Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
To: Cen Zhang <zzzccc427@gmail.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfrm: cache the offload ifindex for netlink dumps
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 08:18:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aktIrbQDaG5M-3MJ@secunet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260627035058.2745055-1-zzzccc427@gmail.com>

On Sat, Jun 27, 2026 at 11:50:58AM +0800, Cen Zhang wrote:
> copy_to_user_state_extra() only holds a reference to the outer xfrm_state.
> That does not pin x->xso.dev. NETDEV_DOWN and NETDEV_UNREGISTER can race
> through xfrm_dev_state_flush(), xfrm_state_delete(), and
> xfrm_dev_state_free(), which clears xso->dev and drops the netdev
> reference before the GETSA dump reaches xso_to_xuo() and reads
> xso->dev->ifindex.
> 
> The buggy scenario involves two paths, with each column showing the order
> within that path:
> 
> XFRM_MSG_GETSA dump path:           NETDEV teardown path:
> 1. xfrm_get_sa() gets xfrm_state    1. xfrm_dev_state_flush() finds x
> 2. copy_to_user_state_extra() sees  2. xfrm_state_delete() removes x
>    x->xso.dev                          from the SAD
> 3. copy_user_offload() calls        3. xfrm_dev_state_free() clears
>    xso_to_xuo()                        xso->dev
> 4. xso->dev->ifindex dereferences   4. netdev_put() drops the device
>    a detached net_device               reference
> 
> Avoid following the live net_device from the dump paths. Cache the
> attached ifindex in xfrm_dev_offload when state or policy offload is bound
> to a device, and serialize that snapshot instead. This preserves the
> user-visible XFRMA_OFFLOAD_DEV value without depending on the embedded
> net_device lifetime.
> 
> Validation reproduced this kernel report:
> Oops: general protection fault
> 
> Call Trace:
>  <TASK>
>  copy_to_user_state_extra+0xb8d/0x1370 [xfrm_user]
>  ? __pfx_copy_to_user_state_extra+0x10/0x10 [xfrm_user]
>  ? __asan_memset+0x23/0x50
>  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
>  ? __alloc_skb+0x342/0x960
>  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
>  ? __asan_memset+0x23/0x50
>  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
>  ? __nlmsg_put+0x147/0x1b0
>  dump_one_state+0x1c7/0x3e0 [xfrm_user]
>  xfrm_state_netlink+0xcb/0x130 [xfrm_user]
>  ? __pfx_xfrm_state_netlink+0x10/0x10 [xfrm_user]
>  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
>  ? xfrm_user_state_lookup.constprop.0+0x230/0x310 [xfrm_user]
>  xfrm_get_sa+0x102/0x250 [xfrm_user]
>  ? __pfx_xfrm_get_sa+0x10/0x10 [xfrm_user]
>  xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x504/0xaa0 [xfrm_user]
>  ? __pfx_xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x10/0x10 [xfrm_user]
>  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
>  ? stack_trace_save+0x8e/0xc0
>  ? __pfx_stack_trace_save+0x10/0x10
>  netlink_rcv_skb+0x11f/0x350
>  ? __pfx_xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x10/0x10 [xfrm_user]
>  ? __pfx_netlink_rcv_skb+0x10/0x10
>  ? __pfx_mutex_lock+0x10/0x10
>  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
>  xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x65/0x80 [xfrm_user]
>  netlink_unicast+0x600/0x870
>  ? __pfx_netlink_unicast+0x10/0x10
>  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
>  ? __pfx_stack_trace_save+0x10/0x10
>  netlink_sendmsg+0x75d/0xc10
>  ? __pfx_netlink_sendmsg+0x10/0x10
>  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
>  ____sys_sendmsg+0x77a/0x900
>  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
>  ? __pfx_____sys_sendmsg+0x10/0x10
>  ? __pfx_copy_msghdr_from_user+0x10/0x10
>  ? release_sock+0x1a/0x1d0
>  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
>  ? netlink_insert+0x143/0xec0
>  ___sys_sendmsg+0xff/0x180
>  ? __pfx____sys_sendmsg+0x10/0x10
>  ? _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x85/0xe0
>  ? do_getsockname+0xf9/0x170
>  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
>  ? fdget+0x53/0x3b0
>  __sys_sendmsg+0x111/0x1a0
>  ? __pfx___sys_sendmsg+0x10/0x10
>  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
>  ? __sys_getsockname+0x8c/0x100
>  do_syscall_64+0x102/0x5a0
>  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
> 
> Fixes: 07b87f9eea0c ("xfrm: Fix unregister netdevice hang on hardware offload.")
> Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5.5
> Signed-off-by: Cen Zhang <zzzccc427@gmail.com>

Patch applied, thanks a lot!

      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-06  6:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-27  3:50 [PATCH v2] xfrm: cache the offload ifindex for netlink dumps Cen Zhang
2026-07-06  6:18 ` Steffen Klassert [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aktIrbQDaG5M-3MJ@secunet.com \
    --to=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
    --cc=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=zzzccc427@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox