From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 847E6386C20; Wed, 17 Jun 2026 21:52:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781733147; cv=none; b=NjSu2x05oajh9iQTFRK6Ldnl/y02CTOpGIJGlNrkDDwArXB5sFpMgBGe/RtrvON7Eo2Ui1J9gV9ocMcm0ri2bhXrD1LQciaA83zQCuCSwXLzRdxzroAQAm0v/p/NCn6mKFrQ0RNTFPNRmmPmjP+3PIt+SrzVUTfaASImBanl+Ss= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781733147; c=relaxed/simple; bh=u91/Gr8QP7fH6w2fiW94UDBR0FPYyTtWXCVs9PXPN8Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Mv7jn9hTyBHFFcpIqE8n2vjvHZubPryr70N7RZq/qdxglqnxWMlEX1JDnzbk4IHWCtHYxaWlVlGZkLyf4L7PyACXJ5pcBJOhoarta99F5y+3KYySKfgo0rOu5U+B0iHpw8f87r53Qtb20f/UQrP8TrvPAKBzRYM9Mcqz80iSvvE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=U28s7e3v; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="U28s7e3v" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C74761F000E9; Wed, 17 Jun 2026 21:52:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1781733146; bh=XBhULN87TTfxM8KHC3ilMiQOCnX7++hxcpXK3eSVbiQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=U28s7e3vr1Tib0RGPLU81tBoz9VlTgzJ9XndxETY9vLceedtJcdC2w5VUKDoTyQNn +7riiQx+CuAQdhGewnNZ6pJssnCoG5cP7tVs67S8DQCxESYN6O7654PNP4bw2DTWIb zf7jQ9s4BA5N6om67Gin/438ltTFd85CHX2KmfLY4c1vcCljN5Fm9lNVkdXLQpz2US j/rJdnO3pZbaXiBru65m77NXt4YFnMgW9LjPJafRMUAvm9xsi8+tMc/vsOoVl/GFDE 5IsxmrTve1qXnFba9PYAQPqOFciuIPZ9oyMgnm9mKi8bvIVAFhs/dwRo6cXGDwoOAD rVk8+4QMBVTbQ== Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 17:52:24 -0400 From: Sasha Levin To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, David Howells , Michael Bommarito , Marc Dionne , Jeffrey Altman , Eric Dumazet , "David S. Miller" , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.6.y] rxrpc: Fix the ACK parser to extract the SACK table for parsing Message-ID: References: <2026061543-superior-passerby-d597@gregkh> <20260617180410.271223-1-sashal@kernel.org> <20260617132704.0e1fe56b@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260617132704.0e1fe56b@kernel.org> On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 01:27:04PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >On Wed, 17 Jun 2026 14:04:10 -0400 Sasha Levin wrote: >> Subject: [PATCH 6.6.y] rxrpc: Fix the ACK parser to extract the SACK table for parsing >> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 14:04:10 -0400 >> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.53.0 >> >> From: David Howells >> >> [ Upstream commit 333b6d5bb9f87827ac2639c737bf9613dbae7253 ] > >nit: you missed the "skip patchwork" header on this? Hey Jakub, This one is a backport crafted in response to a failed backport of a stable tagged commit. I followed Greg's template to sending those backports to him, but I also think that I do want folks to review the actual backport itself. Do you think it makes sense to add a skip patchwork header on these too? -- Thanks, Sasha