From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from stravinsky.debian.org (stravinsky.debian.org [82.195.75.108]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54A3E3DB319; Thu, 18 Jun 2026 09:32:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=82.195.75.108 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781775159; cv=none; b=bRCe9ui1MtRJHWOWXAnFOWWkn5vvLceQPKJ+cj4b5G8HWIjeR+xhBc7xLCOoB7wMbZ5vFr0sFltG7PLZf/D1PR4jlAB79LZom+pTyA4yaM/VEF6iza/ubOlh7bKD2tUGdGrRmfnIRnlUAsGWXFzpU/tLV3Str3eP/8QAe8tCnys= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1781775159; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uSQDO0PCAJO4gKVbp7oxH3aAC+XDz+Rc8Xd3YIhsr90=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=MO0S+Qfq1GsgSjO+5FIklLNoCwuOs5Utb4wHZebZE3tptn+d/u5qkSJvUUlFOEbT29Bcvxz0RvwpyciMbT+Kr7D6G4mhXfF20nLyytQmhPSY/lTKh/wZ5BqkN5M6Ffn+fKuJm2uXkj9SNGaurs0zEhtfSU4XZY/J6cj/bEyeoOU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=debian.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=debian.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=debian.org header.i=@debian.org header.b=bEdtXF0/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=82.195.75.108 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=debian.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=debian.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=debian.org header.i=@debian.org header.b="bEdtXF0/" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=debian.org; s=smtpauto.stravinsky; h=X-Debian-User:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=KFgNOFHRT7gMIXe4BXoejHARqTbv7CawbNuZytFwkcg=; b=bEdtXF0/WJsoimzLg61UOJcGk/ 6ADpiiCywWyzucbuS591wn72+B6HsxValvjoPyrq79V43aQWgasmuqoGwesllX7KMSSnYeeJhOrAA XveL/jFDIvqc9OisWQ6A+43RltQpQBCDMbN15pNFkUJxKzodsipyi8UkRP3dgbt53vpSdg+qbISvD ttzjBNCKl9Ij8xKnfGQyAVlgqQ3v9wv2d+V4AgcEZu4d/AQE5+5qxu4gQDXign62Anm8sJ3j8VpNs TDd6S7e8r1azIZhnBgfSKJyC20ZgTmhAfAsm05j2P/PvtiQhYda9yDKF8GPIYURWEz+db1Cj/QQhW /O2W0u4g==; Received: from authenticated-user by stravinsky.debian.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1wa96n-00FIJI-1v; Thu, 18 Jun 2026 09:32:25 +0000 Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2026 02:32:20 -0700 From: Breno Leitao To: Satish Kharat Cc: Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sesidhar Baddela Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 01/10] enic: verify firmware supports V2 SR-IOV at probe time Message-ID: References: <20260617-enic-sriov-v2-admin-channel-v2-v9-0-37f5f5af4c93@cisco.com> <20260617-enic-sriov-v2-admin-channel-v2-v9-1-37f5f5af4c93@cisco.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260617-enic-sriov-v2-admin-channel-v2-v9-1-37f5f5af4c93@cisco.com> X-Debian-User: leitao On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 06:53:24PM -0700, Satish Kharat wrote: > During PF probe, query the firmware get-supported-feature interface > to verify that the running firmware supports V2 SR-IOV. Firmware > version 5.3(4.72) and later report VIC_FEATURE_SRIOV via > CMD_GET_SUPP_FEATURE_VER. If the firmware does not support the > feature, set vf_type to ENIC_VF_TYPE_NONE and log a warning so the > admin knows a firmware upgrade is needed. > > VIC_FEATURE_SRIOV is assigned the explicit value 4 to match the > firmware ABI. Slot 3 (firmware's VIC_FEATURE_PTP) is reserved with > a comment rather than a placeholder enum entry, since PTP is not > used by the upstream driver. > > Suggested-by: Breno Leitao > Signed-off-by: Satish Kharat Reviewed-by: Breno Leitao FWIW: net-next is closed now. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260615085310.014e4e31@kernel.org/