From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from stravinsky.debian.org (stravinsky.debian.org [82.195.75.108]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E4B9405C3E; Wed, 27 May 2026 13:22:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=82.195.75.108 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779888140; cv=none; b=CAuFTbmo7f1fjsn2C9Oy3XZzXr/bJ4zPJ2kJrp/A9XC+lWPt15E96njUOMidl+tbErmeFuiBiqQdRPxenBoPvO5ny3M+ETLQ+WAs70TlKRX+tVlqu72YIC/kubcgTnXUiF6Kkl9FbgSfOFd7aoJbXoQ3d9/0z3ZJb/y19iauHwg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779888140; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZaNGpA5HYuZlzIwRGELlOp4CUVtlceg6mH6qVtqr4qs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=gr5bOe/Z2xqSQ2e5CLzRZ3DaeIPHpLUIF7wS8ZPpHtRaEgo9HOJWtwuZJWk1yhHy6YFOokBiqREeIOH78UNoefiRV1eOGSHUSn1hxDa6gI8d5Nl1RH3gW+Md8hZ6tpP39sF5p+Dw2Gx+L7YhW2O8OEv48sU8KeUo11oCZ3Vf4Iw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=debian.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=debian.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=debian.org header.i=@debian.org header.b=vcuUiUsz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=82.195.75.108 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=debian.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=debian.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=debian.org header.i=@debian.org header.b="vcuUiUsz" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; s=smtpauto.stravinsky; h=X-Debian-User:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=bOQQcEyuk3Y4GLb+wbT9HyIT+hbK6P/u32spWLnRrCc=; b=vcuUiUszXcNhITfV5q9m4xNxTY n1ft3+W1BoUls6I5vtLKU8U1vsdj7GV4131emFWdPzvmacvG0dC1BefIlZUuocnTDcaFiC5/vuqc5 jWLcJEWCGmAS4kZ9EpvK4yUjRW+LisG/vnR52WnB5YuWFVa1w3W8feqi/fPCPfUl5o8oQZ71cp4q2 yHfTc6w/+0wjhGVaOnk3R2b/MUIxYU5G+tp6MxJP0NgRgWMeUu/mSstRh9OEbR0cz9ZSnOxl5GNBC rX1h33yhOEw8zmP1/GTnEgYlp22jF8CYG3JHjjWVOcJfnDvMQVLXo1txQGtDd4lDmjz0IM6cAjQjO +rkkRcCg==; Received: from authenticated-user by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wSED1-003BmS-23; Wed, 27 May 2026 13:22:07 +0000 Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 06:22:02 -0700 From: Breno Leitao To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Andrew Lunn , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gustavold@gmail.com, asantostc@gmail.com, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] netconsole: stop charging every netpoll user for netconsole-only state Message-ID: References: <20260524-netconsole_move_more-v1-0-909d1ab398b4@debian.org> <20260526190053.619cc53d@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Debian-User: leitao Jakub and netdev maintainers, On Wed, May 27, 2026 at 10:07:16AM +0100, Breno Leitao wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 07:00:53PM +0000, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Sun, 24 May 2026 09:12:16 -0700 Breno Leitao wrote: > > > struct netpoll is shared by every netpoll consumer in the tree: > > > bonding, bridge, team, vlan, macvlan, dsa and netconsole. The non- > > > netconsole users only need a per-port handle that lets them transmit > > > SKBs. > > > > Are any of the Sashiko reports real? > > Yes, there are real pre-existent issues reported by Sashiko. > > > At least one seems legit (parallel device and target removal). > > If yes we should probably try to fix them before we shuffle the code > > around? > > Ack, I will get them fixed and them move them around. I was reading Linus' Linux 7.1-rc5 email[1], and I am wondering if these type of "fixes" should go to net or are you planning to change it to net-next. """ These things are "fixes", sure, but at the same time a lot of them are simply so irrelevant that I think they'd be better off in a linux-next tree and get merged during the merge window. """ --linus Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wjt1NiKOdyAMz_DT7NmZ++SizPOhRSi492ukdTnpDzHQw@mail.gmail.com/ [1] Thanks --breno