From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Vladimir Vdovin <deliran@verdict.gg>,
Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>,
Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/6] netlink: specs: Add XDP RX checksum capability to XDP metadata specs
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2026 19:08:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alZtI782RGKb8y4Y@lore-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alE8oBxkrak8n602@devvm7509.cco0.facebook.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3985 bytes --]
> On 07/08, Vladimir Vdovin wrote:
> > From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
> >
> > Introduce XDP RX checksum capability to XDP metadata specs. XDP RX
> > checksum will be use by devices capable of exposing receive checksum
> > result via bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_checksum().
> > Moreover, introduce xmo_rx_checksum netdev callback in order to allow
> > the eBPF program bound to the device to retrieve the RX checksum result
> > computed by the hw NIC and reported via DMA descriptors.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Vdovin <deliran@verdict.gg>
> > ---
> > Documentation/netlink/specs/netdev.yaml | 5 ++++
> > include/net/xdp.h | 18 ++++++++++++++
> > include/uapi/linux/netdev.h | 3 +++
> > net/core/xdp.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > tools/include/uapi/linux/netdev.h | 3 +++
> > 5 files changed, 61 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/netlink/specs/netdev.yaml b/Documentation/netlink/specs/netdev.yaml
> > index 5f143da7458c..6d0d90d3a614 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/netlink/specs/netdev.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/netlink/specs/netdev.yaml
> > @@ -61,6 +61,11 @@ definitions:
> > doc: |
> > Device is capable of exposing receive packet VLAN tag via
> > bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_vlan_tag().
> > + -
> > + name: checksum
> > + doc: |
> > + Device is capable of exposing receive checksum result via
> > + bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_checksum().
> > -
> > type: flags
> > name: xsk-flags
> > diff --git a/include/net/xdp.h b/include/net/xdp.h
> > index aa742f413c35..e255ff786131 100644
> > --- a/include/net/xdp.h
> > +++ b/include/net/xdp.h
> > @@ -586,6 +586,10 @@ void xdp_attachment_setup(struct xdp_attachment_info *info,
> > NETDEV_XDP_RX_METADATA_VLAN_TAG, \
> > bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_vlan_tag, \
> > xmo_rx_vlan_tag) \
> > + XDP_METADATA_KFUNC(XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_RX_CHECKSUM, \
> > + NETDEV_XDP_RX_METADATA_CHECKSUM, \
> > + bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_checksum, \
> > + xmo_rx_checksum)
> >
> > enum xdp_rx_metadata {
> > #define XDP_METADATA_KFUNC(name, _, __, ___) name,
> > @@ -643,12 +647,26 @@ enum xdp_rss_hash_type {
> > XDP_RSS_TYPE_L4_IPV6_SCTP_EX = XDP_RSS_TYPE_L4_IPV6_SCTP | XDP_RSS_L3_DYNHDR,
> > };
>
> [..]
>
> > +/* Please note the driver is required to invalidate the checksum if the NIC
> > + * reports CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY or CHECKSUM_COMPLETE and the eBPF program
> > + * modifies the packet since it can change some fields validated by the
> > + * checksum.
> > + */
>
> Sorry, a bit confused about this part. IIUC this is in response to this
> discussion https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/aaLYfWnuuf_ne72u@lore-desk/ ?
>
> Looking at a few drivers:
> - bnxt (bnxt_rx_pkt) does UNNECESSARY - ok
> - mlx5 (mlx5e_handle_csum) does UNNECESSARY and skips COMPLETE if there is
> bpf prog attached
> - fbnic (fbnic_rx_csum) - can do COMPLETE even with xdp attached?
> - gve (gve_rx) - can do COMPLETE even with xdp attached?
>
> So none of the drivers invalidate anything (and nether the bpf machinery), some
> choose to (correctly?) not report COMPLETE when there is XDP. So was the
> discussion about documenting this and giving some guidance? This probably
> belongs to that `DOC: skb checksums` section of include/linux/skbuff.h?
Hi Stanislav,
re-reading the previous upstream discussion, I guess we should just document the
expected driver behaviour (invalidate the cksum for both COMPLETE and
UNNECESSARY cases when the XDP program running on the NIC returns XDP_PASS) and
add a given kselftest for it. Agree?
>
> Also, can you add your new rx_checksum to
> Documentation/networking/xdp-rx-metadata.rst's list of supported kfuncs?
ack, I will do it in the next iteration.
Regards,
Lorenzo
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-14 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 20:34 [PATCH bpf-next v4 0/6] Add the capability to load HW RX checksum in eBPF programs Vladimir Vdovin
2026-07-08 20:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 1/6] netlink: specs: Add XDP RX checksum capability to XDP metadata specs Vladimir Vdovin
2026-07-10 10:09 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-07-10 19:05 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2026-07-14 17:08 ` Lorenzo Bianconi [this message]
2026-07-08 20:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/6] net: veth: Add xmo_rx_checksum callback to veth driver Vladimir Vdovin
2026-07-10 10:09 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-07-08 20:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 3/6] net: ice: Add xmo_rx_checksum callback Vladimir Vdovin
2026-07-10 10:10 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-07-08 20:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 4/6] selftests/bpf: Add selftest support for bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_checksum Vladimir Vdovin
2026-07-08 20:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 5/6] selftests/bpf: Add bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_checksum support to xdp_hw_metadat prog Vladimir Vdovin
2026-07-10 10:11 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
2026-07-08 20:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next v4 6/6] selftests: drv-net: add XDP RX checksum metadata tests Vladimir Vdovin
2026-07-10 10:12 ` Loktionov, Aleksandr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alZtI782RGKb8y4Y@lore-desk \
--to=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=deliran@verdict.gg \
--cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
--cc=sdf.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox