From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CF0B3D47DC for ; Sun, 17 May 2026 22:21:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.152 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779056505; cv=none; b=ROyDRWWHR5iU+tVBrSg4SKqq6jtcL6hmUyAG3rKeZN/DymoD8ccVekenHWMJJ5FglP6AOrxXm8778RqfR+Kv6GtEbJNgbf4v68lyIXfjogvumLTfNiSbOp3Zr5Ul29w8lDa9l9+Il7TfWtkAyfDjEAyuyYK+BFCZx533QlnK1P4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779056505; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1awk/lQ4lWkOa0EChlDQlo+wkTI9IajS9yTS79CR+oo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Y2PRvCtb/KBZuG5jZjfBgFmEQE1VLqhkBb+tQ+MFp9swb/BsWtEjKvBvy7iRAup2wgpZSXtS9+c9CxXFyBD3Nr1JzHIZHECAquT4Qptw57S1eoY2oZAcSKVqxL9EjzuFWYElmBymGcpVUIwKPIjAtBEuGjioOtDwDNgBJ/Tqa3k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=queasysnail.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=queasysnail.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=queasysnail.net header.i=@queasysnail.net header.b=GNwZA6zQ; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=HmOku9ew; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.152 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=queasysnail.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=queasysnail.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=queasysnail.net header.i=@queasysnail.net header.b="GNwZA6zQ"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="HmOku9ew" Received: from phl-compute-11.internal (phl-compute-11.internal [10.202.2.51]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EDD0140002F; Sun, 17 May 2026 18:21:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-frontend-04 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-11.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 17 May 2026 18:21:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=queasysnail.net; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1779056499; x= 1779142899; bh=+cEJ3kbqFxWztaXHBLGBfF2YVqchsnkIgKIuuEf9j0o=; b=G NwZA6zQPTGnK4pYU33fdSbcpfxiBr7IbgExni1MyCF1jOU+Fvb14pUq5JLk2zPRt mD4Eg6EtocM9tRctPT5zJJVfPZ/frRXl4fnPRQfVQL1+dGlCHRDTWGVeQ11zD+IZ U+KvDOlMJ0k9ftAAtp1YpilGbUPfKLsk0xYDRxgqB3+gPU573Oe8CL9jZvuYoHWn W4WJ9xMcmpDeGyLSjkH3v2uryjnyoYwinr43crq8+js9f5gBUBUNPVf9HYUKXn+b mblvPtzBFPSQJ7TCVs2eN/DuEcUjDNqr3N1eLbx65pK1oPghDUfZy0gW7cEIdHlp 944wyd/wzhiIUu0hUAS/g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t= 1779056499; x=1779142899; bh=+cEJ3kbqFxWztaXHBLGBfF2YVqchsnkIgKI uuEf9j0o=; b=HmOku9ewkxXfILJpaa2UUobwOks4RsAyrhsFN4cAkBN3GfxHL5E H8vonWPW6ZeHfnqc+no2rktkx37RwwJI93g8N1wukVkOJbNwF732pWerf6owUdPD ZSV8wxCw0+yoT7l4scHFLoS3Zn5j+4hI+BJf4H2GGkvci8EXcIeQHlIwTAgkPeOJ GISOM/sZ4omcrcMkrEN2eXh4rCwFEZUDL2dpT6lfy/pR28Bs32J+P852ZD7ACp84 W+paN1uG8q770n4XPM0HB5z99mLNfHN2i2PaDzWQk4kjhzUY8ZNCqrRC/FqQuAeO L8E4T+r3BknzqFWl5gxHS6wPTms0Tz+qXdQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefhedrtddtgddufeejudejucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtjeenucfhrhhomhepufgrsghrihhn rgcuffhusghrohgtrgcuoehsugesqhhuvggrshihshhnrghilhdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrf grthhtvghrnhepuefhhfffgfffhfefueeiudegtdefhfekgeetheegheeifffguedvueff fefgudffnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomh epshgusehquhgvrghshihsnhgrihhlrdhnvghtpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeduvddpmhho uggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtoheprhhjvghthhifrghnihesphhurhgvshhtoh hrrghgvgdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehnvghtuggvvhesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgvlhdr ohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehsrggvvggumhesnhhvihguihgrrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtoh epthgrrhhiqhhtsehnvhhiughirgdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehmsghlohgthhesnhhv ihguihgrrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepsghorhhishhpsehnvhhiughirgdrtghomhdprh gtphhtthhopehjohhhnhdrfhgrshhtrggsvghnugesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphht thhopehkuhgsrgeskhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepuggrvhgvmhesuggrvh gvmhhlohhfthdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i934648bf:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 17 May 2026 18:21:38 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 00:21:36 +0200 From: Sabrina Dubroca To: Rishikesh Jethwani Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, saeedm@nvidia.com, tariqt@nvidia.com, mbloch@nvidia.com, borisp@nvidia.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, leon@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v14 0/9] tls: Add TLS 1.3 hardware offload support Message-ID: References: <20260515212715.3151307-1-rjethwani@purestorage.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260515212715.3151307-1-rjethwani@purestorage.com> 2026-05-15, 15:27:06 -0600, Rishikesh Jethwani wrote: > Hi all, > > This series adds TLS 1.3 hardware offload support including KeyUpdate > (rekey) and a selftest for validation. I know I've been a bit slow in responding to your description of what the NICs are doing, the past weeks have been "kind of" busy. I'm planning to get back to this topic as soon as I get a good chunk of uninterrupted time to think about it. But with this repost, the discussion is going to be split between 2 threads. It's better to wait until the discussions are concluded on one version before resending. -- Sabrina