Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] vsock: fold sk_acceptq_added() into vsock_enqueue_accept()

[Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 02:13:16AM +0000, Raf Dickson wrote:
>virtio and hyperv call sk_acceptq_added() immediately before
>vsock_enqueue_accept(). Move the call into vsock_enqueue_accept()
>itself so callers cannot forget it and the accounting is consistent.
>
>vmci is left unchanged as sk_acceptq_added() there pairs with

I'm confused, vmci is also calling vsock_enqueue_accept(), are we 
calling sk_acceptq_added() twice?

Aaaah, vmci is calling vsock_enqueue_accept() after 
vsock_remove_pending(), so IIUC with the next patch we fix this, so 
should we reverse the order of the patches?

Also, should we avoid this?
Maybe adding a new function that moves a socket from the pending queue 
to the accept queue avoiding also sock_put/sock_hold dance and 
sk_acceptq_removed()/sk_acceptq_added().

I mean something like this (untested):

void vsock_pending_to_accept(struct sock *listener, struct sock *pending)
{
	struct vsock_sock *vpending = vsock_sk(pending);
	struct vsock_sock *vlistener = vsock_sk(listener);

	list_del_init(&vpending->pending_links);
	list_add_tail(&vpending->accept_queue, &vlistener->accept_queue);
}

To be called in vmci_transport_recv_connecting_server().

WDYT?

>vsock_add_pending(), not vsock_enqueue_accept(), since connections

So can we move sk_acceptq_added() also in vsock_add_pending()?
(with another patch I guess)

Thanks,
Stefano

>can be cleaned up by the pending work timer before ever reaching
>vsock_enqueue_accept().
>
>Suggested-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
>Suggested-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
>
>Signed-off-by: Raf Dickson <rafdog35@gmail.com>
>---
> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c                | 1 +
> net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c        | 1 -
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 1 -
> 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>index 2ce1063d4a..73e6416ee9 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
>@@ -507,6 +507,7 @@ void vsock_enqueue_accept(struct sock *listener, struct sock *connected)
> 	sock_hold(connected);
> 	sock_hold(listener);
> 	list_add_tail(&vconnected->accept_queue, &vlistener->accept_queue);
>+	sk_acceptq_added(listener);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vsock_enqueue_accept);
>
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c
>index b3394946b2..0de8148877 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c
>@@ -410,7 +410,6 @@ static void hvs_open_connection(struct vmbus_channel *chan)
>
> 	if (conn_from_host) {
> 		new->sk_state = TCP_ESTABLISHED;
>-		sk_acceptq_added(sk);
>
> 		hvs_new->vm_srv_id = *if_type;
> 		hvs_new->host_srv_id = *if_instance;
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>index b10666937c..4a39d48db9 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>@@ -1582,7 +1582,6 @@ virtio_transport_recv_listen(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
> 		return ret;
> 	}
>
>-	sk_acceptq_added(sk);
> 	if (virtio_transport_space_update(child, skb))
> 		child->sk_write_space(child);
>
>-- 
>2.54.0
>