From: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
To: Zhenzhong Wu <jt26wzz@gmail.com>, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, kpsingh@kernel.org, haoluo@google.com,
jolsa@kernel.org, menglong8.dong@gmail.com, eddyz87@gmail.com,
mykolal@fb.com, tamird@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable 6.6.y v4 0/4] bpf: linked scalar precision fixes
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2026 16:00:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajo7j-XkfwzB-mUA@u94a> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260621172735.409355-1-jt26wzz@gmail.com>
On Mon, Jun 22, 2026 at 01:27:31AM +0800, Zhenzhong Wu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This v4 targets 6.6.y and keeps the v3 backport strategy: use the full
> upstream linked-scalar precision-tracking series, instead of the earlier
> d028f87517d6/9e314f5d8682 not-equal refinement backport path.
[...]
> Relevant selftest results on 6.6.y with this v4 backport:
>
> test_verifier:
> 788 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
>
> test_progs -t verifier_scalar_ids:
> all 18 verifier_scalar_ids subtests passed
LGTM, thanks!
I can confirm that all flavors of test_progs in BPF selftests are still
passing on x86_64[1] with this patchset applied on top of stable 6.6.
Not sure if stable gather these tags/trailers, but fwiw
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
Tested-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
1: https://github.com/kernel-patches/linux-stable/actions/runs/28008870143/job/82897081824
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-23 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-21 17:27 [PATCH stable 6.6.y v4 0/4] bpf: linked scalar precision fixes Zhenzhong Wu
2026-06-21 17:27 ` [PATCH stable 6.6.y v4 1/4] bpf: Track equal scalars history on per-instruction level Zhenzhong Wu
2026-06-21 17:27 ` [PATCH stable 6.6.y v4 2/4] bpf: Remove mark_precise_scalar_ids() Zhenzhong Wu
2026-06-21 17:27 ` [PATCH stable 6.6.y v4 3/4] selftests/bpf: Tests for per-insn sync_linked_regs() precision tracking Zhenzhong Wu
2026-06-21 17:27 ` [PATCH stable 6.6.y v4 4/4] selftests/bpf: Update comments find_equal_scalars->sync_linked_regs Zhenzhong Wu
2026-06-23 8:00 ` Shung-Hsi Yu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ajo7j-XkfwzB-mUA@u94a \
--to=shung-hsi.yu@suse.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=jt26wzz@gmail.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
--cc=mykolal@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tamird@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox