Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
To: Siho Lee <25esihoya@gmail.com>
Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net] netfilter: nft_payload: validate offset for all csum_type paths
Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 18:08:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahhodI4Ou64n9HEq@strlen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOYEF6nkrD4o_Kw_gxbv7Vefxpp=E6N4X_s-3KEcS1f3Hb1uAg@mail.gmail.com>

Siho Lee <25esihoya@gmail.com> wrote:
> For NFT_PAYLOAD_LL_HEADER, offset is computed as:
>     offset = skb_mac_header(skb) - skb->data - vlan_hlen
> which evaluates to -14 (or -18 with VLAN) after eth_type_trans()
> pulls the Ethernet header. This is a valid negative offset that
> refers to the Ethernet header area (used by bridge/vlan rules).
> 
> However, without any bounds check in the csum=NONE path:
> - skb_ensure_writable(skb, max(offset + priv->len, 0)):
>   max() converts negative values to 0, making it a no-op.

Are you sure?

> - skb_store_bits(skb, offset, src, priv->len):
>   A negative offset that exceeds skb headroom writes out of bounds.

Sure, but how can that happen?  This should be explained here,
because I am NOT seeing a bug in the first place.

> Add proper validation after the csum condition block:
> - Negative offsets: ensure they fall within skb_headroom(skb)
>   (bridge/vlan rules legitimately access the Ethernet header)
> - Positive offsets: ensure offset + len does not exceed skb->len

Large offset/len should make skb_copy_bits return an error.

> Also remove the max() wrapper from skb_ensure_writable() since
> the new validation guarantees the offset is within range.

No, this patch still breaks test cases we have.  Please figure out
if there is a bug in this code, and if there is, explain it in a way
that I can understand (e.g. provide broken example that triggers OOB).

Then, git clone https://git.netfilter.org/nftables and make sure the
tests pass.

> +	if (skb_ensure_writable(skb, offset + priv->len) ||

ensure_writable has unsigned arg, so this -14 + 6 will asks for
4GB and this aborts here.

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-28 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-28 15:28 [PATCH v2 net] netfilter: nft_payload: validate offset for all csum_type paths Siho Lee
2026-05-28 16:08 ` Florian Westphal [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-05-28 13:39 [PATCH net] netfilter: nft_payload: move offset bounds check outside csum condition Siho Lee
2026-05-28 14:12 ` Florian Westphal
2026-05-28 15:28   ` [PATCH v2 net] netfilter: nft_payload: validate offset for all csum_type paths Siho Lee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ahhodI4Ou64n9HEq@strlen.de \
    --to=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=25esihoya@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox