From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
To: Chuck Lever <cel@kernel.org>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v11 5/6] tls: Suppress spurious saved_data_ready on all receive paths
Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 11:15:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahgHoCb5H6SO4bLg@krikkit> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260526-tls-read-sock-v11-5-244fe1dc4abd@oracle.com>
2026-05-26, 10:21:35 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
>
> Each record release via tls_strp_msg_done() triggered
> tls_strp_check_rcv(), which called tls_rx_msg_ready() and
> fired saved_data_ready(). During a multi-record receive, the
> first N-1 wakeups are pure overhead: the caller is already
> running and will pick up subsequent records on the next loop
> iteration. The recvmsg and splice_read paths share this waste.
>
> Suppress per-record notifications and emit a single one on
> reader exit. tls_rx_rec_done() releases the current record
> and parses the next without announcing; tls_strp_check_rcv()
> gains a bool announce parameter so callers can request the
> quiet form. tls_rx_reader_release() fires the deferred
> announce on exit through tls_rx_msg_maybe_announce(), an
> idempotent helper that calls saved_data_ready() only when a
> record is parsed and has not yet been announced.
>
> To keep the final notification idempotent against records that
> the BH or the worker has already announced, tls_strparser gains
> a msg_announced bit. tls_rx_msg_maybe_announce() sets the bit
> when firing saved_data_ready(); the bit is cleared whenever
> the parsed record is wiped, by tls_strp_msg_consume() on
> consumption or by tls_strp_msg_load() when the lower socket
> loses bytes from under the parse. A second call for the same
> parsed record -- as when recvmsg() satisfies the request from
> ctx->rx_list without touching the strparser -- becomes a
> no-op.
>
> With no remaining callers, tls_strp_msg_done() is removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> ---
> include/net/tls.h | 5 +++++
> net/tls/tls.h | 5 ++---
> net/tls/tls_main.c | 2 +-
> net/tls/tls_strp.c | 23 ++++++++++++-----------
> net/tls/tls_sw.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 5 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>
--
Sabrina
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-28 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-26 14:21 [PATCH net-next v11 0/6] tls: receive-path fixes and clean-ups Chuck Lever
2026-05-26 14:21 ` [PATCH net-next v11 1/6] tls: Avoid evaluating freed skb in tls_sw_read_sock() loop Chuck Lever
2026-05-27 9:46 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-05-27 17:17 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-05-26 14:21 ` [PATCH net-next v11 2/6] tls: Re-present partially-consumed records in tls_sw_read_sock() Chuck Lever
2026-05-27 9:48 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-05-27 17:14 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-05-26 14:21 ` [PATCH net-next v11 3/6] tls: Move decrypt-failure abort into tls_rx_one_record() Chuck Lever
2026-05-26 14:21 ` [PATCH net-next v11 4/6] tls: Factor tls_strp_msg_consume() from tls_strp_msg_done() Chuck Lever
2026-05-27 17:31 ` Sabrina Dubroca
2026-05-26 14:21 ` [PATCH net-next v11 5/6] tls: Suppress spurious saved_data_ready on all receive paths Chuck Lever
2026-05-27 9:51 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-05-28 9:15 ` Sabrina Dubroca [this message]
2026-05-26 14:21 ` [PATCH net-next v11 6/6] tls: Flush backlog before waiting for a new record Chuck Lever
2026-05-28 9:14 ` Sabrina Dubroca
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ahgHoCb5H6SO4bLg@krikkit \
--to=sd@queasysnail.net \
--cc=cel@kernel.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-tls-handshake@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox