From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
To: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
Cc: <davem@davemloft.net>, <edumazet@google.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>, <horms@kernel.org>,
<kuba@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <pabeni@redhat.com>,
<alexanderduyck@fb.com>, <enewton@meta.com>,
<vlad.wing@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfrm: move policy_bydst RCU sync from per-netns .exit to .pre_exit
Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 12:25:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahV1BxasOuDHX7Zy@secunet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260521102926.2613544-1-usama.arif@linux.dev>
On Thu, May 21, 2026 at 03:29:26AM -0700, Usama Arif wrote:
> The struct pernet_operations docstring in include/net/net_namespace.h
> explicitly warns against blocking RCU primitives in .exit handlers:
>
> Exit methods using blocking RCU primitives, such as
> synchronize_rcu(), should be implemented via exit_batch.
> [...]
> Please, avoid synchronize_rcu() at all, where it's possible.
>
> Note that a combination of pre_exit() and exit() can
> be used, since a synchronize_rcu() is guaranteed between
> the calls.
>
> xfrm_policy_fini() violates this: it calls synchronize_rcu() before
> freeing the policy_bydst hash tables (so no RCU reader is mid-
> traversal at free time), but runs from xfrm_net_ops.exit -- once per
> namespace -- so a cleanup_net() of N namespaces pays N full RCU
> grace periods serially.
>
> Use the documented pre_exit/exit split. Move the policy flush (and
> the workqueue drains it depends on) into a new .pre_exit handler;
> xfrm_policy_fini() then runs in .exit and frees the hash tables
> after the synchronize_rcu_expedited() that cleanup_net() guarantees
> between the two phases. Providing O(1) RCU grace periods per batch
> instead of O(N).
>
> Observed on Linux 6.18 with a workload doing unshare(CLONE_NEWNET)
> at ~13/sec sustained: cleanup_net() and the netns_wq rescuer kthread
> both stuck in xfrm_policy_fini()'s synchronize_rcu(), >300k struct
> net accumulated in the cleanup queue, Percpu in /proc/meminfo climbed
> to 130+ GB on 256-CPU hosts, and memcg OOMs followed. setup_net and
> __put_net counts were balanced, ruling out a refcount leak.
>
> Fixes: 069daad4f2ae ("xfrm: Wait for RCU readers during policy netns exit")
> Signed-off-by: Usama Arif <usama.arif@linux.dev>
Applied, thanks Usama!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-26 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-21 10:29 [PATCH] xfrm: move policy_bydst RCU sync from per-netns .exit to .pre_exit Usama Arif
2026-05-26 10:25 ` Steffen Klassert [this message]
2026-05-26 11:51 ` Usama Arif
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ahV1BxasOuDHX7Zy@secunet.com \
--to=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=alexanderduyck@fb.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=enewton@meta.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=usama.arif@linux.dev \
--cc=vlad.wing@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox