From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Mahe Tardy <mahe.tardy@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, andrii@kernel.org,
ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, davem@davemloft.net,
eddyz87@gmail.com, edumazet@google.com,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org, liamwisehart@meta.com,
martin.lau@linux.dev, pabeni@redhat.com, song@kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/6] bpf: Add ksock kfuncs
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 09:58:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <akvdsqFhq0x19cu2@devvm7509.cco0.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706093525.13030-3-mahe.tardy@gmail.com>
On 07/06, Mahe Tardy wrote:
> Add BPF kfuncs that allow BPF LSM programs to create and use sockets for
> sending data. This provides a mechanism for BPF programs to emit
> telemetry. For this first patch set, it's restricted to SOCK_DGRAM
> socket types with IPPROTO_UDP protocol but could be easily extended to
> SOCK_STREAM and IPPROTO_TCP in the future.
>
> The API consists of six kfuncs:
>
> bpf_ksock_create() - Create a socket (sleepable)
[..]
> bpf_ksock_bind() - Bind socket to local address (sleepable)
> bpf_ksock_connect() - Connect socket to remote address (sleepable)
Since you're doing only UDP for now, maybe you don't need bind/connect? The
kernel should autobind (by default) when you sendmsg over UDP socket (IIRC).
> bpf_ksock_send() - Send data through the socket (sleepable)
> bpf_ksock_acquire() - Acquire a reference to a socket context
> bpf_ksock_release() - Release a reference (cleanup via
> queue_rcu_work since sock_release sleeps)
>
> The setup kfuncs bpf_ksock_create, bpf_ksock_bind, bpf_ksock_connect,
> can be called from SYSCALL programs only. While bpf_ksock_acquire,
> bpf_ksock_release and bpf_ksock_send can be called from SYSCALL and LSM
> programs.
>
> The implementation follows the established kfunc lifecycle pattern
> (create/acquire/release with refcounting, kptr map storage, dtor
> registration). The kernel socket is wrapped in a refcounted bpf_ksock
> struct. Cleanup is deferred via queue_rcu_work() because sock_release()
> may sleep.
>
> The kfuncs are only compiled when CONFIG_INET is enabled, as they
> specifically support AF_INET and AF_INET6 sockets.
>
> The socket operations go through the expected LSM hooks instead of
> by-passing them like many kernel sockets since those are created by BPF
> programs and thus system users. Thus bpf_ksock_send() kfunc, which is
> exposed to LSM progs, has a re-entering protection to avoid recursion.
> Also, because of the LSM checks, we prevent the use of the kfuncs from
> asynchronous workqueue as the current value would then be invalid.
[..]
> A bpf_ksock_max sysctl is added to limit the maximum number of BPF
> kernel sockets that may exist in each network namespace. Out of
> simplicity for now, the settings is host wide but the counters are per
> network namespace.
What is this guarding against? Rogue bpf programs creating too many sockets?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-06 16:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-06 9:35 [PATCH bpf-next 0/6] Introduce bpf_ksock Mahe Tardy
2026-07-06 9:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/6] net: Add __sys_connect_socket() helper Mahe Tardy
2026-07-06 9:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/6] bpf: Add ksock kfuncs Mahe Tardy
2026-07-06 10:30 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-06 15:28 ` Mahe Tardy
2026-07-06 16:58 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2026-07-06 17:26 ` Mahe Tardy
2026-07-06 20:21 ` Amery Hung
2026-07-06 21:02 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-07-06 22:50 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-07-06 21:33 ` Amery Hung
2026-07-06 23:01 ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-07-06 9:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/6] selftests/bpf: Add ksock kfunc test Mahe Tardy
2026-07-06 10:16 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-06 15:27 ` Mahe Tardy
2026-07-06 9:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/6] selftests/bpf: Add ksock LSM recursion test Mahe Tardy
2026-07-06 9:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/6] selftests/bpf: Add ksock net ns quota tests Mahe Tardy
2026-07-06 9:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add ksock test for async callback guard Mahe Tardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=akvdsqFhq0x19cu2@devvm7509.cco0.facebook.com \
--to=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=liamwisehart@meta.com \
--cc=mahe.tardy@gmail.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox