From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>, Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next v4 5/6] net: netfilter: Add SIT tunnel flowtable acceleration
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2026 12:33:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ak4nltE006uDesMl@lore-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260703-b4-flowtable-sw-accel-ip6ip-v4-5-00398cd12382@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 20415 bytes --]
commenting on sashiko's report:
https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20260703-b4-flowtable-sw-accel-ip6ip-v4-0-00398cd12382%40kernel.org
> Introduce sw flowtable acceleration for the TX/RX paths of
> SIT tunnels, relying on the netfilter flowtable infrastructure.
> The feature can be tested with a forwarding scenario between two
> NICs (eth0 and eth1), where a SIT tunnel is used to reach a remote
> site via eth1 as the underlay device:
>
> ETH0 -- TUN0 <==> ETH1 -- [IP network] -- TUN1 (192.168.2.2)
>
> [IP configuration]
>
> 6: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000
> link/ether 00:00:22:33:11:55 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> inet6 2001:db8:1::2/64 scope global nodad
> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> 7: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UP group default qlen 1000
> link/ether 00:11:22:33:11:55 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> inet 192.168.2.1/24 scope global eth1
> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
> 8: tun0@NONE: <POINTOPOINT,NOARP,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1480 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
> link/sit 192.168.2.1 peer 192.168.2.2
> inet6 2001:db8:200::1/64 scope global nodad
> valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
>
> $ ip route show
> 192.168.2.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.2.1
>
> $ ip -6 route show
> 2001:db8:1::/64 dev eth0 proto kernel metric 256 pref medium
> 2001:db8:200::/64 dev tun0 proto kernel metric 256 pref medium
> default via 2001:db8:200::2 dev tun0 metric 1024 pref medium
>
> $ nft list ruleset
> table inet filter {
> flowtable ft {
> hook ingress priority filter
> devices = { eth0, eth1 }
> }
>
> chain forward {
> type filter hook forward priority filter; policy accept;
> meta l4proto { tcp, udp } flow add @ft
> }
> }
>
> When reproducing this scenario using veth interfaces, the following
> results were observed:
>
> - TCP stream received from SIT tunnel:
> - net-next (baseline): ~118 Gbps
> - net-next + SIT flowtable support: ~148 Gbps
>
> - TCP stream transmitted to SIT tunnel:
> - net-next (baseline): ~131 Gbps
> - net-next + SIT flowtable support: ~147 Gbps
>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
> ---
> net/ipv6/sit.c | 26 ++++
> net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_ip.c | 290 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 2 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 134 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/sit.c b/net/ipv6/sit.c
> index a38b24fb8384..0ac6f7839878 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/sit.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/sit.c
> @@ -1365,6 +1365,31 @@ ipip6_tunnel_ctl(struct net_device *dev, struct ip_tunnel_parm_kern *p,
> }
> }
>
> +static int ipip6_tunnel_fill_forward_path(struct net_device_path_ctx *ctx,
> + struct net_device_path *path)
> +{
> + struct ip_tunnel *tunnel = netdev_priv(ctx->dev);
> + const struct iphdr *tiph = &tunnel->parms.iph;
> + struct rtable *rt;
> +
> + rt = ip_route_output(dev_net(ctx->dev), tiph->daddr, 0, 0, 0,
> + RT_SCOPE_UNIVERSE);
> + if (IS_ERR(rt))
> + return PTR_ERR(rt);
> +
> + path->type = DEV_PATH_TUN;
> + path->tun.src_v4.s_addr = tiph->saddr;
> + path->tun.dst_v4.s_addr = tiph->daddr;
> + path->tun.l3_proto = IPPROTO_IPV6;
> + path->tun.encap_proto = AF_INET;
> + path->dev = ctx->dev;
> +
> + ctx->dev = rt->dst.dev;
> + ip_rt_put(rt);
> +
> + return 0;
- Is tiph->daddr always meaningful here? SIT supports several modes where
tunnel->parms.iph.daddr is either zero or a placeholder and the real
outer IPv4 endpoint is derived per-packet from the inner IPv6
destination:
- ISATAP (dev->priv_flags & IFF_ISATAP), resolved by
ipip6_tunnel_dst_find(..., true)
- 6rd / 6to4, resolved per-packet via try_6rd() / check_6rd()
- NBMA / point-to-multipoint (tiph->daddr == 0), resolved by
ipip6_tunnel_dst_find(..., false)
In these cases ip_route_output(daddr=0) will fall through to the default
route, ctx->dev gets resolved to the wrong underlay, and every
accelerated packet is encapsulated toward 0.0.0.0 (or a fixed unicast
that does not match the flow) regardless of the actual inner
destination.
Compare ip6_tnl_fill_forward_path() which returns -EOPNOTSUPP when it
detects unsupported tunnel features; would something equivalent make
sense here, at least for !tiph->daddr, IFF_ISATAP, and 6rd configured
tunnels?
Does this path also need to consider tunnel->encap? SIT supports FOU
and GUE via ip_tunnel_encap(skb, &tunnel->encap, &protocol, &fl4) in the
slow path, and there is no rejection here when tunnel->encap.type is
not TUNNEL_ENCAP_NONE. Once a SIT tunnel that was configured with
encap fou/gue is attached to a flowtable, the fast path pushes a plain
IPv4 outer header via nf_flow_tunnel_ipip_push() and skips the FOU/GUE
encapsulation entirely. ip6_tnl_fill_forward_path() has an
-EOPNOTSUPP guard for its own analogous case (encaplimit); would a
similar guard work here?
The slow path in ipip6_tunnel_xmit() uses flowi4_init_output() with
tunnel->parms.link (oif), tunnel->fwmark, tos & INET_DSCP_MASK, and
tiph->saddr:
flowi4_init_output(&fl4, tunnel->parms.link, tunnel->fwmark,
tos & INET_DSCP_MASK, RT_SCOPE_UNIVERSE,
IPPROTO_IPV6, 0, dst, tiph->saddr, ...);
The call above passes 0 for saddr, dscp and oif and does not pass a
fwmark. For a SIT tunnel bound to a specific link, using fwmark-based
policy routing, or configured with a source address, can the fast-path
route lookup diverge from what the slow path would pick, so that
rt->dst.dev (which becomes ctx->dev and drives the flowtable egress)
ends up on a different underlay device than slow-path packets on the
same tunnel?
- I will fix it in v5.
- Is it safe to hardcode IPPROTO_IPV6 here? sit_tunnel_xmit() dispatches
on skb->protocol and legitimately supports ETH_P_IP (IPv4-in-IPv4 via
IPPROTO_IPIP) and, if CONFIG_MPLS is set, ETH_P_MPLS_UC (IPPROTO_MPLS);
ipip6_valid_ip_proto() also accepts both on the receive side.
If flowtable acceleration engages for a flow whose inner payload is
IPv4 or MPLS through a SIT device, the outer iph->protocol that
nf_flow_tunnel_ipip_push() synthesises from tuple->tun.l3_proto will be
IPPROTO_IPV6, and the receiver will drop or misparse the packet.
ip6_tnl_fill_forward_path() selects l3_proto from ctx->ether_type
(ETH_P_IP => IPPROTO_IPIP, else IPPROTO_IPV6) — would something similar
be appropriate here?
- I will fix it in v5.
Regards,
Lorenzo
> +}
> +
> static int
> ipip6_tunnel_siocdevprivate(struct net_device *dev, struct ifreq *ifr,
> void __user *data, int cmd)
> @@ -1401,6 +1426,7 @@ static const struct net_device_ops ipip6_netdev_ops = {
> .ndo_siocdevprivate = ipip6_tunnel_siocdevprivate,
> .ndo_get_iflink = ip_tunnel_get_iflink,
> .ndo_tunnel_ctl = ipip6_tunnel_ctl,
> + .ndo_fill_forward_path = ipip6_tunnel_fill_forward_path,
> };
>
> static void ipip6_dev_free(struct net_device *dev)
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_ip.c b/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_ip.c
> index 4b6de16bd4f3..f02e71ae5448 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_ip.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_ip.c
> @@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ static bool nf_flow_ip4_tunnel_proto(struct nf_flowtable_ctx *ctx,
> if (iph->ttl <= 1)
> return false;
>
> - if (iph->protocol == IPPROTO_IPIP) {
> + if (iph->protocol == IPPROTO_IPIP || iph->protocol == IPPROTO_IPV6) {
> ctx->tun.proto = iph->protocol;
> ctx->tun.hdr_size = size;
> ctx->offset += ctx->tun.hdr_size;
> @@ -464,21 +464,6 @@ static void nf_flow_encap_pop(struct nf_flowtable_ctx *ctx,
> nf_flow_ip_tunnel_pop(ctx, skb);
> }
>
> -static struct flow_offload_tuple_rhash *
> -nf_flow_offload_lookup(struct nf_flowtable_ctx *ctx,
> - struct nf_flowtable *flow_table, struct sk_buff *skb)
> -{
> - struct flow_offload_tuple tuple = {};
> -
> - if (!nf_flow_skb_encap_protocol(ctx, skb, htons(ETH_P_IP)))
> - return NULL;
> -
> - if (nf_flow_tuple_ip(ctx, skb, &tuple) < 0)
> - return NULL;
> -
> - return flow_offload_lookup(flow_table, &tuple);
> -}
> -
> static int nf_flow_offload_forward(struct nf_flowtable_ctx *ctx,
> struct nf_flowtable *flow_table,
> struct flow_offload_tuple_rhash *tuplehash,
> @@ -606,19 +591,33 @@ static int nf_flow_tunnel_ipip_push(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct flow_offload_tuple *tuple,
> __be32 *ip_daddr)
> {
> - struct iphdr *iph = (struct iphdr *)skb_network_header(skb);
> struct rtable *rt = dst_rtable(tuple->dst_cache);
> - u8 tos = iph->tos, ttl = iph->ttl;
> - __be16 frag_off = iph->frag_off;
> - u32 headroom = sizeof(*iph);
> + __be16 frag_off = 0;
> + struct iphdr *iph;
> + u8 tos = 0, ttl;
> + u32 headroom;
> int err;
>
> + if (tuple->tun.l3_proto == IPPROTO_IPV6) {
> + struct ipv6hdr *ip6h;
> +
> + ip6h = (struct ipv6hdr *)skb_network_header(skb);
> + tos = ipv6_get_dsfield(ip6h);
> + ttl = ip6h->hop_limit;
> + } else {
> + iph = (struct iphdr *)skb_network_header(skb);
> + frag_off = iph->frag_off;
> + tos = iph->tos;
> + ttl = iph->ttl;
> + }
> +
> err = iptunnel_handle_offloads(skb, SKB_GSO_IPXIP4);
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> - skb_set_inner_ipproto(skb, IPPROTO_IPIP);
> - headroom += LL_RESERVED_SPACE(rt->dst.dev) + rt->dst.header_len;
> + skb_set_inner_ipproto(skb, tuple->tun.l3_proto);
> + headroom = sizeof(*iph) + LL_RESERVED_SPACE(rt->dst.dev) +
> + rt->dst.header_len;
> err = skb_cow_head(skb, headroom);
> if (err)
> return err;
> @@ -629,6 +628,7 @@ static int nf_flow_tunnel_ipip_push(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
> /* Push down and install the IP header. */
> skb_push(skb, sizeof(*iph));
> skb_reset_network_header(skb);
> + skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_IP);
>
> iph = ip_hdr(skb);
> iph->version = 4;
> @@ -723,16 +723,6 @@ static int nf_flow_tunnel_push(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
> }
> }
>
> -static int nf_flow_tunnel_v6_push(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
> - struct flow_offload_tuple *tuple,
> - struct in6_addr **ip6_daddr)
> -{
> - if (tuple->tun_num)
> - return nf_flow_tunnel_ip6ip6_push(net, skb, tuple, ip6_daddr);
> -
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> static int nf_flow_encap_push(struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct flow_offload_tuple *tuple,
> struct net_device *outdev)
> @@ -830,103 +820,6 @@ static unsigned int nf_flow_queue_xmit(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
> return NF_STOLEN;
> }
>
> -unsigned int
> -nf_flow_offload_ip_hook(void *priv, struct sk_buff *skb,
> - const struct nf_hook_state *state)
> -{
> - struct flow_offload_tuple_rhash *tuplehash;
> - struct nf_flowtable *flow_table = priv;
> - struct flow_offload_tuple *other_tuple;
> - enum flow_offload_tuple_dir dir;
> - struct nf_flowtable_ctx ctx = {
> - .in = state->in,
> - };
> - struct nf_flow_xmit xmit = {};
> - struct in6_addr *ip6_daddr;
> - struct flow_offload *flow;
> - struct neighbour *neigh;
> - struct rtable *rt;
> - __be32 ip_daddr;
> - int ret;
> -
> - tuplehash = nf_flow_offload_lookup(&ctx, flow_table, skb);
> - if (!tuplehash)
> - return NF_ACCEPT;
> -
> - ret = nf_flow_offload_forward(&ctx, flow_table, tuplehash, skb);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return NF_DROP;
> - else if (ret == 0)
> - return NF_ACCEPT;
> -
> - if (unlikely(tuplehash->tuple.xmit_type == FLOW_OFFLOAD_XMIT_XFRM)) {
> - rt = dst_rtable(tuplehash->tuple.dst_cache);
> - memset(skb->cb, 0, sizeof(struct inet_skb_parm));
> - IPCB(skb)->iif = skb->dev->ifindex;
> - IPCB(skb)->flags = IPSKB_FORWARDED;
> - return nf_flow_xmit_xfrm(skb, state, &rt->dst);
> - }
> -
> - dir = tuplehash->tuple.dir;
> - flow = container_of(tuplehash, struct flow_offload, tuplehash[dir]);
> - other_tuple = &flow->tuplehash[!dir].tuple;
> - ip_daddr = other_tuple->src_v4.s_addr;
> -
> - if (nf_flow_tunnel_push(state->net, skb, other_tuple, &ip_daddr,
> - &ip6_daddr) < 0)
> - return NF_DROP;
> -
> - switch (tuplehash->tuple.xmit_type) {
> - case FLOW_OFFLOAD_XMIT_NEIGH: {
> - struct dst_entry *dst;
> -
> - xmit.outdev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(state->net, tuplehash->tuple.ifidx);
> - if (!xmit.outdev) {
> - flow_offload_teardown(flow);
> - return NF_DROP;
> - }
> - if (other_tuple->tun.encap_proto == AF_INET6 ||
> - ctx.tun.proto == IPPROTO_IPV6) {
> - struct rt6_info *rt6;
> -
> - rt6 = dst_rt6_info(tuplehash->tuple.dst_cache);
> - neigh = ip_neigh_gw6(rt6->dst.dev,
> - rt6_nexthop(rt6, ip6_daddr));
> - dst = &rt6->dst;
> - } else {
> - rt = dst_rtable(tuplehash->tuple.dst_cache);
> - neigh = ip_neigh_gw4(rt->dst.dev,
> - rt_nexthop(rt, ip_daddr));
> - dst = &rt->dst;
> - }
> - if (IS_ERR(neigh)) {
> - flow_offload_teardown(flow);
> - return NF_DROP;
> - }
> - xmit.dest = neigh->ha;
> - skb_dst_set_noref(skb, dst);
> - break;
> - }
> - case FLOW_OFFLOAD_XMIT_DIRECT:
> - xmit.outdev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(state->net, tuplehash->tuple.out.ifidx);
> - if (!xmit.outdev) {
> - flow_offload_teardown(flow);
> - return NF_DROP;
> - }
> - xmit.dest = tuplehash->tuple.out.h_dest;
> - xmit.source = tuplehash->tuple.out.h_source;
> - break;
> - default:
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> - return NF_DROP;
> - }
> - xmit.tuple = other_tuple;
> - xmit.needs_gso_segment = tuplehash->tuple.needs_gso_segment;
> -
> - return nf_flow_queue_xmit(state->net, skb, &xmit);
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_flow_offload_ip_hook);
> -
> static void nf_flow_nat_ipv6_tcp(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int thoff,
> struct in6_addr *addr,
> struct in6_addr *new_addr,
> @@ -1111,8 +1004,16 @@ static int nf_flow_offload_ipv6_forward(struct nf_flowtable_ctx *ctx,
> flow = container_of(tuplehash, struct flow_offload, tuplehash[dir]);
>
> mtu = flow->tuplehash[dir].tuple.mtu + ctx->offset;
> - if (flow->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.tun_num)
> + switch (flow->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.tun.encap_proto) {
> + case AF_INET:
> + mtu -= sizeof(struct iphdr);
> + break;
> + case AF_INET6:
> mtu -= sizeof(*ip6h);
> + break;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
>
> if (unlikely(nf_flow_exceeds_mtu(skb, mtu)))
> return 0;
> @@ -1146,6 +1047,25 @@ static int nf_flow_offload_ipv6_forward(struct nf_flowtable_ctx *ctx,
> return 1;
> }
>
> +static struct flow_offload_tuple_rhash *
> +nf_flow_offload_lookup(struct nf_flowtable_ctx *ctx,
> + struct nf_flowtable *flow_table, struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + struct flow_offload_tuple tuple = {};
> +
> + if (!nf_flow_skb_encap_protocol(ctx, skb, htons(ETH_P_IP)))
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (ctx->tun.proto == IPPROTO_IPV6) {
> + if (nf_flow_tuple_ipv6(ctx, skb, &tuple) < 0)
> + return NULL;
> + } else if (nf_flow_tuple_ip(ctx, skb, &tuple) < 0) {
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + return flow_offload_lookup(flow_table, &tuple);
> +}
> +
> static struct flow_offload_tuple_rhash *
> nf_flow_offload_ipv6_lookup(struct nf_flowtable_ctx *ctx,
> struct nf_flowtable *flow_table,
> @@ -1166,6 +1086,108 @@ nf_flow_offload_ipv6_lookup(struct nf_flowtable_ctx *ctx,
> return flow_offload_lookup(flow_table, &tuple);
> }
>
> +unsigned int
> +nf_flow_offload_ip_hook(void *priv, struct sk_buff *skb,
> + const struct nf_hook_state *state)
> +{
> + struct flow_offload_tuple_rhash *tuplehash;
> + struct nf_flowtable *flow_table = priv;
> + struct flow_offload_tuple *other_tuple;
> + enum flow_offload_tuple_dir dir;
> + struct nf_flowtable_ctx ctx = {
> + .in = state->in,
> + };
> + struct nf_flow_xmit xmit = {};
> + struct in6_addr *ip6_daddr;
> + struct flow_offload *flow;
> + struct neighbour *neigh;
> + struct rtable *rt;
> + __be32 ip_daddr;
> + int ret;
> +
> + tuplehash = nf_flow_offload_lookup(&ctx, flow_table, skb);
> + if (!tuplehash)
> + return NF_ACCEPT;
> +
> + if (ctx.tun.proto == IPPROTO_IPV6)
> + ret = nf_flow_offload_ipv6_forward(&ctx, flow_table, tuplehash,
> + skb);
> + else
> + ret = nf_flow_offload_forward(&ctx, flow_table, tuplehash, skb);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return NF_DROP;
> + else if (ret == 0)
> + return NF_ACCEPT;
> +
> + if (unlikely(tuplehash->tuple.xmit_type == FLOW_OFFLOAD_XMIT_XFRM)) {
> + rt = dst_rtable(tuplehash->tuple.dst_cache);
> + memset(skb->cb, 0, sizeof(struct inet_skb_parm));
> + IPCB(skb)->iif = skb->dev->ifindex;
> + IPCB(skb)->flags = IPSKB_FORWARDED;
> + return nf_flow_xmit_xfrm(skb, state, &rt->dst);
> + }
> +
> + dir = tuplehash->tuple.dir;
> + flow = container_of(tuplehash, struct flow_offload, tuplehash[dir]);
> + other_tuple = &flow->tuplehash[!dir].tuple;
> + ip_daddr = other_tuple->src_v4.s_addr;
> + ip6_daddr = &other_tuple->src_v6;
> +
> + if (nf_flow_tunnel_push(state->net, skb, other_tuple, &ip_daddr,
> + &ip6_daddr) < 0)
> + return NF_DROP;
> +
> + switch (tuplehash->tuple.xmit_type) {
> + case FLOW_OFFLOAD_XMIT_NEIGH: {
> + struct dst_entry *dst;
> +
> + xmit.outdev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(state->net, tuplehash->tuple.ifidx);
> + if (!xmit.outdev) {
> + flow_offload_teardown(flow);
> + return NF_DROP;
> + }
> + if (other_tuple->tun.encap_proto == AF_INET6 ||
> + ctx.tun.proto == IPPROTO_IPV6) {
> + struct rt6_info *rt6;
> +
> + rt6 = dst_rt6_info(tuplehash->tuple.dst_cache);
> + neigh = ip_neigh_gw6(rt6->dst.dev,
> + rt6_nexthop(rt6, ip6_daddr));
> + dst = &rt6->dst;
> + } else {
> + rt = dst_rtable(tuplehash->tuple.dst_cache);
> + neigh = ip_neigh_gw4(rt->dst.dev,
> + rt_nexthop(rt, ip_daddr));
> + dst = &rt->dst;
> + }
> + if (IS_ERR(neigh)) {
> + flow_offload_teardown(flow);
> + return NF_DROP;
> + }
> + xmit.dest = neigh->ha;
> + skb_dst_set_noref(skb, dst);
> + break;
> + }
> + case FLOW_OFFLOAD_XMIT_DIRECT:
> + xmit.outdev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(state->net, tuplehash->tuple.out.ifidx);
> + if (!xmit.outdev) {
> + flow_offload_teardown(flow);
> + return NF_DROP;
> + }
> + xmit.dest = tuplehash->tuple.out.h_dest;
> + xmit.source = tuplehash->tuple.out.h_source;
> + break;
> + default:
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
> + return NF_DROP;
> + }
> + xmit.tuple = other_tuple;
> + xmit.needs_gso_segment = tuplehash->tuple.needs_gso_segment;
> +
> + return nf_flow_queue_xmit(state->net, skb, &xmit);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_flow_offload_ip_hook);
> +
> unsigned int
> nf_flow_offload_ipv6_hook(void *priv, struct sk_buff *skb,
> const struct nf_hook_state *state)
> @@ -1182,6 +1204,7 @@ nf_flow_offload_ipv6_hook(void *priv, struct sk_buff *skb,
> struct flow_offload *flow;
> struct neighbour *neigh;
> struct rt6_info *rt;
> + __be32 ip_daddr;
> int ret;
>
> tuplehash = nf_flow_offload_ipv6_lookup(&ctx, flow_table, skb);
> @@ -1209,10 +1232,11 @@ nf_flow_offload_ipv6_hook(void *priv, struct sk_buff *skb,
> dir = tuplehash->tuple.dir;
> flow = container_of(tuplehash, struct flow_offload, tuplehash[dir]);
> other_tuple = &flow->tuplehash[!dir].tuple;
> + ip_daddr = other_tuple->src_v4.s_addr;
> ip6_daddr = &other_tuple->src_v6;
>
> - if (nf_flow_tunnel_v6_push(state->net, skb, other_tuple,
> - &ip6_daddr) < 0)
> + if (nf_flow_tunnel_push(state->net, skb, other_tuple, &ip_daddr,
> + &ip6_daddr) < 0)
> return NF_DROP;
>
> switch (tuplehash->tuple.xmit_type) {
> @@ -1226,10 +1250,8 @@ nf_flow_offload_ipv6_hook(void *priv, struct sk_buff *skb,
> }
> if (other_tuple->tun.encap_proto == AF_INET ||
> ctx.tun.proto == IPPROTO_IPIP) {
> - __be32 ip_daddr = other_tuple->src_v4.s_addr;
> struct rtable *rt4;
>
> - skb->protocol = htons(ETH_P_IP);
> rt4 = dst_rtable(tuplehash->tuple.dst_cache);
> neigh = ip_neigh_gw4(rt4->dst.dev,
> rt_nexthop(rt4, ip_daddr));
>
> --
> 2.55.0
>
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-03 14:10 [PATCH nf-next v4 0/6] Add IPv4 over IPv6 and SIT flowtable SW acceleration Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-07-03 14:10 ` [PATCH nf-next v4 1/6] net: netfilter: Add ether_type to net_device_path_ctx Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-07-03 14:10 ` [PATCH nf-next v4 2/6] net: netfilter: Add encap_proto to flow_offload_tunnel Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-07-03 14:10 ` [PATCH nf-next v4 3/6] net: netfilter: Add IPv4 over IPv6 tunnel flowtable acceleration Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-07-07 16:25 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-07-08 10:11 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-07-03 14:10 ` [PATCH nf-next v4 4/6] selftests: netfilter: nft_flowtable.sh: Add IPv4 over IPv6 flowtable selftest Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-07-03 14:10 ` [PATCH nf-next v4 5/6] net: netfilter: Add SIT tunnel flowtable acceleration Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-07-08 8:17 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-07-08 10:33 ` Lorenzo Bianconi [this message]
2026-07-03 14:10 ` [PATCH nf-next v4 6/6] selftests: netfilter: nft_flowtable.sh: Add SIT flowtable selftest Lorenzo Bianconi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ak4nltE006uDesMl@lore-desk \
--to=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
--cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=phil@nwl.cc \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox