuefhhfffgfffhfefueeiudegtdefhfekgeetheegheeifffguedvueff fefgudffnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomh epshgusehquhgvrghshihsnhgrihhlrdhnvghtpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeelpdhmohgu vgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehkuhgsrgeskhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtg hpthhtohepphgrsggvnhhisehrvgguhhgrthdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopegurghvvghm segurghvvghmlhhofhhtrdhnvghtpdhrtghpthhtohepnhgvthguvghvsehvghgvrhdrkh gvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepvgguuhhmrgiivghtsehgohhoghhlvgdrtgho mhdprhgtphhtthhopegrnhgurhgvfidonhgvthguvghvsehluhhnnhdrtghhpdhrtghpth htohephhhorhhmsheskhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepjhhohhhnrdhfrghs thgrsggvnhgusehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepsghpfhesvhhgvghrrdhkvg hrnhgvlhdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i934648bf:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 14 May 2026 11:05:25 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 17:05:23 +0200 From: Sabrina Dubroca To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Paolo Abeni , davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 4/4] net: tls: remove bad rollback and UAF on ENOSPC Message-ID: References: <20260511174920.433155-1-kuba@kernel.org> <20260511174920.433155-5-kuba@kernel.org> <20260514075504.1790a187@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260514075504.1790a187@kernel.org> 2026-05-14, 07:55:04 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Thu, 14 May 2026 14:55:03 +0200 Sabrina Dubroca wrote: > > > The sashiko report here looks like a pre-existing issue that could be > > > handled separately. > > Or not, cause frankly TLS+sockmap feels a bit hopeless at this > stage. :/ How long do you want to give Daniel/John (or others) to chime in on the cover letter? (it's been only 2 days, but it feels like much longer) > > > Still let me play safe and merge just the 2 first patch in the series. > > > > Kind of. We had agreed that #2 could be fixed in a somewhat better > > way. > > > > @Jakub removal of the content_type chaining can be done in net-next as > > a clean up now I guess > > Oh, TBH I also thought you are okay with the patch as posted. > I'll follow up in net-next shortly (once Linus pulls). Ah, ok. Fine then, thanks. -- Sabrina