From: Mahe Tardy <mahe.tardy@gmail.com>
To: bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, daniel@iogearbox.net,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, ast@kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, jordan@jrife.io, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, martin.lau@kernel.org,
eddyz87@gmail.com, clm@meta.com, ihor.solodrai@linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 2/7] net: move netfilter nf_reject6_fill_skb_dst to core ipv6
Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 00:02:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahYYWIitPa7zlnSK@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44848566ea55c9974065bd2aad211662a7b319452ecbc6e2f6cc942cb5b4e8d6@mail.kernel.org>
On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 04:20:14PM +0000, bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/net/ip6_route.h b/include/net/ip6_route.h
> > index 09ffe0f13ce7..eb5a60d3babe 100644
> > --- a/include/net/ip6_route.h
> > +++ b/include/net/ip6_route.h
> > @@ -100,6 +100,8 @@ static inline struct dst_entry *ip6_route_output(struct net *net,
> > return ip6_route_output_flags(net, sk, fl6, 0);
> > }
> >
> > +int ip6_route_reply_fill_dst(struct sk_buff *skb);
> > +
> > /* Only conditionally release dst if flags indicates
> > * !RT6_LOOKUP_F_DST_NOREF or dst is in uncached_list.
> > */
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
> > index b106e5fef9cb..e72065aa5f5a 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv6/route.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
> > @@ -2725,6 +2725,24 @@ struct dst_entry *ip6_route_output_flags(struct net *net,
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ip6_route_output_flags);
> >
> > +int ip6_route_reply_fill_dst(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > +{
> > + struct dst_entry *result;
> > + struct flowi6 fl = {
> > + .daddr = ipv6_hdr(skb)->saddr
> > + };
>
> Could ipv6_hdr(skb)->saddr read out-of-bounds memory if the IPv6 header
> spans paged fragments?
>
> Since this function is exported as EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for use by BPF kfuncs,
> it might be called on packets where the header isn't guaranteed to be in
> the linear data area. If there are no linearization checks like
> pskb_may_pull() before accessing ipv6_hdr(), this could read out-of-bounds
> memory or cause a page fault when processing undersized or fragmented
> packets supplied by BPF programs.
>
> The v6 cover letter mentions "call pskb_network_may_pull on the cloned
> pkt", but this linearization check is not present in this function.
>
> While the netfilter caller (nf_send_unreach6) may ensure the header is
> linearized, the exported function itself doesn't validate this condition.
>
> Reference: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1637d7e04ac3c65239ef77709175697bff287250913d1da68e8d4072e0ff34e1@mail.kernel.org/
This is the same remark as on IPv4 on which I already responded, I don't
think that's an actual issue.
>
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + result = ip6_route_output(dev_net(skb->dev), NULL, &fl);
>
> Can skb->dev be NULL in contexts where this function will be used?
>
> Since this function is exported as EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL for use by BPF
> kfuncs, it might be called from program types where the device reference
> is not retained, such as socket filters or tc ingress before device
> assignment. If skb->dev is NULL in these contexts, dev_net(skb->dev)
> would cause a NULL pointer dereference.
>
> While the netfilter caller (nf_send_unreach6) checks and sets skb->dev
> to loopback_dev if NULL, the exported function itself does not have this
> protection.
>
> Reference: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20260421111321.94393C2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org/
Dito.
>
> > + err = result->error;
> > + if (err)
> > + dst_release(result);
> > + else
> > + skb_dst_set(skb, result);
> > + return err;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ip6_route_reply_fill_dst);
> > +
> > struct dst_entry *ip6_blackhole_route(struct net *net, struct dst_entry *dst_orig)
> > {
> > struct rt6_info *rt, *ort = dst_rt6_info(dst_orig);
>
>
> ---
> AI reviewed your patch. Please fix the bug or email reply why it's not a bug.
> See: https://github.com/kernel-patches/vmtest/blob/master/ci/claude/README.md
>
> CI run summary: https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/26459248718
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-26 22:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-26 15:37 [PATCH bpf-next v7 0/7] bpf: add icmp_send kfunc Mahe Tardy
2026-05-26 15:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 1/7] net: move netfilter nf_reject_fill_skb_dst to core ipv4 Mahe Tardy
2026-05-26 16:20 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-26 15:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 2/7] net: move netfilter nf_reject6_fill_skb_dst to core ipv6 Mahe Tardy
2026-05-26 16:20 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-26 22:02 ` Mahe Tardy [this message]
2026-05-26 15:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 3/7] bpf: add bpf_icmp_send kfunc Mahe Tardy
2026-05-26 15:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 4/7] selftests/bpf: add bpf_icmp_send kfunc cgroup_skb tests Mahe Tardy
2026-05-26 16:20 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-26 22:05 ` Mahe Tardy
2026-05-26 15:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 5/7] selftests/bpf: add bpf_icmp_send kfunc cgroup_skb IPv6 tests Mahe Tardy
2026-05-26 15:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 6/7] selftests/bpf: add bpf_icmp_send kfunc tc tests Mahe Tardy
2026-05-26 15:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next v7 7/7] selftests/bpf: add bpf_icmp_send recursion test Mahe Tardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ahYYWIitPa7zlnSK@gmail.com \
--to=mahe.tardy@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bot+bpf-ci@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=clm@meta.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jordan@jrife.io \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox