From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>, Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf] netfilter: flowtable: use pskb_may_pull() in nf_flow_ip6_tunnel_proto()
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2026 12:28:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aifquGhK_Cijxq7m@lore-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aidMPKrm9gOcPLW-@chamomile>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3241 bytes --]
On Jun 09, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> Hi Lorenzo,
>
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2026 at 07:06:52PM +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > Switch nf_flow_ip6_tunnel_proto() from skb_header_pointer() to
> > pskb_may_pull() for header validation, aligning it with the approach
> > used in nf_flow_ip4_tunnel_proto().
> > Move ctx->offset update inside the IPPROTO_IPV6 conditional block since
> > it should only be adjusted when a tunnel is actually detected.
> > While at it, use nexthdr instead of the hardcoded IPPROTO_IPV6 constant
> > when setting ctx->tun.proto.
> >
> > Fixes: d98103575dcdd ("netfilter: flowtable: Add IP6IP6 rx sw acceleration")
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_ip.c | 10 +++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_ip.c b/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_ip.c
> > index 9c05a50d6013..2946399ab715 100644
> > --- a/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_ip.c
> > +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_ip.c
> > @@ -347,15 +347,15 @@ static bool nf_flow_ip6_tunnel_proto(struct nf_flowtable_ctx *ctx,
> > struct sk_buff *skb)
> > {
> > #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> > - struct ipv6hdr *ip6h, _ip6h;
> > + struct ipv6hdr *ip6h;
> > __be16 frag_off;
> > u8 nexthdr;
> > int hdrlen;
> >
> > - ip6h = skb_header_pointer(skb, ctx->offset, sizeof(*ip6h), &_ip6h);
> > - if (!ip6h)
> > + if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, sizeof(*ip6h) + ctx->offset))
> > return false;
> >
> > + ip6h = (struct ipv6hdr *)(skb_network_header(skb) + ctx->offset);
> > if (ip6h->hop_limit <= 1)
> > return false;
>
> Not shown in the patch, but is there still a corner case here that
> needs to be covered?
>
> ipv6_skip_exthdr() uses skb_header_pointer() internal, then another
> pskb_may_pull() is needed to make sure no other IPv6 extension header
> sits between the outer and the inner IPPROTO_IPV6 header, allowing to
> be in a non-linear area of the skb?
>
> > @@ -367,9 +367,9 @@ static bool nf_flow_ip6_tunnel_proto(struct nf_flowtable_ctx *ctx,
> >
>
> I mean:
>
> if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, hdrlen))
> return false;
>
> where hdrlen is what ipv6_skip_exthdr() returns.
>
> Then, I think it should be safe to call skb_pull() on
> ctx->tun.hdr_size.
>
> Let me know, thanks.
I think you are right, here we need to run:
if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, hdrlen))
return false;
in order to be sure we can pull ctx->tun.hdr_size in nf_flow_ip_tunnel_pop().
Doing so, we can roll-back to the original skb_header_pointer() to access the
outer ip6 header here. What do you think?
Regards,
Lorenzo
>
> > if (nexthdr == IPPROTO_IPV6) {
> > ctx->tun.hdr_size = hdrlen;
> > - ctx->tun.proto = IPPROTO_IPV6;
> > + ctx->tun.proto = nexthdr;
> > + ctx->offset += ctx->tun.hdr_size;
> > }
> > - ctx->offset += ctx->tun.hdr_size;
> >
> > return true;
> > #else
> >
> > ---
> > base-commit: 9772589b57e44aedc240211c5c3f7a684a034d3a
> > change-id: 20260608-b4-nf_flow_ip6_tunnel_proto-update-8b64903825b4
> >
> > Best regards,
> > --
> > Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
> >
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-09 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-08 17:06 [PATCH nf] netfilter: flowtable: use pskb_may_pull() in nf_flow_ip6_tunnel_proto() Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-06-08 23:11 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-06-09 10:28 ` Lorenzo Bianconi [this message]
2026-06-09 11:48 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2026-06-09 12:31 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aifquGhK_Cijxq7m@lore-desk \
--to=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=phil@nwl.cc \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox