Netdev List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf.kernel@gmail.com>
To: Mahe Tardy <mahe.tardy@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, andrii@kernel.org,
	 ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, davem@davemloft.net,
	eddyz87@gmail.com,  edumazet@google.com,
	john.fastabend@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org, liamwisehart@meta.com,
	 martin.lau@linux.dev, pabeni@redhat.com, song@kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/6] bpf: Add ksock kfuncs
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2026 09:58:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <akvdsqFhq0x19cu2@devvm7509.cco0.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706093525.13030-3-mahe.tardy@gmail.com>

On 07/06, Mahe Tardy wrote:
> Add BPF kfuncs that allow BPF LSM programs to create and use sockets for
> sending data. This provides a mechanism for BPF programs to emit
> telemetry. For this first patch set, it's restricted to SOCK_DGRAM
> socket types with IPPROTO_UDP protocol but could be easily extended to
> SOCK_STREAM and IPPROTO_TCP in the future.
> 
> The API consists of six kfuncs:
> 
>   bpf_ksock_create()   - Create a socket (sleepable)

[..]

>   bpf_ksock_bind()     - Bind socket to local address (sleepable)
>   bpf_ksock_connect()  - Connect socket to remote address (sleepable)

Since you're doing only UDP for now, maybe you don't need bind/connect? The
kernel should autobind (by default) when you sendmsg over UDP socket (IIRC).

>   bpf_ksock_send()     - Send data through the socket (sleepable)
>   bpf_ksock_acquire()  - Acquire a reference to a socket context
>   bpf_ksock_release()  - Release a reference (cleanup via
>                          queue_rcu_work since sock_release sleeps)
> 
> The setup kfuncs bpf_ksock_create, bpf_ksock_bind, bpf_ksock_connect,
> can be called from SYSCALL programs only. While bpf_ksock_acquire,
> bpf_ksock_release and bpf_ksock_send can be called from SYSCALL and LSM
> programs.
> 
> The implementation follows the established kfunc lifecycle pattern
> (create/acquire/release with refcounting, kptr map storage, dtor
> registration). The kernel socket is wrapped in a refcounted bpf_ksock
> struct. Cleanup is deferred via queue_rcu_work() because sock_release()
> may sleep.
> 
> The kfuncs are only compiled when CONFIG_INET is enabled, as they
> specifically support AF_INET and AF_INET6 sockets.
> 
> The socket operations go through the expected LSM hooks instead of
> by-passing them like many kernel sockets since those are created by BPF
> programs and thus system users. Thus bpf_ksock_send() kfunc, which is
> exposed to LSM progs, has a re-entering protection to avoid recursion.
> Also, because of the LSM checks, we prevent the use of the kfuncs from
> asynchronous workqueue as the current value would then be invalid.

[..]

> A bpf_ksock_max sysctl is added to limit the maximum number of BPF
> kernel sockets that may exist in each network namespace. Out of
> simplicity for now, the settings is host wide but the counters are per
> network namespace.

What is this guarding against? Rogue bpf programs creating too many sockets?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-06 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-06  9:35 [PATCH bpf-next 0/6] Introduce bpf_ksock Mahe Tardy
2026-07-06  9:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/6] net: Add __sys_connect_socket() helper Mahe Tardy
2026-07-06  9:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/6] bpf: Add ksock kfuncs Mahe Tardy
2026-07-06 10:30   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-06 15:28     ` Mahe Tardy
2026-07-06 16:58   ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2026-07-06 17:26     ` Mahe Tardy
2026-07-06 20:21       ` Amery Hung
2026-07-06 21:02       ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-07-06 22:50         ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-07-06 21:33   ` Amery Hung
2026-07-06 23:01   ` Kuniyuki Iwashima
2026-07-06  9:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/6] selftests/bpf: Add ksock kfunc test Mahe Tardy
2026-07-06 10:16   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-07-06 15:27     ` Mahe Tardy
2026-07-06  9:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/6] selftests/bpf: Add ksock LSM recursion test Mahe Tardy
2026-07-06  9:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/6] selftests/bpf: Add ksock net ns quota tests Mahe Tardy
2026-07-06  9:35 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add ksock test for async callback guard Mahe Tardy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=akvdsqFhq0x19cu2@devvm7509.cco0.facebook.com \
    --to=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=liamwisehart@meta.com \
    --cc=mahe.tardy@gmail.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox