Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: airoha: better handle MIBs for GDM ports with multiple devs attached
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 13:04:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aivnxEi-5XOl3s5s@lore-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260611-airoha-eth-multi-serdes-stats-v1-1-42442ae42064@kernel.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9195 bytes --]

> In the context of a GDM port that can have multiple net_devices attached
> (GDM3 and GDM4), the HW counters (MIBs) are global for the GDM port.
> This cause duplicated stats reported to the kernel for the related
> net_device.
> The SoC supports a split MIB feature where each counter is tracked based
> on the relevant HW channel (NBQ) to account for this scenario and
> provide a way to select the related counter on accessing the MIB
> registers.
> Enable this feature for GDM3 and GDM4 and configure the relevant HW
> channel before updating the HW stats to report correct HW counter to the
> kernel for the related interface.
> Move the stats struct from port to dev since HW counter are now specific
> to the network device instead of the GDM port. Refactor
> airoha_update_hw_stats() to take airoha_eth and airoha_gdm_port
> parameters since the function operates on the entire port.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>

commenting on sashiko's report:
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260611-airoha-eth-multi-serdes-stats-v1-1-42442ae42064%40kernel.org

[...]

>  
> -	/* reset mib counters */
> -	airoha_fe_set(eth, REG_FE_GDM_MIB_CLEAR(port->id),
> +static void airoha_update_hw_stats(struct airoha_gdm_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	struct airoha_gdm_port *port = dev->port;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&port->stats_lock);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(port->devs); i++) {
> +		if (port->devs[i])
> +			airoha_dev_get_hw_stats(port->devs[i]);
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Reset MIB counters */
> +	airoha_fe_set(dev->eth, REG_FE_GDM_MIB_CLEAR(port->id),
>  		      FE_GDM_MIB_RX_CLEAR_MASK | FE_GDM_MIB_TX_CLEAR_MASK);

-  Does clearing the MIB counters outside the device loop cause issues with the
   split MIB feature?
   airoha_dev_get_hw_stats() modifies REG_FE_GDM_MIB_CFG to select the specific
   nbq channel. Since REG_FE_GDM_MIB_CLEAR is called after the loop, does it only
   clear the hardware counters for the last selected nbq? If so, the uncleared
   counters for the other channels might accumulate in hardware, and adding them
   repeatedly to the software stats (e.g., dev->stats.tx_ok_pkts += val) could
   result in exponential growth.
   Alternatively, if REG_FE_GDM_MIB_CLEAR globally clears all nbq counters for
   the port, calling it here could drop packets that arrived for earlier devices
   between their respective read operations and this clear.
   - REG_FE_GDM_MIB_CLEAR is global and it clears all nbq counters for the port.
     There's a tiny window where packets arriving for dev[0] between its read
     and the global clear are lost, but that's microseconds of register reads,
     so I guess that's negligible.

Regards,
Lorenzo

>  
> -	u64_stats_update_end(&port->stats.syncp);
> -	spin_unlock(&port->stats.lock);
> +	spin_unlock(&port->stats_lock);
>  }
>  
>  static int airoha_dev_open(struct net_device *netdev)
> @@ -2043,23 +2071,22 @@ static void airoha_dev_get_stats64(struct net_device *netdev,
>  				   struct rtnl_link_stats64 *storage)
>  {
>  	struct airoha_gdm_dev *dev = netdev_priv(netdev);
> -	struct airoha_gdm_port *port = dev->port;
>  	unsigned int start;
>  
>  	airoha_update_hw_stats(dev);
>  	do {
> -		start = u64_stats_fetch_begin(&port->stats.syncp);
> -		storage->rx_packets = port->stats.rx_ok_pkts;
> -		storage->tx_packets = port->stats.tx_ok_pkts;
> -		storage->rx_bytes = port->stats.rx_ok_bytes;
> -		storage->tx_bytes = port->stats.tx_ok_bytes;
> -		storage->multicast = port->stats.rx_multicast;
> -		storage->rx_errors = port->stats.rx_errors;
> -		storage->rx_dropped = port->stats.rx_drops;
> -		storage->tx_dropped = port->stats.tx_drops;
> -		storage->rx_crc_errors = port->stats.rx_crc_error;
> -		storage->rx_over_errors = port->stats.rx_over_errors;
> -	} while (u64_stats_fetch_retry(&port->stats.syncp, start));
> +		start = u64_stats_fetch_begin(&dev->stats.syncp);
> +		storage->rx_packets = dev->stats.rx_ok_pkts;
> +		storage->tx_packets = dev->stats.tx_ok_pkts;
> +		storage->rx_bytes = dev->stats.rx_ok_bytes;
> +		storage->tx_bytes = dev->stats.tx_ok_bytes;
> +		storage->multicast = dev->stats.rx_multicast;
> +		storage->rx_errors = dev->stats.rx_errors;
> +		storage->rx_dropped = dev->stats.rx_drops;
> +		storage->tx_dropped = dev->stats.tx_drops;
> +		storage->rx_crc_errors = dev->stats.rx_crc_error;
> +		storage->rx_over_errors = dev->stats.rx_over_errors;
> +	} while (u64_stats_fetch_retry(&dev->stats.syncp, start));
>  }
>  
>  static int airoha_dev_change_mtu(struct net_device *netdev, int mtu)
> @@ -2310,20 +2337,19 @@ static void airoha_ethtool_get_mac_stats(struct net_device *netdev,
>  					 struct ethtool_eth_mac_stats *stats)
>  {
>  	struct airoha_gdm_dev *dev = netdev_priv(netdev);
> -	struct airoha_gdm_port *port = dev->port;
>  	unsigned int start;
>  
>  	airoha_update_hw_stats(dev);
>  	do {
> -		start = u64_stats_fetch_begin(&port->stats.syncp);
> -		stats->FramesTransmittedOK = port->stats.tx_ok_pkts;
> -		stats->OctetsTransmittedOK = port->stats.tx_ok_bytes;
> -		stats->MulticastFramesXmittedOK = port->stats.tx_multicast;
> -		stats->BroadcastFramesXmittedOK = port->stats.tx_broadcast;
> -		stats->FramesReceivedOK = port->stats.rx_ok_pkts;
> -		stats->OctetsReceivedOK = port->stats.rx_ok_bytes;
> -		stats->BroadcastFramesReceivedOK = port->stats.rx_broadcast;
> -	} while (u64_stats_fetch_retry(&port->stats.syncp, start));
> +		start = u64_stats_fetch_begin(&dev->stats.syncp);
> +		stats->FramesTransmittedOK = dev->stats.tx_ok_pkts;
> +		stats->OctetsTransmittedOK = dev->stats.tx_ok_bytes;
> +		stats->MulticastFramesXmittedOK = dev->stats.tx_multicast;
> +		stats->BroadcastFramesXmittedOK = dev->stats.tx_broadcast;
> +		stats->FramesReceivedOK = dev->stats.rx_ok_pkts;
> +		stats->OctetsReceivedOK = dev->stats.rx_ok_bytes;
> +		stats->BroadcastFramesReceivedOK = dev->stats.rx_broadcast;
> +	} while (u64_stats_fetch_retry(&dev->stats.syncp, start));
>  }
>  
>  static const struct ethtool_rmon_hist_range airoha_ethtool_rmon_ranges[] = {
> @@ -2343,8 +2369,7 @@ airoha_ethtool_get_rmon_stats(struct net_device *netdev,
>  			      const struct ethtool_rmon_hist_range **ranges)
>  {
>  	struct airoha_gdm_dev *dev = netdev_priv(netdev);
> -	struct airoha_gdm_port *port = dev->port;
> -	struct airoha_hw_stats *hw_stats = &port->stats;
> +	struct airoha_hw_stats *hw_stats = &dev->stats;
>  	unsigned int start;
>  
>  	BUILD_BUG_ON(ARRAY_SIZE(airoha_ethtool_rmon_ranges) !=
> @@ -2357,7 +2382,7 @@ airoha_ethtool_get_rmon_stats(struct net_device *netdev,
>  	do {
>  		int i;
>  
> -		start = u64_stats_fetch_begin(&port->stats.syncp);
> +		start = u64_stats_fetch_begin(&dev->stats.syncp);
>  		stats->fragments = hw_stats->rx_fragment;
>  		stats->jabbers = hw_stats->rx_jabber;
>  		for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(airoha_ethtool_rmon_ranges) - 1;
> @@ -2365,7 +2390,7 @@ airoha_ethtool_get_rmon_stats(struct net_device *netdev,
>  			stats->hist[i] = hw_stats->rx_len[i];
>  			stats->hist_tx[i] = hw_stats->tx_len[i];
>  		}
> -	} while (u64_stats_fetch_retry(&port->stats.syncp, start));
> +	} while (u64_stats_fetch_retry(&dev->stats.syncp, start));
>  }
>  
>  static int airoha_qdma_set_chan_tx_sched(struct net_device *netdev,
> @@ -3205,6 +3230,7 @@ static int airoha_alloc_gdm_device(struct airoha_eth *eth,
>  
>  	netdev->dev.of_node = of_node_get(np);
>  	dev = netdev_priv(netdev);
> +	u64_stats_init(&dev->stats.syncp);
>  	dev->port = port;
>  	dev->eth = eth;
>  	dev->nbq = nbq;
> @@ -3244,9 +3270,8 @@ static int airoha_alloc_gdm_port(struct airoha_eth *eth,
>  	if (!port)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	u64_stats_init(&port->stats.syncp);
> -	spin_lock_init(&port->stats.lock);
>  	port->id = id;
> +	spin_lock_init(&port->stats_lock);
>  	eth->ports[p] = port;
>  
>  	err = airoha_metadata_dst_alloc(port);
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.h
> index 8f42973f9cf5..46b1c31939de 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.h
> @@ -215,8 +215,6 @@ struct airoha_tx_irq_queue {
>  };
>  
>  struct airoha_hw_stats {
> -	/* protect concurrent hw_stats accesses */
> -	spinlock_t lock;
>  	struct u64_stats_sync syncp;
>  
>  	/* get_stats64 */
> @@ -554,6 +552,8 @@ struct airoha_gdm_dev {
>  
>  	u32 flags;
>  	int nbq;
> +
> +	struct airoha_hw_stats stats;
>  };
>  
>  struct airoha_gdm_port {
> @@ -561,7 +561,8 @@ struct airoha_gdm_port {
>  	int id;
>  	int users;
>  
> -	struct airoha_hw_stats stats;
> +	/* protect concurrent hw_stats accesses */
> +	spinlock_t stats_lock;
>  
>  	struct metadata_dst *dsa_meta[AIROHA_MAX_DSA_PORTS];
>  };
> 
> ---
> base-commit: c8459ee2fef502d6ef6c063751c33d9ac7943eab
> change-id: 20260611-airoha-eth-multi-serdes-stats-df2dc16c2dd6
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2026-06-12 11:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-11 10:43 [PATCH net-next] net: airoha: better handle MIBs for GDM ports with multiple devs attached Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-06-12 11:04 ` Lorenzo Bianconi [this message]
2026-06-12 14:20 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-06-12 17:08 ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aivnxEi-5XOl3s5s@lore-desk \
    --to=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox